Jan N Hilberath1, Peter S Burrage2, Stanton K Shernan2, Dirk J Varelmann2, Kerry Wilusz2, John A Fox2, Holger K Eltzschig3, Laurence M Epstein4, Martina Nowak-Machen5. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA jhilberath@partners.org. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. 4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA. 5. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Abstract
AIMS: The rising number of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices has led to a steep increase in transvenous lead extractions (TLEs). Procedure-related, haemodynamically significant adverse events are uncommon during TLE yet remain an inevitable risk. While the use of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as a guide to clinical decision-making during refractory circulatory instability has been well established, the specific utility of rescue TEE during TLE has not been comprehensively studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six patients who required emergent TEE to determine the aetiology of intractable haemodynamic instability during TLE were evaluated. Pericardial effusion requiring urgent pericardiocentesis and/or cardiac surgical intervention was diagnosed by TEE in 10 patients, and progressed to cardiac arrest in 4 patients. Haemorrhagic shock developed in two patients suffering from femoral vein laceration and right haemothorax, respectively. One additional patient developed acute respiratory compromise and right ventricular dysfunction diagnosed by TEE, which necessitated prolonged post-operative intubation and inotropic therapy. In 14 patients, TEE excluded life-threatening cardiovascular injuries and enabled the pursuit of continued medical management. Two patients with reassuring TEE findings underwent intra-operative placement of chest tubes for pneumothorax. All the 26 patients were discharged from the hospital. CONCLUSION: While TLE is a relatively safe procedure, life-threatening cardiovascular injuries remain a rare risk. In this study, the use of rescue TEE ruled out significant cardiovascular injuries in the majority of patients. Furthermore, rescue TEE had a substantial impact on the efficiency of determining the aetiology of refractory haemodynamic instability during TLE and thereby facilitated the timely initiation of definitive intervention. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
AIMS: The rising number of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices has led to a steep increase in transvenous lead extractions (TLEs). Procedure-related, haemodynamically significant adverse events are uncommon during TLE yet remain an inevitable risk. While the use of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as a guide to clinical decision-making during refractory circulatory instability has been well established, the specific utility of rescue TEE during TLE has not been comprehensively studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six patients who required emergent TEE to determine the aetiology of intractable haemodynamic instability during TLE were evaluated. Pericardial effusion requiring urgent pericardiocentesis and/or cardiac surgical intervention was diagnosed by TEE in 10 patients, and progressed to cardiac arrest in 4 patients. Haemorrhagic shock developed in two patients suffering from femoral vein laceration and right haemothorax, respectively. One additional patient developed acute respiratory compromise and right ventricular dysfunction diagnosed by TEE, which necessitated prolonged post-operative intubation and inotropic therapy. In 14 patients, TEE excluded life-threatening cardiovascular injuries and enabled the pursuit of continued medical management. Two patients with reassuring TEE findings underwent intra-operative placement of chest tubes for pneumothorax. All the 26 patients were discharged from the hospital. CONCLUSION: While TLE is a relatively safe procedure, life-threatening cardiovascular injuries remain a rare risk. In this study, the use of rescue TEE ruled out significant cardiovascular injuries in the majority of patients. Furthermore, rescue TEE had a substantial impact on the efficiency of determining the aetiology of refractory haemodynamic instability during TLE and thereby facilitated the timely initiation of definitive intervention. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Andrzej Kleinrok; Łukasz Tułecki; Andrzej Kutarski Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2021-04
Authors: Mihai Strachinaru; Chris M Kievit; Sing C Yap; Alexander Hirsch; Marcel L Geleijnse; Tamas Szili-Torok Journal: Echocardiography Date: 2019-03-24 Impact factor: 1.724
Authors: Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Paweł Stefańczyk; Andrzej Kutarski Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-10-01 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Dorota Nowosielecka; Wojciech Jacheć; Anna Polewczyk; Łukasz Tułecki; Konrad Tomków; Paweł Stefańczyk; Andrzej Tomaszewski; Wojciech Brzozowski; Dorota Szcześniak-Stańczyk; Andrzej Kleinrok; Andrzej Kutarski Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 4.241