| Literature DB >> 24690380 |
Yasuyuki Ohta, Cyntia Tremblay, Julie A Schneider, David A Bennett, Frederic Calon, Jean-Pierre Julien1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Transactive response DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43) is detected in pathological inclusions in many cases of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but its pathological role in AD and MCI remains unknown. Recently, TDP-43 was reported to contribute to pathogenesis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis through its interaction with p65 nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) resulting in abnormal hyperactivation of this signaling pathway in motor neurons. Hence, we investigated the interaction of TDP-43 with p65 in the temporal cortex of subjects with a clinical diagnosis of MCI (n = 12) or AD (n = 12) as well as of age-matched controls with no cognitive impairment (NCI, n = 12).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24690380 PMCID: PMC4230634 DOI: 10.1186/2051-5960-2-37
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun ISSN: 2051-5960 Impact factor: 7.801
Figure 1Full-length TDP-43 interacts with p65 NF-κB in the temporal cortex of four individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). a The presence of phosphorylated p65 NF-κB at ser536 and accumulation of p65 and full-length of TDP-43 in TBS-soluble fraction from the temporal cortex of individuals with MCI. Protein extracts from the temporal cortex of individuals with no obvious cognitive impairment (NCI; N, n = 12), MCI (M, n = 12) or Alzheimer’s disease (AD; A, n = 12) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Actin was used as a loading control. b, c Interaction of TDP-43 with p65 in TBS-soluble fraction from the temporal cortex of four individuals with MCI (Subjects 8, 15, 17 and 23), one individual with AD (Subject 2) and four individuals with NCI (Subjects 7, 14, 21 and 29). Protein extracts from the temporal cortex of individuals with NCI, MCI or AD were used for immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-p65 polyclonal antibody (b) or anti-TDP-43 polyclonal antibody (c). Immunoprecipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Number of Subjects 8, 15, 17 and 23 is written in red color.
Figure 2TDP-43 colocalizes with p65 in the nucleus of neurons of the temporal cortex of individuals with MCI showing the interaction of TDP-43 with p65 in coimmunoprecipitation experiments (Figure1B, C; MCI-p). a, b A section from the temporal cortex of MCI-p (Subject 15) were incubated with anti-p65 and anti-TDP-43 (a) or anti-NeuN (b) antibodies and subsequently with corresponding Alexa 488 and 633 antibodies (Molecular Probes), and imaged by confocal laser microscopy. The nuclei were counterstained with Dapi. Autofluorescence was detected using 575–630 nm bandpass emission filter. Arrows indicate colocalization of Dapi, p65 and TDP-43 (a) or NeuN (b). Scale bars, 50 μm.
Figure 3TDP-43 colocalizes with p65 in the neuronal cells from the temporal cortex of individuals with MCI-p. a-d Sections from the temporal cortex of MCI-p (a, Subjects 8 and 15), MCI without the interaction of TDP-43 with p65 in coimmunoprecipitation experiments (Figure 1B, C; MCI-n, b, Subjects 6 and 12), AD (c, Subject 2) or NCI (d, Subjects 7 and 21) showing the interaction of TDP-43 with p65 (Figure 1B,C; AD-p or NCI-p) were incubated with anti-TDP-43 and anti-p65 antibodies and subsequently with corresponding Alexa 488 and 633 antibodies, and imaged by confocal laser microscopy. Autofluorescence was detected using 575–630 nm bandpass emission filter. Arrows indicate the nuclear TDP-43 positive cells colocalized with p65 (a). Arrowheads indicate the nuclear TDP-43 positive cells without colocalization with p65 (a-d). Scale bars, 50 μm.
Selected characteristics of subjects from the religious order study with a clinical diagnosis of no cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment, or Alzheimer’s disease
| n | 12 | 8 | 4 | 12 | |
| Men,% | 8.4 | 62.5 | 25.0 | 25.0 | chi square test, |
| Age at death, mean ± SD, y | 85.0 ± 6.0 | 85.1 ± 3.4 | 83.3 ± 4.6 | 86.1 ± 5.8 | K-W test, p = 0.71 |
| Education, mean ± SD, y | 17.5 ± 3.9 | 19.4 ± 2.8 | 20.0 ± 1.6 | 18.0 ± 2.8 | K-W test, p = 0.32 |
| MMSE, mean ± SD | 27.4 ± 2.0 | 26.6 ± 2.3 | 27.5 ± 1.9 | 16.2 ± 8.9***, #, † | K-W test, p < 0.0001 |
| Time since last MMSE, mean ± SD, d | 276 ± 327 | 256 ± 225 | 199 ± 117 | 281 ± 80 | K-W test, p = 0.48 |
| Global cognition score, mean ± SD | −0.12 ± 0.23 | −0.32 ± 0.52 | −0.64 ± 0.31 | −1.75 ± 0.96***, ## | K-W test, p < 0.0001 |
| Episodic memory, mean ± SD | 0.18 ± 0.37 | −0.27 ± 0.54 | −0.96 ± 0.51 | −2.19 ± 1.19***, # | K-W test, p < 0.0001 |
| Semantic memory, mean ± SD | −0.37 ± 0.47 | −0.20 ± 0.59 | −0.43 ± 0.59 | −1.47 ± 1.24# | K-W test, p = 0.015 |
| Working memory, mean ± SD | −0.32 ± 0.42 | −0.19 ± 0.71 | −0.49 ± 0.62 | −1.12 ± 0.88 | K-W test, p = 0.046 |
| Perceptual speed, mean ± SD | −0.29 ± 0.66 | −1.06 ± 0.96 | −0.27 ± 0.66 | −2.08 ± 0.86***, † | K-W test, p = 0.0008 |
| Visuospatial ability, mean ± SD | −0.44 ± 0.63 | −0.10 ± 0.60 | −0.44 ± 0.55 | −1.37 ± 0.93## | K-W test, p = 0.0051 |
| apoE e4 allele carriage,% | 25.0 | 37.5 | 25.0 | 50.0 | chi square test, |
| Cerebellar pH, mean ± SD | 6.36 ± 0.31 | 6.43 ± 0.25 | 6.53 ± 0.11 | 6.49 ± 0.37 | K-W test, p = 0.61 |
| Postmortem delay, mean ± SD, h | 7.4 ± 6.4 | 6.2 ± 3.6 | 5.7 ± 5.6 | 6.3 ± 3.9 | K-W test, p = 0.90 |
| Neuritic plaque counts, mean ± SD | 2.3 ± 2.8 | 6.1 ± 7.0 | 1.8 ± 3.5 | 25.9 ± 26.5** | K-W test, p = 0.0054 |
| Diffuse plaque counts, mean ± SD | 12.3 ± 23.7 | 29.6 ± 29.5 | 9.0 ± 10.5 | 20.4 ± 17.2 | K-W test, p = 0.11 |
| Aβ40 concentration (soluble), mean ± SD | 714.2 ± 1055.3 | 384.2 ± 685.0 | 111.7 ± 47.4 | 480.9 ± 588.0 | K-W test, p = 0.48 |
| Aβ40 concentration (insoluble), mean ± SD | 1929.7 ± 3983.7 | 340.2 ± 672.2 | 42.7 ± 68.6 | 805.4 ± 2294.6 | K-W test, p = 0.25 |
| Aβ42 concentration (soluble), mean ± SD | 2.5 ± 2.5 | 3.7 ± 3.1 | 1.8 ± 2.5 | 4.7 ± 2.9 | K-W test, p = 0.10 |
| Aβ42 concentration (insoluble), mean ± SD | 1021.8 ± 1045.4 | 1312.4 ± 1445.6 | 749.1 ± 918.2 | 2523.2 ± 1609.9* | K-W test, p = 0.023 |
| Neurofibrillary tangle counts, mean ± SD | 0.5 ± 0.7 | 2.1 ± 4.8 | 1.5 ± 1.9 | 8.6 ± 15.0 | K-W test, p = 0.29 |
| Total tau content (soluble), mean ± SD | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | K-W test, p = 0.19 |
| Total tau content (insoluble), mean ± SD | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.9**, † | K-W test, p = 0.0024 |
| Total phospho-tau content (soluble), mean ± SD | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.2 | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.4* | K-W test, p = 0.028 |
| Total phospho-tau content (insoluble), mean ± SD | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 1.2 | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 2.6 * | K-W test, p = 0.029 |
| CERAD score 4/3/2/1 (n) | 3/3/5/1 | 3/0/3/2 | 3/0/1/0 | 0/1/3/8 | n/a |
| Braak score I/II/III/IV/V (n) | 2/0/6/4/0 | 0/0/3/4/1 | 0/0/2/2/0 | 0/0/5/1/6 | n/a |
| Reagan score 3/2/1 (n) | 7/5/0 | 3/4/1 | 3/1/0 | 1/5/6 | n/a |
| Hippocampal atrophy score, mean ± SD | 2.1 ± 1.7 | 2.4 ± 1.3 | 2.7 ± 2.3 | 2.7 ± 1.5 | K-W test, p = 0.81 |
| Full length (43kda) of TDP-43 content (TBS-soluble), mean ± SD | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.7# | 0.3 ± 0.3 | K-W test, p = 0.043 |
| Total p65 content (TBS-soluble), mean ± SD | 0.4 ± 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.3## | 0.4 ± 0.2 | K-W test, p = 0.016 |
| Presence of phospho-p65 content (TBS-soluble),% | 0.0 | 12.5 | 75.0 | 8.3 | chi square test, |
Intergroup comparisons: *, p < 0.05 versus NCI; **, p < 0.01 versus NCI; ***, p < 0.001 versus NCI; #, p < 0.05 versus MCI-n; ##, p < 0.01 versus MCI-n; †, p < 0.05 versus MCI-p.Aβ, beta-amyloid; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; CERAD, Consortium to Establish a Registry for AD; K-W test, Kruskal-Wallis test; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MCI-n, MCI without interaction of TDP-43 and p65; MCI-p, MCI with interaction of TDP-43 and p65; MMSE, Mini Mental State Examination; NCI, no cognitive impairment; SD, standard deviation; TDP-43, Transactive response DNA binding protein 43.
Figure 4MCI-p individuals presented intermediate deficits of episodic memory between those of AD cases and of NCI cases and MCI-n cases. Left graph shows statistical comparisons of episodic memory scores between NCI, MCI-n, MCI-p and AD using Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn multiple comparisons test. Right graph shows statistical comparison of same scores between MCI-n and MCI-p using Mann–Whitney test. Number of Subjects 8, 15, 17 and 23 is written beside each blot in right graph.