Brian M Sandroff1, Lara A Pilutti1, Deirdre Dlugonski1, Yvonne C Learmonth1, John H Pula1, Robert W Motl1. 1. Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA (BMS, LAP, DD, YCL, RWM); and Division of Neuro-ophthalmology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria and the Illinois Neurologic Institute, Peoria, IL, USA (JHP).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This quasi-experimental study was conducted to determine whether differences existed in the total distance walked and energy expended between two conditions of administering the 6-Minute Walk test (6MW) across different levels of disability in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: The sample comprised 160 individuals with MS. One group of participants (n = 82) completed a 6MW while wearing a portable metabolic unit (K4b(2), Cosmed, Italy) in a square hallway with four corridors and performing 90° turns. Another group (n = 78) completed a 6MW while wearing the same metabolic unit in a single corridor and performing 180° turns. Main outcome measures included total distance walked (in feet) and oxygen consumption (in milliliters per minute) expressed as 30-second averages for 1 minute before the 6MW and over the entire 6MW. Disability status was assessed using the Patient-Determined Disease Steps scale. RESULTS: Participants undertaking the 6MW in a single corridor (1412 ft) walked 37 ft (2.7%) farther than those undertaking the test in a square hallway (1375 ft), but this difference was not statistically significant (F = 0.45, P = .51). Those completing the 6MW in a single corridor expended more energy than those completing the 6MW in the square hallway with four corridors (F = 3.41, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Either protocol is acceptable, but researchers should be aware of the additional physiological demands when administering the 6MW in a single corridor with 180° turns.
OBJECTIVE: This quasi-experimental study was conducted to determine whether differences existed in the total distance walked and energy expended between two conditions of administering the 6-Minute Walk test (6MW) across different levels of disability in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: The sample comprised 160 individuals with MS. One group of participants (n = 82) completed a 6MW while wearing a portable metabolic unit (K4b(2), Cosmed, Italy) in a square hallway with four corridors and performing 90° turns. Another group (n = 78) completed a 6MW while wearing the same metabolic unit in a single corridor and performing 180° turns. Main outcome measures included total distance walked (in feet) and oxygen consumption (in milliliters per minute) expressed as 30-second averages for 1 minute before the 6MW and over the entire 6MW. Disability status was assessed using the Patient-Determined Disease Steps scale. RESULTS:Participants undertaking the 6MW in a single corridor (1412 ft) walked 37 ft (2.7%) farther than those undertaking the test in a square hallway (1375 ft), but this difference was not statistically significant (F = 0.45, P = .51). Those completing the 6MW in a single corridor expended more energy than those completing the 6MW in the square hallway with four corridors (F = 3.41, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Either protocol is acceptable, but researchers should be aware of the additional physiological demands when administering the 6MW in a single corridor with 180° turns.
Authors: C Heesen; J Segal; C Reich; P Hämäläinen; F Broemel; S Niemann; U Simon; R Gross; J Kasper Journal: Acta Neurol Scand Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 3.209
Authors: Frank Sciurba; Gerard J Criner; Shing M Lee; Zab Mohsenifar; David Shade; William Slivka; Robert A Wise Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-02-20 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Anthony Feinstein; Maria Pia Amato; Giampaolo Brichetto; Jeremy Chataway; Nancy Chiaravalloti; Ulrik Dalgas; John DeLuca; Peter Feys; Massimo Filippi; Jennifer Freeman; Cecilia Meza; Matilde Inglese; Robert W Motl; Maria Assunta Rocca; Brian M Sandroff; Amber Salter; Gary Cutter Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 2.474