Ingrid Ganske1, Marguerite Hoyler, Sharon E Fox, Donald J Morris, Samuel J Lin, Sumner A Slavin. 1. From the *Harvard Combined Plastic Surgery Residency, Boston; †Harvard Medical School, Boston; ‡Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Pathology Residency, Boston; and §Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has become a valuable tool in reconstructive breast surgery, in part because it has been considered to be a non-reactive and non-immunogenic entity. However, some patients who undergo breast reconstruction with ADMs develop postoperative erythema overlying their ADM grafts. The etiology of this phenomenon is poorly understood. METHODS: In this article, we summarize clinical cases in which patients developed localized breast erythema following reconstruction with ADMs. We review what is known about postoperative breast erythema after ADM-based breast reconstructions and the possible antigenicity of biologic mesh implants. RESULTS: We report 4 implant-based breast reconstruction patients who developed erythematous reactions overlying the region where ADM was placed: one demonstrated a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction on punch biopsy of the affected skin, leading to removal of the biologic product; 2 others had a similar clinical presentation that responded to corticosteroids without removal of the biologic material, with 1 patient experiencing recrudescence of erythema that responded fully to a second course of corticosteroids; and a fourth showed erythema that was only moderately responsive to antibiotic therapy but which improved consistently after the patient initiated chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: We propose that the etiology of erythema overlying ADM grafts, and the so-called red breast syndrome, may in some patients be a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to the ADM product. Affected patients may benefit from treatment with corticosteroids or similar medications, and that such treatment may, in some cases, enable patients to retain the ADM grafts and enable salvage of the reconstructed breast.
BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has become a valuable tool in reconstructive breast surgery, in part because it has been considered to be a non-reactive and non-immunogenic entity. However, some patients who undergo breast reconstruction with ADMs develop postoperative erythema overlying their ADM grafts. The etiology of this phenomenon is poorly understood. METHODS: In this article, we summarize clinical cases in which patients developed localized breast erythema following reconstruction with ADMs. We review what is known about postoperative breast erythema after ADM-based breast reconstructions and the possible antigenicity of biologic mesh implants. RESULTS: We report 4 implant-based breast reconstruction patients who developed erythematous reactions overlying the region where ADM was placed: one demonstrated a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction on punch biopsy of the affected skin, leading to removal of the biologic product; 2 others had a similar clinical presentation that responded to corticosteroids without removal of the biologic material, with 1 patient experiencing recrudescence of erythema that responded fully to a second course of corticosteroids; and a fourth showed erythema that was only moderately responsive to antibiotic therapy but which improved consistently after the patient initiated chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: We propose that the etiology of erythema overlying ADM grafts, and the so-called red breast syndrome, may in some patients be a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to the ADM product. Affected patients may benefit from treatment with corticosteroids or similar medications, and that such treatment may, in some cases, enable patients to retain the ADM grafts and enable salvage of the reconstructed breast.
Authors: P Vedak; J St John; A Watson; L Garibyan; M C Mihm; R M Nazarian; P C Levins; C L Cetrulo; P Schalock; D Kroshinsky Journal: Hernia Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Christian Eichler; Jeria Efremova; Klaus Brunnert; Christian M Kurbacher; Oleg Gluz; Julian Puppe; Mathias Warm Journal: In Vivo Date: 2017 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Fabian A Romero; Eleanor A Powell; N Esther Babady; Anna Kaltsas; Cesar J Figueroa; Melissa Pulitzer; Babak J Mehrara; Michael S Glickman; Sejal Morjaria Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2017-09-02 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Michael Zenn; Mark Venturi; Troy Pittman; Scott Spear; Geoffrey Gurtner; Geoffrey Robb; Alex Mesbahi; Joseph Dayan Journal: Eplasty Date: 2017-06-12
Authors: Peter J Nicksic; Rebecca L Farmer; Samuel O Poore; Venkat K Rao; Ahmed M Afifi Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 2.326