Literature DB >> 2468746

Patterns of relapse in large-cell lymphoma patients with bulk disease: implications for the use of adjuvant radiation therapy.

M A Shipp1, M M Klatt, B Yeap, M S Jochelson, P M Mauch, D S Rosenthal, A T Skarin, G P Canellos.   

Abstract

In patients with large-cell lymphoma (LCL) treated with combination chemotherapy, the presence of bulk disease has consistently been associated with a poorer response rate and a shortened survival. The optimal therapy for patients with bulk disease (greater than or equal to 10 cm) will depend on whether treatment failures result from inadequate tumor eradication in prior bulk sites or from distant dissemination. To address this issue, we have evaluated patterns of relapse in patients with bulk disease who relapsed after achieving a complete remission with methotrexate, bleomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone (M- or m-BACOD). Eighty-one II, III, or IV patients with disease greater than or equal to 10 cm were identified; 45 of the 81 patients achieved a confirmed complete response (CR) and are included in the analysis. The 45 complete responders included 21 patients with localized (stage II) disease and 24 patients with advanced (stage III/IV) disease. Six of the 21 stage II complete responders and three of the 24 stage II/IV complete responders also received adjuvant radiation therapy following completion of M- or m-BACOD. Only one of the 21 patients with stage II disease relapsed, doing so in the site of prior bulk involvement. In contrast, nine of 24 patients with stage III/IV disease relapsed, although no patient failed solely in the site of prior bulk disease. Stage III/IV patients recurred in either a new site (one patient), a new and old site (five), an old non-bulk site (two), or both old non-bulk and bulk sites (one). These results indicate that advanced-stage bulk-disease patients do not consistently relapse in sites of prior bulk disease; therefore, this group of patients is unlikely to benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy administered following completion of combination chemotherapy. Although the low relapse rate and the addition of adjuvant radiation therapy in a subgroup of the stage II bulk-disease patients precludes a definitive analysis, our results further suggest that these patients may be effectively treated with combination chemotherapy alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2468746     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.5.613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  5 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in adults--are we doing any better?

Authors:  H Hagberg; E Kimby
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Is Radiation Necessary for Treatment of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma of Bone? Clinical Results With Contemporary Therapy.

Authors:  Ishaq Ibrahim; Bryan D Haughom; Yale Fillingham; Steven Gitelis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Value of radiotherapy in disseminated high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma].

Authors:  U Kaiser; R Pfab; K Havemann
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  Does Radiation Have a Role in Advanced Stage Hodgkin's or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma?

Authors:  Lena Specht
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-01

Review 5.  Consolidation radiotherapy for advanced-stage aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ernie Yap; Zhe Kang Law; Nik Muhd Aslan Abdullah; S Fadilah Abdul Wahid
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.068

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.