Literature DB >> 24693543

Reply to Nuijten et al.: Reanalyses actually confirm that US studies overestimate effects in softer research.

Daniele Fanelli, John P A Ioannidis.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24693543      PMCID： PMC3932901          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.1322565111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research.

Authors:  Michèle B Nuijten; Marcel A L M van Assen; Robbie C M van Aert; Jelte M Wicherts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Meta-assessment of bias in science.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli; Rodrigo Costas; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 11.205
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.