| Literature DB >> 24688531 |
Manuella Nóbrega Dourado1, Andrea Cristina Bogas1, Armando M Pomini2, Fernando Dini Andreote3, Maria Carolina Quecine1, Anita J Marsaioli4, Welington Luiz Araújo5.
Abstract
Bacteria from the genus Methylobacterium interact symbiotically (endophytically and epiphytically) with different plant species. These interactions can promote plant growth or induce systemic resistance, increasing plant fitness. The plant colonization is guided by molecular communication between bacteria-bacteria and bacteria-plants, where the bacteria recognize specific exuded compounds by other bacteria (e.g. homoserine molecules) and/or by the plant roots (e.g. flavonoids, ethanol and methanol), respectively. In this context, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of quorum sensing molecules (N-acyl-homoserine lactones) and plant exudates (including ethanol) in the expression of a series of bacterial genes involved in Methylobacterium-plant interaction. The selected genes are related to bacterial metabolism (mxaF), adaptation to stressful environment (crtI, phoU and sss), to interactions with plant metabolism compounds (acdS) and pathogenicity (patatin and phoU). Under in vitro conditions, our results showed the differential expression of some important genes related to metabolism, stress and pathogenesis, thereby AHL molecules up-regulate all tested genes, except phoU, while plant exudates induce only mxaF gene expression. In the presence of plant exudates there is a lower bacterial density (due the endophytic and epiphytic colonization), which produce less AHL, leading to down regulation of genes when compared to the control. Therefore, bacterial density, more than plant exudate, influences the expression of genes related to plant-bacteria interaction.Entities:
Keywords: Methylobacterium; endophyte; homoserine; plant-bacteria Interaction; quantitative PCR (qPCR)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24688531 PMCID: PMC3958207 DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822013000400044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Sequencing of designed primers to evaluate the gene expression of the endophytic bacterium M. mesophilicum SR1.6/6 in plants.
| Primer | Target gene | Sequencing (5′-3′) | Fragment length | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGTCAACGTCATGATGCT(C/G)T | 250 pb | This study | ||
| GATGTCCTTGGCGAG(A/G)TG | This study | |||
| ACC Met1 f | GACCGGGTCGGCAACATC | 200 pb | This study | |
| ACC Met2 r | AGCCCGCCGTACTTGTGC | This study | ||
| CTTCAACGCCAACCTGATG | 250 pb | This study | ||
| CCGATCCGCTCGTAGTTCT | This study | |||
| PhyF | AATACTTCAAGCCGGTGCTG | 186 pb | This study | |
| PhyR | GACATGCCGAGGTACTTGGT | This study | ||
| ATCGACGCCCTGTACAATTC | 221 pb | This study | ||
| ACCGTCGCGTAGTTCGAC | This study | |||
| TTCGACGGGCTGATCTACTC | 189 pb | This study | ||
| GATCAGGTAGAAGGCCACCA | This study | |||
| recAF | CGAACTGCATGGTC(G)ATCTTC | 232 pb | This study | |
| recAR | ATGTCGAACTCGACCTGCTT ′ | This study | ||
| zwfrF | AGCAGCTGGAACATGTGGTT | 231 pb | This study | |
| zwfrR | CGACGAGAGCCAGTTCTACC | This study | ||
| rpoDrF | ACGACCTCGAGAACAACGTC | 229 pb | This study | |
| rpoDrR | ACGACCTCGAGAACAACGTC | This study | ||
| proCF | proC | CCAGCAGGAAGACGTAGGC | 282 pb | This study |
| proCR | ACACGCTCCTCGTCTCGAT | This study | ||
| MMC1 | 16S | TACGTGGAGAGATTCACGGTC | 390 pb | Lacava |
| MMC2 | GTACAAGGCCCGGGAACGTAC | Lacava |
Isolates of Methylobacterium spp. and other genera from different plant hosts, identified by partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and used to evaluate primers specificity.
| Isolate | Host plant | Genes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| Coffee | + | − | + | − | + | + | + | |
| Coffee | + | − | + | − | + | + | + | |
| Sugarcane | + | − | + | − | + | + | + | |
| Sugarcane | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Sugarcane | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | |
| Sugarcane | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | |
| Citrus | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Citrus | + | − | − | − | + | + | + | |
| Citrus | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | |
| Citrus | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | |
| Sweet peper | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | |
| Sweet peper | + | − | + | − | + | + | + | |
| + | − | − | − | − | + | + | ||
| + | + | + | − | + | + | + | ||
| + | + | − | + | + | + | + | ||
| + | − | + | − | + | − | + | ||
| + | − | − | − | − | − | − | ||
| Laboratory collection | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | |
| Laboratory collection | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| Laboratory collection | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | |
| Total of 20 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 5 | 15 | 15 | 14 | |
Figure 1Relative effects of ethanol, plant exudates and AHL on SR1.6/6 transcription of plant-interaction genes: mxaF (A), patatin(B), acdS (C), phoU (D), crtI (E) and sss (F). The gene expression ration were determined by the method of Pfaffl. The recA as a reference gene. The results are means +/-standard errors of three replicates. Values of asterisks (* or **) differ statistically of control treatment (a = 0.05 and 0.01 respectively) according to t test of Student.