Literature DB >> 24691140

Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography as a potential biomarker in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: preliminary results from the Danish Renal Cancer Group Study-1.

Jill Rachel Mains1, Frede Donskov, Erik Morre Pedersen, Hans Henrik Torp Madsen, Finn Rasmussen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore the impact of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) computer tomography (CT) as a biomarker in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with favorable or intermediate Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk group and clear cell mRCC participating in an ongoing prospective randomized phase II trial comprising interleukin-2-based immunotherapy and bevacizumab were included in this preliminary analysis. All patients had a follow-up time of at least 2 years. Interpretation of DCE-CT (max slope method) was performed blinded to treatment group. The DCE-CT scans were performed at baseline, at weeks 5 and 10, and thereafter every third month. Blood flow (BF; mL/min/100 mL), peak enhancement (Hounsfield units), time to peak (seconds), and blood volume (BV; mL/100 g) were calculated. Parameters for DCE-CT were correlated with sum of diameters (defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) using Wilcoxon, Man-Whitney, Kaplan-Meier, and log rank statistics, as appropriate.
RESULTS: Blood flow at baseline ranged from 4.9 to 148.1 mL/min/100 mL (median, 62.2; 25th percentile, 25.8; 75th percentile, 110.0). Patients with high baseline BF (using quartiles as cutoffs) had significantly longer OS (not reached vs 5.2 months, P = 0.011) and longer PFS (not reached vs 3.9 months, P = 0.026). Blood volume at baseline ranged from 8.8 to 74.1 mL/100 g tissue (median, 21.5), and at week 5, from 4.9 to 34.7 mL/100 g (median, 17.2). Relative changes in BV between baseline and week 5 ranged from -64% to +68% (median, -16%; 25th percentile, -41%; 75th percentile, +2%) and were significantly associated with OS using quartiles as cutoffs (5.2 months vs not reached, P = 0.038) and PFS using the median as cutoff (5.3 months vs not reached, P = 0.009), with larger reductions associated with longer survival. Using medians as cutoffs, relative changes in both BF and BV between baseline and week 10 were significantly associated with OS (for both, 8.6 months vs not reached, P = 0.031).
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT is a potential biomarker in patients with mRCC. High baseline BF and reductions in BF and BV during early treatment are associated with improved outcome. Large-scale studies are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24691140     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  9 in total

1.  Use of patient outcome endpoints to identify the best functional CT imaging parameters in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Jill Rachel Mains; Frede Donskov; Erik Morre Pedersen; Hans Henrik Torp Madsen; Jesper Thygesen; Kennet Thorup; Finn Rasmussen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Sunitinib side effects as surrogate biomarkers of efficacy.

Authors:  Christian Kollmannsberger
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Evaluation of celiac disease with uniphasic and multiphasic dynamic MDCT imaging.

Authors:  Cemil Göya; İlyas Dündar; Mesut Özgökçe; Saim Türkoğlu; Ensar Türko; Sercan Özkaçmaz; Gülay Aydoğdu; Necat Almalı
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-08-20

Review 4.  The Use of Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Oncology: A Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN) Perspective.

Authors:  Robert H Press; Hui-Kuo G Shu; Hyunsuk Shim; James M Mountz; Brenda F Kurland; Richard L Wahl; Ella F Jones; Nola M Hylton; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Robert J Nordstrom; Lori Henderson; Karen A Kurdziel; Bhadrasain Vikram; Michael A Jacobs; Matthias Holdhoff; Edward Taylor; David A Jaffray; Lawrence H Schwartz; David A Mankoff; Paul E Kinahan; Hannah M Linden; Philippe Lambin; Thomas J Dilling; Daniel L Rubin; Lubomir Hadjiiski; John M Buatti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Sunitinib-associated hypertension and neutropenia as efficacy biomarkers in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Frede Donskov; M Dror Michaelson; Igor Puzanov; Mellar P Davis; Georg A Bjarnason; Robert J Motzer; David Goldstein; Xun Lin; Darrel P Cohen; Robin Wiltshire; Brian I Rini
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Contrast-Enhanced CT Density Predicts Response to Sunitinib Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Simon Matoori; Yeeliang Thian; Dow-Mu Koh; Aslam Sohaib; James Larkin; Lisa Pickering; Andreas Gutzeit
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.243

7.  Baseline blood volume identified by dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography as a new independent prognostic factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Aska Drljevic-Nielsen; Finn Rasmussen; Jill R Mains; Kennet Thorup; Frede Donskov
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Blood Volume as a new functional image-based biomarker of progression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Aska Drljevic-Nielsen; Finn Rasmussen; Jill Rachel Mains; Kennet Thorup; Frede Donskov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Prognostic value of DCE-CT-derived blood volume and flow compared to core biopsy microvessel density in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Aska Drljevic-Nielsen; Finn Rasmussen; Patricia Switten Nielsen; Christina Stilling; Kennet Thorup; Jill Rachel Mains; Hans Henrik Torp Madsen; Frede Donskov
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2021-07-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.