Literature DB >> 24692621

Outcome, revision rate and indication for revision following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the shoulder: 837 operations reported to the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry.

J V Rasmussen1, A Polk, A K Sorensen, B S Olsen, S Brorson.   

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated patient-reported outcomes, the rate of revision and the indications for revision following resurfacing hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in patients with osteoarthritis. All patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary resurfacing hemiarthroplasty and reported to the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry (DSR), between January 2006 and December 2010 were included. There were 772 patients (837 arthroplasties) in the study. The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index was used to evaluate patient-reported outcome 12 months (10 to 14) post-operatively. The rates of revision were calculated from the revisions reported to the DSR up to December 2011 and by checking deaths with the Danish National Register of Persons. A complete questionnaire was returned by 688 patients (82.2%). The mean WOOS was 67 (0 to 100). A total of 63 hemiarthroplasties (7.5%) required revision; the cumulative five-year rate of revision was 9.9%. Patients aged < 55 years had a statistically significant inferior WOOS score, which exceeded the minimal clinically important difference, compared with older patients (mean difference 14.2 (8.8; 95% CI 19.6; p < 0.001), but with no increased risk of revision. There was no significant difference in the mean WOOS or the risk of revision between designs of resurfacing hemiarthroplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Osteoarthritis; Shoulder; outcome; resurfacing; revision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24692621     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.31850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  12 in total

1.  Resurfacing hemiarthroplasty compared to stemmed hemiarthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Jeppe V Rasmussen; Bo S Olsen; Anne Kathrine Sorensen; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Stig Brorson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Michael Thomas; Amit Bidwai; Amar Rangan; Jonathan L Rees; Peter Brownson; Duncan Tennent; Clare Connor; Rohit Kulkarni
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-04-25

3.  Previous surgery for instability is a risk factor for a worse patient-reported outcome after anatomical shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a Danish nationwide cohort study of 3,743 arthroplasties.

Authors:  Jeppe V Rasmussen; Bo S Olsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.925

4.  Revision shoulder arthroplasty for failed humeral head resurfacing hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Tanujan Thangarajah; Sara Ajami; Melanie Coathup; Gordon W Blunn; Deborah Higgs; Mark Falworth; Simon Lambert
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-06-13

5.  Cementless humeral head resurfacing for degenerative glenohumeral osteoarthritis fails at a high rate.

Authors:  Michael W Maier; Pit Hetto; Patric Raiss; Matthias Klotz; Matthias Bülhoff; David Spranz; Felix Zeifang
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-21

6.  High Completeness and Accurate Reporting of Key Variables Make Data from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry a Valuable Source of Information.

Authors:  Jeppe Vejlgaard Rasmussen; Anders El-Galaly; Theis Muncholm Thillemann; Steen Lund Jensen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  The Kaiser Permanente shoulder arthroplasty registry: results from 6,336 primary shoulder arthroplasties.

Authors:  Mark T Dillon; Christopher F Ake; Mary F Burke; Anshuman Singh; Edward H Yian; Elizabeth W Paxton; Ronald A Navarro
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  High risk for revision after shoulder arthroplasty for failed osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Marc Randall Kristensen; Jeppe Vejlgaard Rasmussen; Brian Elmengaard; Steen Lund Jensen; Bo Sanderhoff Olsen; Stig Brorson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Analysis of revision shoulder arthroplasty in the German nationwide registry from 2014 to 2018.

Authors:  Jörn Kircher; Birgit Ohly; Milad Farkhondeh Fal; Petra Magosch; Frieder Mauch
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-02-09

10.  Low inter-observer agreement among experienced shoulder surgeons assessing overstuffing of glenohumeral resurfacing hemiarthroplasty based on plain radiographs.

Authors:  Nicolai Sandau; Stig Brorson; Bo S Olsen; Anne Kathrine Sørensen; Steen L Jensen; Kim Schantz; Janne Ovesen; Jeppe V Rasmussen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.