Literature DB >> 24686502

A demonstration of improved precision of word recognition scores.

Robert S Schlauch, Elizabeth S Anderson, Christophe Micheyl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to demonstrate improved precision of word recognition scores (WRSs) by increasing list length and analyzing phonemic errors. METHOD Pure-tone thresholds (frequencies between 0.25 and 8.0 kHz) and WRSs were measured in 3 levels of speech-shaped noise (50, 52, and 54 dB HL) for 24 listeners with normal hearing. WRSs were obtained for half-lists and full lists of Northwestern University Test No. 6 (Tillman & Carhart, 1966) words presented at 48 dB HL. A resampling procedure was used to derive dimensionless effect sizes for identifying a change in hearing using the data. This allowed the direct comparison of the magnitude of shifts in WRS (%) and in the average pure-tone threshold (dB), which provided a context for interpreting the WRS. RESULTS WRSs based on a 50-word list analyzed by the percentage of correct phonemes were significantly more sensitive for identifying a change in hearing than the WRSs based on 25-word lists analyzed by percentage of correct words. CONCLUSION Increasing the number of items that contribute to a WRS significantly increased the test's ability to identify a change in hearing. Clinical and research applications could potentially benefit from a more precise word recognition test, the only basic audiologic measure that estimates directly the distortion component of hearing loss and its effect on communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24686502     DOI: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  2 in total

1.  Variability of word discrimination scores in clinical practice and consequences on their sensitivity to hearing loss.

Authors:  Annie Moulin; André Bernard; Laurent Tordella; Judith Vergne; Annie Gisbert; Christian Martin; Céline Richard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  The Thomas More Lists: A Phonemically Balanced Dutch Monosyllabic Speech Audiometry Test.

Authors:  Filiep Vanpoucke; Marleen De Sloovere; Anke Plasmans
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-07-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.