Literature DB >> 24686001

Mid-term results of aortic valve surgery in redo scenarios in the current practice: results from the multicentre European RECORD (REdo Cardiac Operation Research Database) initiative†.

Francesco Onorati1, Fausto Biancari2, Marisa De Feo3, Giovanni Mariscalco4, Antonio Messina5, Giuseppe Santarpino6, Francesco Santini7, Cesare Beghi4, Giannantonio Nappi3, Giovanni Troise5, Theodor Fischlein6, Giancarlo Passerone7, Juni Heikkinen2, Giuseppe Faggian8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although commonly reported as single-centre experiences, redo aortic valve replacement (RAVR) has overall acceptable results. Nevertheless, trans-catheter aortic valve replacement has recently questioned the efficacy of RAVR.
METHODS: Early-to-mid-term results and determinants of mortality in 711 cases of RAVR from seven European institutions were assessed in the entire population and in selected high-risk subgroups [elderly >75 years, urgent/emergent procedures, preoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional Class IV and endocarditis].
RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 5.1%, major re-entry cardiovascular complications (MRCVCs) 4.9%, low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) 15.3%, stroke 6.6%, acute respiratory failure (ARF) 10.6%, acute renal insufficiency (ARI) 19.3% and need for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) 7.2%, transfusions 66.9% and for permanent pacemaker (PMK) 12.7%. Mid-term survival, freedom from acute heart failure (AHF), reinterventions, stroke and thrombo-embolisms were 77.2 ± 2.7, 84.4 ± 2.6, 97.2 ± 0.8, 97.2 ± 0.9 and 96.3 ± 1.2%, respectively; 87.5% of patients were in NYHA functional Class I-II. Preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction of <30% [odds ratio (OR) 8.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-35.6], MRCVCs (OR 20.9, 95% CI 5.6-78.3), cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.0-1.1), perioperative LCOS (OR 17.2, 95% CI 5.1-57.4) and ARI (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.5-18.1) predicted hospital death. Endocarditis (OR 7.5, 95% CI 2.9-19.1), preoperative NYHA functional Class IV (OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.0-24.0), combined RAVR + mitral surgery (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.5-17.3) and AHF at follow-up (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-6.0) predicted late death at the Cox proportional hazard regression model. Elderly >75 years had similar hospital mortality (P = 0.06) and major morbidity, except for a higher need for PMK (P = 0.03), as well as comparable mid-term survival (P = 0.89), freedom from AHF (P = 0.81), reinterventions (P = 0.63), stroke (P = 0.21) and thrombo-embolisms (P = 0.09). Urgent/emergent indication resulted in higher hospital death, LCOS, transfusions, MRCVCs, intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP), stroke, prolonged (>48 h) ventilation, pneumonia, ARI, CRRT, lower mid-term survival and freedom from AHF (P ≤ 0.03). Preoperative NYHA functional Class IV correlated with higher LCOS, IABP, prolonged ventilation, pneumonia, ARF, ARI, CRRT and MRCVCs and lower mid-term survival, freedom from AHF, reinterventions and stroke (P ≤ 0.02). Endocarditis demonstrated higher hospital mortality, MRCVCs, LCOS, IABP, stroke, ARF, prolonged intubation, pneumonia, ARI, CRRT, transfusions and PMK and lower mid-term survival and freedom from AHF and reinterventions (P ≤ 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: RAVR achieves overall satisfactory results. Baseline risk factors and perioperative complications strongly affect outcomes and mandate improvements in perioperative management. New emerging strategies might be considered in selected high-risk cases.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement; Emergent cardiac surgery; Endocarditis; Prosthetic endocarditis; Redo

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24686001     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  13 in total

1.  Minimally invasive reoperative aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Elisa Mikus; Simone Calvi; Alberto Tripodi; Luca Dozza; Mauro Lamarra; Mauro Del Giglio
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-01

2.  Parsimonious assessment for reoperative aortic valve replacement; the deterrent effect of low left ventricular ejection fraction and renal impairment.

Authors:  Maroun Yammine; Fernando Ramirez-Del Val; Julius I Ejiofor; Robert C Neely; Diana Shi; Siobhan McGurk; Sary F Aranki; Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Prem S Shekar
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

3.  Redo aortic valve surgery versus transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failing surgical bioprosthetic valves: consecutive patients in a single-center setting.

Authors:  Magdalena Erlebach; Michael Wottke; Marcus-André Deutsch; Markus Krane; Nicolo Piazza; Ruediger Lange; Sabine Bleiziffer
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Postoperative acute kidney injury defined by RIFLE criteria predicts early health outcome and long-term survival in patients undergoing redo coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Mustafa Zakkar; Vito D Bruno; Gustavo Guida; Gianni D Angelini; Pierpaulo Chivasso; M Sadeeh Suleiman; Alan J Bryan; Raimondo Ascione
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement after Previous Mechanical Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Markus Schlömicher; Peter Lukas Haldenwang; Vadim Moustafine; Britta Wolf; Peter Zahn; Matthias Bechtel; Justus Thomas Strauch
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep       Date:  2016-04-04

6.  Early health outcome and 10-year survival in patients undergoing redo coronary surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Vito D Bruno; Mustafa Zakkar; Filippo Rapetto; Asif Rathore; Roberto Marsico; Pierpaolo Chivasso; Raimondo Ascione
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Previous Cardiac Surgery: a Predictor of Mortality in Aortic Valve Replacement?

Authors:  Victor Dayan; Maria José Arocena; Amparo Fernandez; Eloísa Silva; Diego Pérez Zerpa
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

8.  Valve-in-Valve for Degenerated Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A 3-Center Comparison of Hemodynamic and 1-Year Outcome.

Authors:  Matthias C Raschpichler; Felix Woitek; Tarun Chakravarty; Nir Flint; Sung-Han Yoon; Norman Mangner; Chinar G Patel; Chetana Singh; Mohammad Kashif; Philip Kiefer; David Holzhey; Axel Linke; Georg Stachel; Holger Thiele; Michael A Borger; Raj R Makkar
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Outcomes comparison of different surgical strategies for the management of severe aortic valve stenosis: study protocol of a prospective multicentre European registry (E-AVR registry).

Authors:  Francesco Onorati; Riccardo Gherli; Giovanni Mariscalco; Evaldas Girdauskas; Eduardo Quintana; Francesco Santini; Marisa De Feo; Sandro Sponga; Piergiorgio Tozzi; Mohamad Bashir; Andrea Perrotti; Aniello Pappalardo; Vito Giovanni Ruggieri; Giuseppe Santarpino; Mauro Rinaldi; Silva Ronaldo; Francesco Nicolini
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Surgical Complexity and Outcome of Patients Undergoing Re-do Aortic Valve Surgery.

Authors:  Renata Greco; Mirko Muretti; Jasmina Djordjevic; Xu Yu Jin; Elaine Hill; Maurizio Renna; Mario Petrou
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.