Literature DB >> 24687152

Risk factors and learning curve associated with postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma.

Oh Jeong1, Seong Yeop Ryu, Won Yong Choi, Zhengri Piao, Young Kyu Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is a challenging surgical procedure that has substantial technical difficulties and complications. In this study, we investigated risk factors for morbidity and mortality after LTG, and the learning curve associated with postoperative morbidity.
METHODS: Prospectively constructed data of 203 patients undergoing LTG between 2004 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze risk factors for postoperative morbidity. The Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) technique was used to assess the learning curve.
RESULTS: Postoperative morbidity and mortality after LTG was 18.7 and 1.5 %, respectively. Of 38 patients with postoperative morbidity, 7 (3.4 %) were managed with reoperation, 8 (4.0 %) with radiologic or endoscopic intervention, and 23 (11.3 %) with a conservative treatment. Of local complications, gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common (12 patients), followed by anastomosis leakage (9 patients) and intra-abdominal abscess (9 patients). Respiratory complication was the most common of the systemic complications. There were 17 cases (8.4 %) of complications exceeding grade III severity, of which anastomosis leakage was the most common. CUSUM analysis showed that postoperative morbidity reached a plateau after around 45 cases. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that old age (over 65 years of age) and surgical experience (<45 cases) were independent factors for postoperative morbidity after LTG.
CONCLUSION: LTG is a feasible technique with acceptable morbidity and mortality. However, substantial surgical experience is of most importance to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24687152     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3666-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  29 in total

1.  Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic total gastrectomy in clinical stage I gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Daisuke Ichikawa; Shuhei Komatsu; Takeshi Kubota; Kazuma Okamoto; Hirotaka Konishi; Atsushi Shiozaki; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Evaluation of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results of a comparison with laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Jian-Xian Lin; Chang-Ming Huang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Lu Jun; Qi-Yue Chen; Mi Lin; Ruhong Tu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yoo Min Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-04

4.  Clinical and surgical factors associated with organ/space surgical site infection after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kosuga; Daisuke Ichikawa; Shuhei Komatsu; Takeshi Kubota; Kazuma Okamoto; Hirotaka Konishi; Atsushi Shiozaki; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effect of comorbidities on postoperative complications in patients with gastric cancer after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy: results from an 8-year experience at a large-scale single center.

Authors:  Jia-Bin Wang; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of surgical outcomes among different methods of esophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I proximal gastric cancer: results of a single-arm multicenter phase II clinical trial in Korea, KLASS 03.

Authors:  Han-Kwang Yang; Woo Jin Hyung; Sang-Uk Han; Young-Jun Lee; Joong-Min Park; Gyu Seok Cho; Oh Kyoung Kwon; Seong-Ho Kong; Hyoung-Il Kim; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Wook Kim; Seung Wan Ryu; Sung-Ho Jin; Sung Jin Oh; Keun Won Ryu; Min-Chan Kim; Hye Seong Ahn; Young Kyu Park; Yong Ho Kim; Sun-Hwi Hwang; Jong Won Kim; Jin-Jo Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy Performed by a Single Surgeon Experienced in Open Gastrectomy: Review of Initial Experience.

Authors:  Jeong Ho Song; Yoon Young Choi; Ji Yeong An; Dong Wook Kim; Woo Jin Hyung; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.720

8.  Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis.

Authors:  Mikito Inokuchi; Masatoshi Nakagawa; Toshiro Tanioka; Keisuke Okuno; Kentaro Gokita; Kazuyuki Kojima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction Improves Postoperative Outcomes: a Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Andreou; Sebastian Knitter; Sascha Chopra; Christian Denecke; Moritz Schmelzle; Benjamin Struecker; Ann-Christin Heilmann; Johanna Spenke; Tobias Hofmann; Peter C Thuss-Patience; Marcus Bahra; Johann Pratschke; Matthias Biebl
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Morbidity and Mortality After Gastrectomy: Identification of Modifiable Risk Factors.

Authors:  Allison N Martin; Deepanjana Das; Florence E Turrentine; Todd W Bauer; Reid B Adams; Victor M Zaydfudim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.