Literature DB >> 24691524

Value and risk of laparoscopic surgery in hemophiliacs-experiences from a tertiary referral center for hemorrhagic diatheses.

Philipp Lingohr1, Safia Bensoukehal, Hanno Matthaei, Jonas Dohmen, Jennifer Nadal, Tim Oliver Vilz, Arne Koscielny, Johannes Oldenburg, Jörg Christoph Kalff, Georg Goldmann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery (LS) is gaining popularity worldwide because of benefits like faster recovery, earlier hospital discharge, and better cosmetic results. In hemophiliacs, surgery in general harbors an increased risk for severe complications. Whether LS or conventional surgery (CS) should be recommended in these patients is controversial and therefore the issue of our present study.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective matched-pair analysis including laparoscopically operated non-hemophiliacs (LONH), laparoscopically operated hemophiliacs (LOH), and conventionally operated hemophiliacs (COH) concerning duration of surgery, drainages, hospital stay, complications, factor use (VIII, IX, and X), and blood values. Mann-Whitney U test was used (significance level P = 0.05).
RESULTS: No significant differences were found in duration of surgery and drains in laparoscopically or conventionally operated hemophiliacs versus matched pairs. Complication rate did not differ among the different groups. Concerning the total duration of hospital stay (t-DHOS) and the postoperative duration of hospital stay (p-DHOS), there was no statistical difference between LOH versus matched LONH. However, in COH versus matched LOH, a longer time was required for preparation and recovery (t-DHOS, P = 0.04; p-DHOS, P < 0.001). Also, the median factor supply perioperatively including the day of surgery did not differ between laparoscopically versus conventionally operated hemophiliacs.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores the safety and benefits of laparoscopic procedures in hemophiliacs by showing a significantly shorter hospital stay for these patients resulting in reduced therapeutic costs and a faster mobilization. Still, the surgical and perioperative management of hemophiliacs continues to be a challenge requiring an experienced interdisciplinary team.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24691524     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-014-1185-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  11 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.

Authors:  A G Pedersen; O B Petersen; P Wara; H Rønning; N Qvist; S Laurberg
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Stefan Sauerland; Thomas Jaschinski; Edmund Am Neugebauer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a patient with hemophilia B.

Authors:  T Mätzsch; P Almqvist; E Berntorp; S Lethagen; A Montgomery
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1992-12

Review 4.  Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

5.  Intestinal surgery with activated recombinant factor VII prophylaxis in patients with haemophilia A and high responding inhibitors: a report of five cases.

Authors:  Mounia Slaoui; Thierry Lambert; Natalie Stieltjes; Ségolène Claeyssens; Annie Borel-Derlon
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.276

6.  Perioperative management and outcome of general and abdominal surgery in hemophiliacs.

Authors:  Georg Goldmann; Yaroslava Holoborodska; Johannes Oldenburg; Nico Schaefer; Tobias Hoeller; Jens Standop; Joerg C Kalff; Andreas Hirner; Marcus Overhaus
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Surgery of hemophiliacs--20 years' experience.

Authors:  I M Nilsson; U Hedner; A Ahlberg; S A Larsson; S E Bergentz
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 8.  Recent advances in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Wei-Jei Lee; Chien-Pin Chan; Bing-Yen Wang
Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg       Date:  2012-11-06

9.  Cholecystectomy and acquired factor VIII inhibitor coagulopathy.

Authors:  Jason D Walsh; Jeffrey Landercasper; Wayne A Bottner; William C Boyd
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 10.  Optimal haemophilia care versus the reality.

Authors:  Paula H B Bolton-Maggs
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.998

View more
  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy in a hemophilia B patient.

Authors:  Slawomir Gajda; Tomasz Szopiński; Andrzej B Szczepanik; Roman Sosnowski; Anna M Szczepanik
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2016-09-16

2.  New Surgical Technologies Could Facilitate Surgical Hemostasis in Hemophilic Patients.

Authors:  Milcho J Panovski; Igor V Fildishevski; Ljubomir Lj Ognjenovic; Violeta I Dejanova-Ilijevska
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-25

3.  Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients with hemophilia and von Willebrand disease. Prospective controlled study.

Authors:  Konrad Pielaciński; Bartosz Puła; Andrzej B Szczepanik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  Successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a severe type A hemophiliac patient: A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Fariba Zabihi; Sasan Rahimi; Khosrow Ravankhah Moghaddam
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2022-09-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.