Literature DB >> 24688128

Day-to-day variability in home blood pressure is associated with cognitive decline: the Ohasama study.

Akihiro Matsumoto1, Michihiro Satoh, Masahiro Kikuya, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Mikio Hirano, Ryusuke Inoue, Takanao Hashimoto, Azusa Hara, Takuo Hirose, Taku Obara, Hirohito Metoki, Kei Asayama, Aya Hosokawa, Kazuhito Totsune, Haruhisa Hoshi, Toru Hosokawa, Hiroshi Sato, Yutaka Imai.   

Abstract

Although an association between high blood pressure and cognitive decline has been reported, no studies have investigated the association between home blood pressure and cognitive decline. Home blood pressure measurements can also provide day-to-day blood pressure variability calculated as the within-participant SD. The objectives of this prospective study were to clarify whether home blood pressure has a stronger predictive power for cognitive decline than conventional blood pressure and to compare the predictive power of the averaged home blood pressure with day-to-day home blood pressure variability for cognitive decline. Of 485 participants (mean age, 63 years) who did not have cognitive decline (defined as Mini-Mental State Examination score, <24) initially, 46 developed cognitive decline after a median follow-up of 7.8 years. Each 1-SD increase in the home systolic blood pressure value showed a significant association with cognitive decline (odds ratio, 1.48; P=0.03). However, conventional systolic blood pressure was not significantly associated with cognitive decline (odds ratio, 1.24; P=0.2). The day-to-day variability in systolic blood pressure was significantly associated with cognitive decline after including home systolic blood pressure in the same model (odds ratio, 1.51; P=0.02), whereas the odds ratio of home systolic blood pressure remained positive, but it was not significant. Home blood pressure measurements can be useful for predicting future cognitive decline because they can provide information not only on blood pressure values but also on day-to-day blood pressure variability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; cohort studies; mild cognitive impairment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24688128     DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  29 in total

1.  Measurement-to-measurement blood pressure variability is related to cognitive performance: the Maine Syracuse study.

Authors:  Georgina E Crichton; Merrill F Elias; Gregory A Dore; Rachael V Torres; Michael A Robbins
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 2.  Hypertension and Stroke: Epidemiological Aspects and Clinical Evaluation.

Authors:  Francesca Pistoia; Simona Sacco; Diana Degan; Cindy Tiseo; Raffaele Ornello; Antonio Carolei
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2015-07-10

3.  Blood Pressure Variability and Cognitive Function Among Older African Americans: Introducing a New Blood Pressure Variability Measure.

Authors:  Siny Tsang; Scott A Sperling; Moon Ho Park; Ira M Helenius; Ishan C Williams; Carol Manning
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Blood pressure variability and brain morphology in elderly women without cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Bernhard Haring; Jingmin Liu; Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher; Kathleen M Hayden; Gloria Sarto; Jacques Roussouw; Lew H Kuller; Steve R Rapp; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Effectiveness of Fixed-Dose Perindopril/Amlodipine on Clinic, Ambulatory and Self-Monitored Blood Pressure and Blood Pressure Variability: An Open-Label, Non Comparative Study in the General Practice.

Authors:  Yuri A Karpov; Vladimir M Gorbunov; Alexander D Deev
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2015-09-09

Review 6.  Blood pressure (BP) assessment-from BP level to BP variability.

Authors:  Janusz Feber; Mieczyslaw Litwin
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Recent status of self-measured home blood pressure in the Japanese general population: a modern database on self-measured home blood pressure (MDAS).

Authors:  Kei Asayama; Yasuharu Tabara; Emi Oishi; Satoko Sakata; Takashi Hisamatsu; Kayo Godai; Mai Kabayama; Yukako Tatsumi; Jun Hata; Masahiro Kikuya; Kei Kamide; Katsuyuki Miura; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Takayoshi Ohkubo
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.872

8.  Excessive variability in systolic blood pressure that is self-measured at home exacerbates the progression of brain white matter lesions and cognitive impairment in the oldest old.

Authors:  Zhendong Liu; Yingxin Zhao; Hua Zhang; Qiang Chai; Yi Cui; Yutao Diao; Jianchao Xiu; Xiaolin Sun; Guosheng Jiang
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.872

9.  Differences in the association between high blood pressure and cognitive functioning among the general Japanese population aged 70 and 80 years: The SONIC study.

Authors:  Hirochika Ryuno; Kei Kamide; Yasuyuki Gondo; Chikako Nakama; Ryosuke Oguro; Mai Kabayama; Tatsuo Kawai; Hiroshi Kusunoki; Serina Yokoyama; Yuki Imaizumi; Miyuki Takeya; Hiroko Yamamoto; Masao Takeda; Yoichi Takami; Norihisa Itoh; Koichi Yamamoto; Yasushi Takeya; Ken Sugimoto; Takeshi Nakagawa; Kazunori Ikebe; Hiroki Inagaki; Yukie Masui; Tatsuro Ishizaki; Michiyo Takayama; Yasumichi Arai; Ryutaro Takahashi; Hiromi Rakugi
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.872

10.  Blood pressure variability and neurocognitive functioning.

Authors:  Simona Lattanzi; Fabrizio Vernieri; Mauro Silvestrini
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.