Peter Tugwell1, Maarten Boers, Maria-Antonietta D'Agostino, Dorcas Beaton, Annelies Boonen, Clifton O Bingham, Ernest Choy, Philip G Conaghan, Maxime Dougados, Catia Duarte, Daniel E Furst, Francis Guillemin, Laure Gossec, Turid Heiberg, Désirée M van der Heijde, Sarah Hewlett, John R Kirwan, Tore K Kvien, Robert B Landewé, Philip J Mease, Mikkel Østergaard, Lee Simon, Jasvinder A Singh, Vibeke Strand, George Wells. 1. From the Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Versailles-Saint Quentin En Yvelines University, Department of Rheumatology, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, Boulogne-Billancourt; Paris-Descartes University, Medicine Faculty, APHP, Cochin Hospital, Rheumatology B, Paris, France; Department of Occupational Sciences and Occupational Therapy, Institute for Health Policy Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Caphri Research Institute, Maastricht University, The Netherlands; Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; Section of Rheumatology, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK; Division of Musculoskeletal Disease, University of Leeds, and the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, UK; Rheumatology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; Department of Rheumatology, Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California in Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Université de Lorraine, EA 4360 APEMAC, Nancy; Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) - Paris 6, GRC-UMPC 08 (EEMOIS); AP-HP Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Department of Rheumatology, Paris, France; Oslo University Hospital and Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; University of the West of England, Academic Rheumatology Unit, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK; Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam and Atrium Medical Center Heerlen, Heerlen, The
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter provides guidelines for the development and validation of outcome measures for use in clinical research. The "Truth" section of the OMERACT Filter requires that criteria be met to demonstrate that the outcome instrument meets the criteria for content, face, and construct validity. METHODS: Discussion groups critically reviewed a variety of ways in which case studies of current OMERACT Working Groups complied with the Truth component of the Filter and what issues remained to be resolved. RESULTS: The case studies showed that there is broad agreement on criteria for meeting the Truth criteria through demonstration of content, face, and construct validity; however, several issues were identified that the Filter Working Group will need to address. CONCLUSION: These issues will require resolution to reach consensus on how Truth will be assessed for the proposed Filter 2.0 framework, for instruments to be endorsed by OMERACT.
OBJECTIVE: The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter provides guidelines for the development and validation of outcome measures for use in clinical research. The "Truth" section of the OMERACT Filter requires that criteria be met to demonstrate that the outcome instrument meets the criteria for content, face, and construct validity. METHODS: Discussion groups critically reviewed a variety of ways in which case studies of current OMERACT Working Groups complied with the Truth component of the Filter and what issues remained to be resolved. RESULTS: The case studies showed that there is broad agreement on criteria for meeting the Truth criteria through demonstration of content, face, and construct validity; however, several issues were identified that the Filter Working Group will need to address. CONCLUSION: These issues will require resolution to reach consensus on how Truth will be assessed for the proposed Filter 2.0 framework, for instruments to be endorsed by OMERACT.
Keywords:
CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; FACE VALIDITY; OMERACT; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
Authors: Sandrine Jousse-Joulin; Emmanuel Nowak; Divi Cornec; Jackie Brown; Andrew Carr; Marina Carotti; Benjamin Fisher; Joel Fradin; Alojzija Hocevar; Malin V Jonsson; Nicoletta Luciano; Vera Milic; John Rout; Elke Theander; Aaltje Stel; Hendrika Bootsma; Arjan Vissink; Chiara Baldini; Alan Baer; Wan Fai Ng; Simon Bowman; Zarrin Alavi; Alain Saraux; Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec Journal: RMD Open Date: 2017-06-09
Authors: Matteo Piga; Alberto Floris; Gerard Espinosa; Luísa Serpa Pinto; Nikolaos Kougkas; Andrea Lo Monaco; Giuseppe Lopalco; Ida Orlando; Vittorio Pirani; Ernestina Santos; George Bertsias; Luca Cantarini; Alberto Cauli; Ricard Cervera; João Correia; Marcello Govoni; Florenzo Iannone; Piergiorgio Neri; Ana Martins Silva; Carlos Vasconcelos; Monica Muntoni; Alessandro Mathieu Journal: RMD Open Date: 2020-07
Authors: Susan J Bartlett; Vivian P Bykerk; Roxanne Cooksey; Ernest H Choy; Rieke Alten; Robin Christensen; Daniel E Furst; Francis Guillemin; Serena Halls; Sarah Hewlett; Amye L Leong; Anne Lyddiatt; Lyn March; Pamela Montie; Ana Maria Orbai; Christoph Pohl; Marieke Scholte Voshaar; Thasia G Woodworth; Clifton O Bingham Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2015-02-15 Impact factor: 4.666