OBJECTIVES: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent extra-articular manifestation of RA associated with increased mortality. High-resolution CT (HRCT) is used for diagnosis and follow-up, but its accuracy is counterbalanced by high costs and radiological risk. In the presence of ILD, lung US (LUS) detects vertical artefacts called B-lines. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the accuracy of LUS in the diagnosis of ILD in RA and to validate the use of a pocket-size US device (PS-USD) as a screening tool. METHODS: LUS was performed with standard equipment by a trained physician through longitudinal scans following anatomical lines: 72 segments were considered (28 anteriorly and 44 posteriorly) and B-lines were counted in each segment. A B-lines score >10 identified a positive examination (presence of ILD). A second LUS session for positive/negative judgment was performed by a short-trained physician using a PS-USD. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were studied. The sensitivity and specificity of standard LUS vs HRCT were 92% and 56%, respectively. The B-line score was significantly correlated with HRCT score (r = 0.806). A total of 29 patients were studied with a PS-USD. Sensitivity and specificity for PS-USD vs HRCT were 89% and 50%. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of LUS in the detection of ILD supports its use as a screening test for ILD in RA patients, even in the ambulatory setting with a PS-USD. The strong correlation between echographic and HRCT scores indicates LUS is a valid tool for grading and follow-up of ILD.
OBJECTIVES:Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a frequent extra-articular manifestation of RA associated with increased mortality. High-resolution CT (HRCT) is used for diagnosis and follow-up, but its accuracy is counterbalanced by high costs and radiological risk. In the presence of ILD, lung US (LUS) detects vertical artefacts called B-lines. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the accuracy of LUS in the diagnosis of ILD in RA and to validate the use of a pocket-size US device (PS-USD) as a screening tool. METHODS: LUS was performed with standard equipment by a trained physician through longitudinal scans following anatomical lines: 72 segments were considered (28 anteriorly and 44 posteriorly) and B-lines were counted in each segment. A B-lines score >10 identified a positive examination (presence of ILD). A second LUS session for positive/negative judgment was performed by a short-trained physician using a PS-USD. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were studied. The sensitivity and specificity of standard LUS vs HRCT were 92% and 56%, respectively. The B-line score was significantly correlated with HRCT score (r = 0.806). A total of 29 patients were studied with a PS-USD. Sensitivity and specificity for PS-USD vs HRCT were 89% and 50%. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of LUS in the detection of ILD supports its use as a screening test for ILD in RApatients, even in the ambulatory setting with a PS-USD. The strong correlation between echographic and HRCT scores indicates LUS is a valid tool for grading and follow-up of ILD.
Authors: Marwin Gutierrez; Luis Enrique Gomez-Quiroz; Denise Clavijo-Cornejo; Carlos A Lozada; Ana C Lozada-Navarro; Roxana U Miranda Labra; Javier Fernandez-Torres; Guadalupe Sanchez-Bringas; Fausto Salaffi; Chiara Bertolazzi; Carlos Pineda Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2016-06-21 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Elke Platz; Emanuele Pivetta; Allison A Merz; Julie Peck; Jose Rivero; Susan Cheng Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2015-06-06 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Elke Platz; Pardeep S Jhund; Nicolas Girerd; Emanuele Pivetta; John J V McMurray; W Frank Peacock; Josep Masip; Francisco Javier Martin-Sanchez; Òscar Miró; Susanna Price; Louise Cullen; Alan S Maisel; Christiaan Vrints; Martin R Cowie; Salvatore DiSomma; Hector Bueno; Alexandre Mebazaa; Danielle M Gualandro; Mucio Tavares; Marco Metra; Andrew J S Coats; Frank Ruschitzka; Petar M Seferovic; Christian Mueller Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Christoph F Dietrich; Gebhard Mathis; Michael Blaivas; Giovanni Volpicelli; Armin Seibel; Daniel Wastl; Nathan S S Atkinson; Xin-Wu Cui; Mei Fan; Dong Yi Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 2.895