Abdolreza Shaghaghi1, Raj S Bhopal2, Aziz Sheikh3. 1. Department of Medical Education Research Centre, R & D Campus, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran ; Department of Health Education & Promotion, School of Health & Nutrition, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. 2. Bruce and John Usher Professor of Public Health, Edinburgh Ethnicity and Health Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK. 3. Department of Primary Care Research & Development, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 'Hard-to-reach' is a term used to describe those sub-groups of the population that may be difficult to reach or involve in research or public health programmes. Application of a single term to call these sub-sections of populations implies a homogeneity within distinct groups, which does not necessarily exist. Different sampling techniques were introduced so far to recruit hard-to-reach populations. In this article, we have reviewed a range of ap-proaches that have been used to widen participation in studies. METHODS: We performed a Pubmed and Google search for relevant English language articles using the keywords and phrases: (hard-to-reach AND population* OR sampl*), (hidden AND population* OR sample*) and ("hard to reach" AND population* OR sample*) and a consul-tation of the retrieved articles' bibliographies to extract empirical evidence from publications that discussed or examined the use of sampling techniques to recruit hidden or hard-to-reach populations in health studies. RESULTS: Reviewing the literature has identified a range of techniques to recruit hard-to-reach populations, including snowball sampling, respondent-driven sampling (RDS), indigenous field worker sampling (IFWS), facility-based sampling (FBS), targeted sampling (TS), time-location (space) sampling (TLS), conventional cluster sampling (CCS) and capture re-capture sampling (CR). CONCLUSION: The degree of compliance with a study by a certain 'hard-to-reach' group de-pends on the characteristics of that group, recruitment technique used and the subject of inter-est. Irrespective of potential advantages or limitations of the recruitment techniques reviewed, their successful use depends mainly upon our knowledge about specific characteristics of the target populations. Thus in line with attempts to expand the current boundaries of our know-ledge about recruitment techniques in health studies and their applications in varying situa-tions, we should also focus on possibly all contributing factors which may have an impact on participation rate within a defined population group.
BACKGROUND: 'Hard-to-reach' is a term used to describe those sub-groups of the population that may be difficult to reach or involve in research or public health programmes. Application of a single term to call these sub-sections of populations implies a homogeneity within distinct groups, which does not necessarily exist. Different sampling techniques were introduced so far to recruit hard-to-reach populations. In this article, we have reviewed a range of ap-proaches that have been used to widen participation in studies. METHODS: We performed a Pubmed and Google search for relevant English language articles using the keywords and phrases: (hard-to-reach AND population* OR sampl*), (hidden AND population* OR sample*) and ("hard to reach" AND population* OR sample*) and a consul-tation of the retrieved articles' bibliographies to extract empirical evidence from publications that discussed or examined the use of sampling techniques to recruit hidden or hard-to-reach populations in health studies. RESULTS: Reviewing the literature has identified a range of techniques to recruit hard-to-reach populations, including snowball sampling, respondent-driven sampling (RDS), indigenous field worker sampling (IFWS), facility-based sampling (FBS), targeted sampling (TS), time-location (space) sampling (TLS), conventional cluster sampling (CCS) and capture re-capture sampling (CR). CONCLUSION: The degree of compliance with a study by a certain 'hard-to-reach' group de-pends on the characteristics of that group, recruitment technique used and the subject of inter-est. Irrespective of potential advantages or limitations of the recruitment techniques reviewed, their successful use depends mainly upon our knowledge about specific characteristics of the target populations. Thus in line with attempts to expand the current boundaries of our know-ledge about recruitment techniques in health studies and their applications in varying situa-tions, we should also focus on possibly all contributing factors which may have an impact on participation rate within a defined population group.
Authors: Carl Kendall; Ligia R F S Kerr; Rogerio C Gondim; Guilherme L Werneck; Raimunda Hermelinda Maia Macena; Marta Kerr Pontes; Lisa G Johnston; Keith Sabin; Willi McFarland Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2008-04-04
Authors: Bryan E Shepherd; Anthony J Rossini; Ramon Jeremias Soto; Ivette Lorenzana De Rivera; James I Mullins Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Scott Geibel; Elisabeth M van der Elst; Nzioki King'ola; Stanley Luchters; Alun Davies; Esther M Getambu; Norbert Peshu; Susan M Graham; R Scott McClelland; Eduard J Sanders Journal: AIDS Date: 2007-06-19 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Lucy Platt; Martin Wall; Tim Rhodes; Ali Judd; Matthew Hickman; Lisa G Johnston; Adrian Renton; Natalia Bobrova; Anya Sarang Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Geoffrey V Gill; Aziz A Ismail; Nicholas J Beeching; Sarah B J Macfarlane; Mark A Bellis Journal: J R Soc Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 18.000
Authors: B Hensen; C R S Mackworth-Young; M Simwinga; N Abdelmagid; J Banda; C Mavodza; A M Doyle; C Bonell; H A Weiss Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2021-02-07 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Roxanne Kerani; Masahiro Narita; Lauren Lipira; Meheret Endeshaw; King K Holmes; Matthew R Golden Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2019-06
Authors: Ana Cristina Lindsay; Sherrie F Wallington; Luísa M Rabello; Amanda De Sá Melo Alves; Carlos André Moura Arruda; Thaís C Rocha; Gabriela P De Andrade; Gabriela V B Vianna; Raquel de Souza Mezzavilla; Mariana Gonçalves de Oliveira; Maria Helena Hasselmann; Márcia M T Machado; Mary L Greaney Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2020-05-26