PURPOSE: While the burdens and rewards of cancer caregiving are well-documented, few studies describe the activities involved in cancer caregiving. We employed a social-ecological perspective to explore the work of cancer caregiving for long-term colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors with ostomies. We focused on healthcare management, defined here as the ways in which informal caregivers participate in healthcare-related activities such as managing medical appointments and information, obtaining prescriptions and supplies, and providing transportation to obtain healthcare services. METHODS: This ethnographic study included 31 dyads consisting of long-term CRC survivors (>5 years postsurgery) and their primary informal caregivers. Survivors were members of integrated healthcare delivery systems. We interviewed participants using in-depth interviews and followed a subset using ethnographic methods. Medical record data ascertained survivors' cancer and medical history. RESULTS: We classified families into a matrix of healthcare management resources (high vs. low) and survivors' healthcare needs (high vs. low). We found that patients' healthcare needs did not always correspond to their caregivers' management activities. CRC survivors with high needs had more unmet needs when caregivers and survivors differed in the level of caregiver involvement they desired or regarded as optimal. This discrepancy was particularly evident in nonmarital relationships. CONCLUSIONS: As cancer survivors age and grow in number, it becomes increasingly important to understand how informal caregivers support survivors' well-being. Framing healthcare management as a component of caregiving provides a useful perspective that could facilitate future research and interventions to support survivors, particularly those with significant sequelae from their cancer treatment.
PURPOSE: While the burdens and rewards of cancer caregiving are well-documented, few studies describe the activities involved in cancer caregiving. We employed a social-ecological perspective to explore the work of cancer caregiving for long-term colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors with ostomies. We focused on healthcare management, defined here as the ways in which informal caregivers participate in healthcare-related activities such as managing medical appointments and information, obtaining prescriptions and supplies, and providing transportation to obtain healthcare services. METHODS: This ethnographic study included 31 dyads consisting of long-term CRC survivors (>5 years postsurgery) and their primary informal caregivers. Survivors were members of integrated healthcare delivery systems. We interviewed participants using in-depth interviews and followed a subset using ethnographic methods. Medical record data ascertained survivors' cancer and medical history. RESULTS: We classified families into a matrix of healthcare management resources (high vs. low) and survivors' healthcare needs (high vs. low). We found that patients' healthcare needs did not always correspond to their caregivers' management activities. CRC survivors with high needs had more unmet needs when caregivers and survivors differed in the level of caregiver involvement they desired or regarded as optimal. This discrepancy was particularly evident in nonmarital relationships. CONCLUSIONS: As cancer survivors age and grow in number, it becomes increasingly important to understand how informal caregivers support survivors' well-being. Framing healthcare management as a component of caregiving provides a useful perspective that could facilitate future research and interventions to support survivors, particularly those with significant sequelae from their cancer treatment.
Authors: Carla Parry; Erin E Kent; Angela B Mariotto; Catherine M Alfano; Julia H Rowland Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Carmit K McMullen; Joseph Wasserman; Andrea Altschuler; Marcia L Grant; Mark C Hornbrook; Petra Liljestrand; Catherine Briggs; Robert S Krouse Journal: Clin J Oncol Nurs Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 1.027
Authors: Ayal A Aizer; Ming-Hui Chen; Ellen P McCarthy; Mallika L Mendu; Sophia Koo; Tyler J Wilhite; Powell L Graham; Toni K Choueiri; Karen E Hoffman; Neil E Martin; Jim C Hu; Paul L Nguyen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joanna E Bulkley; Carmit K McMullen; Marcia Grant; Christopher Wendel; Mark C Hornbrook; Robert S Krouse Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mark C Hornbrook; Marcia Grant; Christopher Wendel; Joanna E Bulkley; Carmit K Mcmullen; Andrea Altschuler; Larissa Kf Temple; Lisa J Herrinton; Robert S Krouse Journal: Perm J Date: 2018
Authors: Carmit McMullen; Matthew Nielsen; Alison Firemark; Patricia Merino Price; Denise Nakatani; Jean Tuthill; Ruth McMyn; Anobel Odisho; Michael Meyers; David Shibata; Scott Gilbert Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Lisa J Herrinton; Andrea Altschuler; Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Mark C Hornbrook; Virginia Sun; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Carol M Baldwin; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Larissa K F Temple; Robert S Krouse Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Sylvie D Lambert; Lindsay R Duncan; S Nicole Culos-Reed; Laura Hallward; Celestia S Higano; Ekaterina Loban; Anne Katz; Manon De Raad; Janet Ellis; Melissa B Korman; Carly Sears; Cindy Ibberson; Lauren Walker; Eric Belzile; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; Helen McTaggart-Cowan; Stuart Peacock Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Virginia Sun; Elizabeth Ercolano; Ruth McCorkle; Marcia Grant; Christopher S Wendel; Nancy J Tallman; Frank Passero; Sabreen Raza; Zuleyha Cidav; Michael Holcomb; Ronald S Weinstein; Mark C Hornbrook; Robert S Krouse Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Sabrina Gröpper; Elke van der Meer; Tom Landes; Hubert Bucher; Anna Stickel; Ute Goerling Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 3.359