Literature DB >> 24687952

Mutant p53 accumulation in human breast cancer is not an intrinsic property or dependent on structural or functional disruption but is regulated by exogenous stress and receptor status.

Pavla Bouchalova1, Rudolf Nenutil, Petr Muller, Roman Hrstka, M Virginia Appleyard, Karen Murray, Lee B Jordan, Colin A Purdie, Philip Quinlan, Alastair M Thompson, Borivoj Vojtesek, Philip J Coates.   

Abstract

Many human cancers contain missense TP53 mutations that result in p53 protein accumulation. Although generally considered as a single class of mutations that abrogate wild-type function, individual TP53 mutations may have specific properties and prognostic effects. Tumours that contain missense TP53 mutations show variable p53 stabilization patterns, which may reflect the specific mutation and/or aspects of tumour biology. We used immunohistochemistry on cell lines and human breast cancers with known TP53 missense mutations and assessed the effects of each mutation with four structure-function prediction methods. Cell lines with missense TP53 mutations show variable percentages of cells with p53 stabilization under normal growth conditions, ranging from approximately 50% to almost 100%. Stabilization is not related to structural or functional disruption, but agents that stabilize wild-type p53 increase the percentages of cells showing missense mutant p53 accumulation in cell lines with heterogeneous stabilization. The same heterogeneity of p53 stabilization occurs in primary breast cancers, independent of the effect of the mutation on structural properties or functional disruption. Heterogeneous accumulation is more common in steroid receptor-positive or HER2-positive breast cancers and cell lines than in triple-negative samples. Immunohistochemcal staining patterns associate with Mdm2 levels, proliferation, grade and overall survival, whilst the type of mutation reflects downstream target activity. Inhibiting Mdm2 activity increases the extent of p53 stabilization in some, but not all, breast cancer cell lines. The data indicate that missense mutant p53 stabilization is a complex and variable process in human breast cancers that associates with disease characteristics but is unrelated to structural or functional properties. That agents which stabilize wild-type p53 also stabilize mutant p53 has implications for patients with heterogeneous mutant p53 accumulation, where therapy may activate mutant p53 oncogenic function.
Copyright © 2014 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; immunohistochemistry; mutation; p53; therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24687952     DOI: 10.1002/path.4356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  13 in total

1.  Fascin expression predicts an aggressive clinical course in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Kyueng-Whan Min; Seoung Wan Chae; Dong-Hoon Kim; Sung-Im DO; Kyungeun Kim; Hyun Joo Lee; Jin Hee Sohn; Jung-Soo Pyo; Dong Hyun Kim; Sukjoong Oh; Seon Hyeong Choi; Yong Lai Park; Chan Heun Park
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  Is loss of p53 a driver of ductal carcinoma in situ progression?

Authors:  Rhiannon L Morrissey; Alastair M Thompson; Guillermina Lozano
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  AGR2 oncoprotein inhibits p38 MAPK and p53 activation through a DUSP10-mediated regulatory pathway.

Authors:  Roman Hrstka; Pavla Bouchalova; Eva Michalova; Eva Matoulkova; Petr Muller; Philip J Coates; Borivoj Vojtesek
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Mechanical cues control mutant p53 stability through a mevalonate-RhoA axis.

Authors:  Eleonora Ingallina; Giovanni Sorrentino; Rebecca Bertolio; Kamil Lisek; Alessandro Zannini; Luca Azzolin; Luisa Ulloa Severino; Denis Scaini; Miguel Mano; Fiamma Mantovani; Antonio Rosato; Silvio Bicciato; Stefano Piccolo; Giannino Del Sal
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 28.824

5.  Prognostic value of p53 expression in hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Loai Saleh Albinsaad; Jisun Kim; Il Yong Chung; Beom Seok Ko; Hee Jeong Kim; Jong Won Lee; Byung Ho Son; Sei-Hyun Ahn; Sae Byul Lee
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Rearrangement of mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase subunit dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase protein-protein interactions by the MDM2 ligand nutlin-3.

Authors:  Luke Way; Jakub Faktor; Petra Dvorakova; Judith Nicholson; Borek Vojtesek; Duncan Graham; Kathryn L Ball; Ted Hupp
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Wild-type p53 oligomerizes more efficiently than p53 hot-spot mutants and overcomes mutant p53 gain-of-function via a "dominant-positive" mechanism.

Authors:  Dawid Walerych; Magdalena Pruszko; Lukasz Zyla; Michalina Wezyk; Katarzyna Gaweda-Walerych; Alicja Zylicz
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-08-10

8.  ∆Np63/p40 correlates with the location and phenotype of basal/mesenchymal cancer stem-like cells in human ER+ and HER2+ breast cancers.

Authors:  Yajing Liu; Marta Nekulova; Rudolf Nenutil; Iva Horakova; M Virginia Appleyard; Karen Murray; Jitka Holcakova; Michaela Galoczova; Philip Quinlan; Lee B Jordan; Colin A Purdie; Borivoj Vojtesek; Alastair M Thompson; Philip J Coates
Journal:  J Pathol Clin Res       Date:  2019-12-06

9.  Immunohistochemical correlates of TP53 somatic mutations in cancer.

Authors:  Balázs Murnyák; Tibor Hortobágyi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-04

10.  Nerve Growth Factor (NGF)-Receptor Survival Axis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  József Dudás; Wolfgang Dietl; Angela Romani; Susanne Reinold; Rudolf Glueckert; Anneliese Schrott-Fischer; Daniel Dejaco; Lejo Johnson Chacko; Raphaela Tuertscher; Volker Hans Schartinger; Herbert Riechelmann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.