| Literature DB >> 24688519 |
Renata Oliveira Soares1, Maíra Bidart de Macedo1, Andrea von Groll1, Pedro Eduardo Almeida da Silva1.
Abstract
A sublineage of Mycobacterium tuberculosis called RD(Rio) was described in 2007. Although only recently described, this strain may have been present previously in the population, and its identification in clinical isolates will elucidate bacterial transmission dynamics and host-pathogen interactions. This study evaluated the clonal diversity of the RD(Rio) sublineage in clinical isolates from Rio Grande-RS obtained between 1998 and 2001. Among the 45 samples analyzed by the MIRU-VNTR method, there were six clusters with two samples each and 33 orphan strains with unique pattern. The strains were distributed across several different lineages including LAM (34.04%), × (14.89%), Haarlem (12.77%), UgandaI (10.64%), S (4.26%), NEW-1 (2.13%) and Cameroon (2.13%); 14.89% of the strains matched to multiple lineages. RD(Rio) strains were present in 28.9% of the samples and 81.25% of the identified strains belonged to the LAM family. The high clonal diversity observed in this study is a constant feature in this region. The RD(Rio) sublineage has been in Rio Grande-RS since 1998. The continued monitoring of RD(Rio) in clinical isolates will enhance the understanding of its epidemiological significance.Entities:
Keywords: MIRU-VNTR; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; RDRio
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24688519 PMCID: PMC3958195 DOI: 10.1590/s1517-83822013000400032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Figure 1Dendrogram of genetic relationships between 45 isolates of M. tuberculosis, as determined by MIRU-VNTR 12 loci analysis.
MIRU-VNTR Allelic distribution in 45 isolates
| Variation lélica | Locus | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||||||
| 2 | 4 | 10 | 16 | 20 | 23 | 24 | 26 | 27 | 31 | 39 | 40 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| 2 | 40 | 43 | 3 | 16 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 44 | 11 |
| 3 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 32 | 32 | 1 | 13 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 27 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Allelic diversity (h) | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0 | 0.59 | 0 | 0.57 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 0.74 |
| ID | Low | Low | High | High | Low | Mod. | Low | Mod. | Mod. | Mod. | Low | High |
h = 1 − ∑ xi2 [n/(n − 1)].
The power of Discriminatory Index is defined as: High (≥ 0.6), Moderate (< 0.6 and ≥ 0.3) and Low (< 0.3).