| Literature DB >> 24687829 |
Martin R Stockler1, Felix Hilpert, Michael Friedlander, Madeleine T King, Lari Wenzel, Chee Khoon Lee, Florence Joly, Nikolaus de Gregorio, José Angel Arranz, Mansoor Raza Mirza, Roberto Sorio, Ulrich Freudensprung, Vesna Sneller, Gill Hales, Eric Pujade-Lauraine.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the effects of bevacizumab on patient-reported outcomes (PROs; secondary end point) in the AURELIA trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to chemotherapy alone (CT) or with bevacizumab (BEV-CT). PROs were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Ovarian Cancer Module 28 (EORTC QLQ-OV28) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian Cancer symptom index (FOSI) at baseline and every two or three cycles (8/9 weeks) until disease progression. The primary PRO hypothesis was that more patients receiving BEV-CT than CT would achieve at least a 15% (≥ 15-point) absolute improvement on the QLQ-OV28 abdominal/GI symptom subscale (items 31-36) at week 8/9. Patients with missing week 8/9 questionnaires were included as unimproved. Questionnaires from all assessments until disease progression were analyzed using mixed-model repeated-measures (MMRM) analysis. Sensitivity analyses were used to determine the effects of differing assumptions and methods for missing data.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24687829 PMCID: PMC4876313 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.4240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Oncol ISSN: 0732-183X Impact factor: 44.544