Literature DB >> 24694342

Prior high-risk human papillomavirus testing and Papanicolaou test results of 70 invasive cervical carcinomas diagnosed in 2012: results of a retrospective multicenter study.

Chengquan Zhao1, Zaibo Li, Ritu Nayar, Angelique W Levi, Barbara A Winkler, Ann T Moriarty, Güliz A Barkan, Jianyu Rao, Fern Miller, Fang Fan, Zhongren Zhou, Qiusheng Si, Andrew H Fischer, Charles D Sturgis, Xin Jing, Carrie B Marshall, Benjamin L Witt, George G Birdsong, Barbara A Crothers.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection is essential for the development of cervical cancer and its precursor lesions. High-risk HPV testing has a higher sensitivity than cytology does for detecting cervical epithelial lesions. However, a large study from a single institution showed 31% of patients with invasive cervical cancer had negative baseline hrHPV testing within 5 years preceding the diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the limitation of hrHPV testing in detecting invasive cervical cancer.
DESIGN: Cases from 2012 with a histologic diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma were retrieved from multiple institutions. From those records, prior hrHPV testing and Papanicolaou test results in the 5 years before the cancer diagnosis were recorded.
RESULTS: Seventy patients with cervical carcinoma were included in the study. Negative HPV test result rates were 9% (5 of 53), 23% (6 of 26), and 25% (2 of 8) during the periods of less than 1 year, 1 to 3 years, and 3 to 5 years before the histologic diagnoses, respectively. Negative Papanicolaou testing results in the same time intervals were 3.4% (2 of 59), 33% (10 of 30), and 40% (6 of 15). Although the HPV(-) rate seemed to be different among different HPV test methods, no statistical significance was detected because of small sample size. Negative hrHPV rates in patients with adenocarcinoma were similar to those in patients with squamous cell carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: These data expose limitations for the potential use of primary HPV testing. In addition, current screening guidelines recommending cotesting at 5-year intervals should be evaluated further with additional historic data collection because there are women with negative results for both Papanicolaou tests and hrHPV testing within the period of 3 to 5 years before an invasive carcinoma diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24694342     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0028-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  9 in total

1.  Uptake of HPV testing and extended cervical cancer screening intervals following cytology alone and Pap/HPV cotesting in women aged 30-65 years.

Authors:  Michelle I Silver; Anne F Rositch; Darcy F Phelan-Emrick; Patti E Gravitt
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Point-Counterpoint: Cervical Cancer Screening Should Be Done by Primary Human Papillomavirus Testing with Genotyping and Reflex Cytology for Women over the Age of 25 Years.

Authors:  Mark H Stoler; R Marshall Austin; Chengquan Zhao
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Cervical Cancer Screening for Patients on the Female-to-Male Spectrum: a Narrative Review and Guide for Clinicians.

Authors:  Jennifer Potter; Sarah M Peitzmeier; Ida Bernstein; Sari L Reisner; Natalie M Alizaga; Madina Agénor; Dana J Pardee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Epidemiological study of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in subjects with abnormal cytological findings in cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Weizhi You; Shaocong Li; Ran Du; Jizeng Zheng; Aifang Shen
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Comparison of cervical cancer screening results among 256,648 women in multiple clinical practices.

Authors:  Amy J Blatt; Ronald Kennedy; Ronald D Luff; R Marshall Austin; Douglas S Rabin
Journal:  Cancer Cytopathol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Prevalence characteristics of high-risk human papillomaviruses in women living in Shanghai with cervical precancerous lesions and cancer.

Authors:  Ying Gu; Chenyun Ma; Jue Zou; Yi Zhu; Rong Yang; Yan Xu; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-04-26

7.  Previous cervical cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus testing in a cohort of patients with invasive cervical carcinoma in Shandong Province, China.

Authors:  Liran Zhang; Fengxiang Xie; Xinguo Wang; Dezhi Peng; Chunrui Bi; Lingbo Jiang; Dongman Zhao; Xinxin Tian; Debo Qi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Diagnostic Utility of p16 Immunostaining in Differentiating Cancer and HSIL from LSIL and Benign in Cervical Cells.

Authors:  Ming-Zhe Wu; Shiyu Wang; Min Zheng; Li-Xiang Tian; Xin Wu; Ke-Jun Guo; Y I Zhang; Guang-Ping Wu
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  High Expression of Circular RNA-Mitochondrial tRNA Translation Optimization 1 Assists the Diagnosis of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Xiyun Cheng; Changmei Shen; Zhenrong Liao
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 3.842

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.