Literature DB >> 24689833

Seroprevalence of some vector-borne infections of dogs in Hungary.

Robert Farkas1, Mónika Gyurkovszky, Zoltán Lukács, Balázs Aladics, Norbert Solymosi.   

Abstract

The first comprehensive study on the prevalence of canine vector-borne pathogens (Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi, Ehrlichia canis, and Dirofilaria immitis) was carried in Hungary because, except for babesiosis and dirofilariosis caused by Dirofilaria repens, there were no data on their regional distribution and prevalence. In 2011 and 2012, 1305 blood samples were collected from randomly selected, apparently healthy pet dogs in 167 localities of 19 counties of Hungary. All sera samples from dogs were screened for simultaneous qualitative detection of circulating antibodies to E. canis and B. burgdorferi sensu lato and A. phagocytophilum and D. immitis antigen using SNAP(®) 4Dx (IDEXX Laboratories). Overall, 170 dogs (13.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 11-15) were serologically positive to one or more of the tested pathogens. A. phagocytophilum was the most prevalent pathogen detected in 102 dogs by antibody titers (7.9%, 95% CI 6.5-9.5), followed by D. immitis (2.4%, 95% CI 1.0-4.0, n=64) and B. burgdorferi (0.4%, 95% CI 0.0-1.1, n=11) out of 1305 tested dogs. The least prevalent infection was with E. canis, with only two positive dogs (0.16%, 95% CI 0.03-0.6). Co-infection was found in eight dogs (0.61%, 95% CI 0.29-1.21), of which seven were seropositive to two pathogens (five with A. phagocytophilum and D. immitis, two with A. phagocytophilum and B. burgdorferi). One dog was serologically positive to three pathogens (A. phagocytophilum, B. burgdorferi, and D. immitis). Purebred and crossbred animals did not show significantly different levels of seropositivity. There was no significant association between the gender and the results of diagnostic testing. Logistic regression analysis showed a higher chance of seropositivity in the older dogs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24689833      PMCID: PMC3993034          DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2013.1469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis        ISSN: 1530-3667            Impact factor:   2.133


  27 in total

Review 1.  Arthropod-transmitted diseases of companion animals in Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Peter J Irwin; Ryan Jefferies
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2004-01

Review 2.  One health: the importance of companion animal vector-borne diseases.

Authors:  Michael J Day
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Infections with Anaplasma phagocytophilum in dogs in Germany.

Authors:  B Kohn; C Silaghi; D Galke; G Arndt; K Pfister
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.534

Review 4.  Diagnosis of canine monocytotropic ehrlichiosis (Ehrlichia canis): an overview.

Authors:  Shimon Harrus; Trevor Waner
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.688

5.  Dogs vaccinated with common Lyme disease vaccines do not respond to IR6, the conserved immunodominant region of the VlsE surface protein of Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  Thomas P O'Connor; Kathy J Esty; Jancy L Hanscom; Paulette Shields; Mario T Philipp
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2004-05

6.  Serological reactivity to Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Neorickettsia risticii, Borrelia burgdorferi and Rickettsia conorii in dogs from northwestern Spain.

Authors:  Inmaculada Amusategui; Miguel A Tesouro; Ibulaimu Kakoma; Angel Sainz
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.133

Review 7.  Heartworm disease in animals and humans.

Authors:  John W McCall; Claudio Genchi; Laura H Kramer; Jorge Guerrero; Luigi Venco
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.870

8.  Serological and molecular prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Ehrlichia species in dogs from Minnesota.

Authors:  Melissa J Beall; Ramaswamy Chandrashekar; Matthew D Eberts; Katie E Cyr; Pedro Paulo V P Diniz; Celine Mainville; Barbara C Hegarty; John M Crawford; Edward B Breitschwerdt
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.133

9.  Are vector-borne pathogen co-infections complicating the clinical presentation in dogs?

Authors:  Anna Sara De Tommasi; Domenico Otranto; Filipe Dantas-Torres; Gioia Capelli; Edward B Breitschwerdt; Donato de Caprariis
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Seropositivity rates for agents of canine vector-borne diseases in Spain: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Guadalupe Miró; Ana Montoya; Xavier Roura; Rosa Gálvez; Angel Sainz
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.876

View more
  9 in total

1.  Zoonotic Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia canis, Dirofilaria immitis, Borrelia burgdorferi, and spotted fever group rickettsiae (SFGR) in different types of dogs.

Authors:  Mohammad M Obaidat; Musa A Alshehabat
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Efficacy of fipronil combined with permethrin commercial spot on (Effitix) preventing Culex pipiens from feeding on dogs.

Authors:  Michel Franc; Emmanuel Lienard; Philippe Jacquiet; Stephane Bonneau; Emilie Bouhsira
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 3.  Guideline for veterinary practitioners on canine ehrlichiosis and anaplasmosis in Europe.

Authors:  Ángel Sainz; Xavier Roura; Guadalupe Miró; Agustín Estrada-Peña; Barbara Kohn; Shimon Harrus; Laia Solano-Gallego
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Canine tick-borne diseases in pet dogs from Romania.

Authors:  Martin O Andersson; Conny Tolf; Paula Tamba; Mircea Stefanache; Jonas Waldenström; Gerhard Dobler; Lidia Chițimia-Dobler
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Current trends in canine dirofilariosis in Austria-do we face a pre-endemic status?

Authors:  Karin Sonnberger; Georg G Duscher; Hans-Peter Fuehrer; Michael Leschnik
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 6.  Epidemiological and Clinicopathological Features of Anaplasma phagocytophilum Infection in Dogs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sarah El Hamiani Khatat; Sylvie Daminet; Luc Duchateau; Latifa Elhachimi; Malika Kachani; Hamid Sahibi
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-23

7.  Identification of Ixodes ricinus blood meals using an automated protocol with high resolution melting analysis (HRMA) reveals the importance of domestic dogs as larval tick hosts in Italian alpine forests.

Authors:  Margherita Collini; Francesca Albonico; Roberto Rosà; Valentina Tagliapietra; Daniele Arnoldi; Lorenza Conterno; Chiara Rossi; Michele Mortarino; Annapaola Rizzoli; Heidi Christine Hauffe
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  The current situation of canine dirofilariosis in Hungary.

Authors:  Róbert Farkas; Viktória Mag; Mónika Gyurkovszky; Nóra Takács; Károly Vörös; Norbert Solymosi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.289

9.  The Incidence of Dirofilaria immitis in Shelter Dogs and Mosquitoes in Austria.

Authors:  Karin Sonnberger; Hans-Peter Fuehrer; Bernhard Werner Sonnberger; Michael Leschnik
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-05-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.