BACKGROUND: Precision (Personalized) medicine has the potential to revolutionize patient health care especially for many cancers where the fundamental disease etiology remains either elusive or has no available therapy. Here we outline a study in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, in which we use gene expression profiling and a series of drug prediction algorithms combined with a matched patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model to test bioinformatically predicted therapies. PROCEDURE: A PDX model was developed from a patient biopsy and a number of drugs identified using gene expression analysis in combination with drug prediction algorithms. Drugs chosen from each of the predictive methodologies, along with the patient's standard-of-care therapy (ICE-T), were tested in vivo in the PDX tumor. A second study was initiated using the tumors that re-grew following the ICE-T treatment. Further expression analysis identified additional therapies with potential anti-tumor efficacy. RESULTS: A number of the predicted therapies were found to be active against the tumors in particular BGJ398 (FGFR2) and ICE-T. Re-transplanted ICE-T treated tumorgrafts demonstrated a decreased response to ICE-T recapitulating the patient's refractory disease. Gene expression profiling of the ICE-T treated tumorgrafts identified cytarabine (SLC29A1) as a potential therapy, which was shown, along with BGJ398, to be highly active in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates that PDX models are suitable surrogates for testing potential therapeutic strategies based on gene expression analysis, modeling clinical drug resistance and hold the potential to assist in guiding prospective patient care.
BACKGROUND: Precision (Personalized) medicine has the potential to revolutionize patient health care especially for many cancers where the fundamental disease etiology remains either elusive or has no available therapy. Here we outline a study in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma, in which we use gene expression profiling and a series of drug prediction algorithms combined with a matched patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model to test bioinformatically predicted therapies. PROCEDURE: A PDX model was developed from a patient biopsy and a number of drugs identified using gene expression analysis in combination with drug prediction algorithms. Drugs chosen from each of the predictive methodologies, along with the patient's standard-of-care therapy (ICE-T), were tested in vivo in the PDX tumor. A second study was initiated using the tumors that re-grew following the ICE-T treatment. Further expression analysis identified additional therapies with potential anti-tumor efficacy. RESULTS: A number of the predicted therapies were found to be active against the tumors in particular BGJ398 (FGFR2) and ICE-T. Re-transplanted ICE-T treated tumorgrafts demonstrated a decreased response to ICE-T recapitulating the patient's refractory disease. Gene expression profiling of the ICE-T treated tumorgrafts identified cytarabine (SLC29A1) as a potential therapy, which was shown, along with BGJ398, to be highly active in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates that PDX models are suitable surrogates for testing potential therapeutic strategies based on gene expression analysis, modeling clinical drug resistance and hold the potential to assist in guiding prospective patient care.
Authors: P Zarzosa; N Navarro; I Giralt; C Molist; A Almazán-Moga; I Vidal; A Soriano; M F Segura; R Hladun; A Villanueva; S Gallego; J Roma Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Tara A Russell; Mark A Eckardt; Takashi Murakami; Irmina A Elliott; Kei Kawaguchi; Tasuku Kiyuna; Kentaro Igarashi; Yungfeng Li; Joseph G Crompton; Danielle S Graham; Sarah M Dry; Nicholas Bernthal; Jane Yanagawa; Anusha Kalbasi; Noah Federman; Bartosz Chmielowski; Arun S Singh; Robert M Hoffman; Fritz C Eilber Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2017-08-04
Authors: Robert Brown; Edward Curry; Luca Magnani; Charlotte S Wilhelm-Benartzi; Jane Borley Journal: Nat Rev Cancer Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 60.716
Authors: Jason C Hall; Laura A Marlow; Adam C Mathias; Louis K Dawson; William F Durham; Kenneth A Meshaw; Robert J Mullin; Aidan J Synnott; Daniel L Small; Murli Krishna; Daniel von Hoff; Julia Schüler; Steven N Hart; Fergus J Couch; Gerardo Colon-Otero; John A Copland Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Jody E Hooper; Emma L Cantor; Macgregor S Ehlen; Avirup Banerjee; Suman Malempati; Peter Stenzel; Randy L Woltjer; Regina Gandour-Edwards; Neal C Goodwin; Yan Yang; Pali Kaur; Carol J Bult; Susan D Airhart; Charles Keller Journal: Sarcoma Date: 2015-11-30
Authors: Claire E Wakefield; Emma L Doolan; Joanna E Fardell; Christina Signorelli; Veronica F Quinn; Kathy F Tucker; Andrea F Patenaude; Glenn M Marshall; Richard B Lock; Gabrielle Georgiou; Richard J Cohn Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-08-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Robert J Allaway; Dawn A Fischer; Francine B de Abreu; Timothy B Gardner; Stuart R Gordon; Richard J Barth; Thomas A Colacchio; Matthew Wood; Balint Z Kacsoh; Stephanie J Bouley; Jingxuan Cui; Joanna Hamilton; Jungbin A Choi; Joshua T Lange; Jason D Peterson; Vijayalakshmi Padmanabhan; Craig R Tomlinson; Gregory J Tsongalis; Arief A Suriawinata; Casey S Greene; Yolanda Sanchez; Kerrington D Smith Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-03-29
Authors: Uri Ben-David; Gavin Ha; Yuen-Yi Tseng; Noah F Greenwald; Coyin Oh; Juliann Shih; James M McFarland; Bang Wong; Jesse S Boehm; Rameen Beroukhim; Todd R Golub Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2017-10-09 Impact factor: 38.330