Literature DB >> 24687923

Zoledronic acid has differential antitumor activity in the pre- and postmenopausal bone microenvironment in vivo.

Penelope D Ottewell1, Ning Wang2, Hannah K Brown2, Kimberly J Reeves2, C Anne Fowles2, Peter I Croucher2, Colby L Eaton2, Ingunn Holen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical trials in early breast cancer have suggested that benefits of adjuvant bone-targeted treatments are restricted to women with established menopause. We developed models that mimic pre- and postmenopausal status to investigate effects of altered bone turnover on growth of disseminated breast tumor cells. Here, we report a differential antitumor effect of zoledronic acid (ZOL) in these two settings. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Twleve-week-old female Balb/c-nude mice with disseminated MDA-MB-231 breast tumor cells in bone underwent sham operation or ovariectomy (OVX), mimicking the pre- and postmenopausal bone microenvironment, respectively. To determine the effects of bone-targeted therapy, sham/OVX animals received saline or 100 μg/kg ZOL weekly. Tumor growth was assessed by in vivo imaging and effects on bone by real-time PCR, micro-CT, histomorphometry, and measurements of bone markers. Disseminated tumor cells were detected by two-photon microscopy.
RESULTS: OVX increased bone resorption and induced growth of disseminated tumor cells in bone. Tumors were detected in 83% of animals following OVX (postmenopausal model) compared with 17% following sham operation (premenopausal model). OVX had no effect on tumors outside of bone. OVX-induced tumor growth was completely prevented by ZOL, despite the presence of disseminated tumor cells. ZOL did not affect tumor growth in bone in the sham-operated animals. ZOL increased bone volume in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration that tumor growth is driven by osteoclast-mediated mechanisms in models that mimic post- but not premenopausal bone, providing a biologic rationale for the differential antitumor effects of ZOL reported in these settings. Clin Cancer Res; 20(11); 2922-32. ©2014 AACR. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24687923      PMCID: PMC4040234          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  28 in total

Review 1.  Dormancy of solitary metastatic cells.

Authors:  Jason L Townson; Ann F Chambers
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  The relationship between bone, hemopoietic stem cells, and vasculature.

Authors:  Sarah L Ellis; Jochen Grassinger; Allan Jones; Judy Borg; Todd Camenisch; David Haylock; Ivan Bertoncello; Susan K Nilsson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation.

Authors:  D L Lacey; E Timms; H L Tan; M J Kelley; C R Dunstan; T Burgess; R Elliott; A Colombero; G Elliott; S Scully; H Hsu; J Sullivan; N Hawkins; E Davy; C Capparelli; A Eli; Y X Qian; S Kaufman; I Sarosi; V Shalhoub; G Senaldi; J Guo; J Delaney; W J Boyle
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-04-17       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density.

Authors:  W S Simonet; D L Lacey; C R Dunstan; M Kelley; M S Chang; R Lüthy; H Q Nguyen; S Wooden; L Bennett; T Boone; G Shimamoto; M DeRose; R Elliott; A Colombero; H L Tan; G Trail; J Sullivan; E Davy; N Bucay; L Renshaw-Gegg; T M Hughes; D Hill; W Pattison; P Campbell; S Sander; G Van; J Tarpley; P Derby; R Lee; W J Boyle
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-04-18       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee.

Authors:  A M Parfitt; M K Drezner; F H Glorieux; J A Kanis; H Malluche; P J Meunier; S M Ott; R R Recker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Interference with the microenvironmental support impairs the de novo formation of bone metastases in vivo.

Authors:  Gabri van der Pluijm; Ivo Que; Bianca Sijmons; Jeroen T Buijs; Clemens W G M Löwik; Antoinette Wetterwald; George N Thalmann; Socrates E Papapoulos; Marco G Cecchini
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Extracellular matrix: a gatekeeper in the transition from dormancy to metastatic growth.

Authors:  Dalit Barkan; Jeffrey E Green; Ann F Chambers
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase in bone and cartilage following decalcification and cold-embedding in plastic.

Authors:  A A Cole; L M Walters
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.479

9.  The Wnt antagonist Dickkopf-1 mobilizes vasculogenic progenitor cells via activation of the bone marrow endosteal stem cell niche.

Authors:  Alexandra Aicher; Orit Kollet; Christopher Heeschen; Stefan Liebner; Carmen Urbich; Christian Ihling; Alessia Orlandi; Tsvee Lapidot; Andreas M Zeiher; Stefanie Dimmeler
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Gene expression profiling in bone tissue of osteoporotic mice.

Authors:  Iva Orlić; Fran Borovecki; Petra Simić; Slobodan Vukicević
Journal:  Arh Hig Rada Toksikol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.948

View more
  70 in total

Review 1.  Omentum and bone marrow: how adipocyte-rich organs create tumour microenvironments conducive for metastatic progression.

Authors:  H Chkourko Gusky; J Diedrich; O A MacDougald; I Podgorski
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 9.213

Review 2.  Antiresorptive agents' bone-protective and adjuvant effects in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Tariq Chukir; Yi Liu; Azeez Farooki
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Molecular alterations that drive breast cancer metastasis to bone.

Authors:  Penelope D Ottewell; Liam O'Donnell; Ingunn Holen
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2015-03-18

4.  Confocal/two-photon microscopy in studying colonisation of cancer cells in bone using xenograft mouse models.

Authors:  Gloria Allocca; Anjali P Kusumbe; Saravana K Ramasamy; Ning Wang
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2016-12-07

5.  Mechanical Heterogeneity in the Bone Microenvironment as Characterized by Atomic Force Microscopy.

Authors:  Xinyue Chen; Russell Hughes; Nic Mullin; Rhoda J Hawkins; Ingunn Holen; Nicola J Brown; Jamie K Hobbs
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  The skeletal impact of the chemotherapeutic agent etoposide.

Authors:  A J Koh; B P Sinder; P Entezami; L Nilsson; L K McCauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Zoledronate can promote apoptosis and inhibit the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Bo Jiang; Shitao Zou; Ting Zhang; Xiaowei Qi; Linfang Jin; Xiaosong Ge; Shou-Ching Tang; Dong Hua; Weichang Chen
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-02-15

8.  Pitfalls in bone density monitoring in prostate cancer during anti-resorptive treatment.

Authors:  Y-M Cheung; S K Ramchand; M Grossmann
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Skeletal impact of 17β-estradiol in T cell-deficient mice: age-dependent bone effects and osteosarcoma formation.

Authors:  Julia N Cheng; Jennifer B Frye; Susan A Whitman; Janet L Funk
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  The microenvironment matters: estrogen deficiency fuels cancer bone metastases.

Authors:  Laura E Wright; Theresa A Guise
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.