OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expression levels and the clinical significance of MYC and MXI1 proteins in breast cancer. METHODS: The expression levels of MYC and MXI1 were detected by immunohistochemical assay in 166 cases of breast cancer; the relationships among MYC, MXI1 and the clinicopathological parameters were analyzed by χ2 test. Univariate analysis and Cox's proportional hazards model were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of the 2 proteins. RESULTS: 27.71% of the tumor specimens showed high staining intensity for MYC (high-expression group, HEG-MYC) and 22.89% showed high staining intensity for MXI1 (HEG-MXI1); the expression of 2 proteins was negatively correlated (r = -0.177 p = 0.022). The Kaplan-Meier method for survival analysis showed that patients of the MYC-HEG demonstrated a significantly worse disease-specific survival than those of the MYC-low-expression group (LEG) (χ2 = 11.102, p = 0.001). However, patients of the MXI1-HEG had a significantly better disease-specific survival than those of the MXI1-LEG (χ2 = 7.858, p = 0.005). Both univariate analysis and Cox's proportional hazards model indicated that MYC and MXI1 could be independent prognostic molecular markers. CONCLUSION: MYC-HEG and MXI1-LEG levels are associated with poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer, suggesting that they may be useful molecular markers in breast cancer prognosis prediction.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expression levels and the clinical significance of MYC and MXI1 proteins in breast cancer. METHODS: The expression levels of MYC and MXI1 were detected by immunohistochemical assay in 166 cases of breast cancer; the relationships among MYC, MXI1 and the clinicopathological parameters were analyzed by χ2 test. Univariate analysis and Cox's proportional hazards model were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of the 2 proteins. RESULTS: 27.71% of the tumor specimens showed high staining intensity for MYC (high-expression group, HEG-MYC) and 22.89% showed high staining intensity for MXI1 (HEG-MXI1); the expression of 2 proteins was negatively correlated (r = -0.177 p = 0.022). The Kaplan-Meier method for survival analysis showed that patients of the MYC-HEG demonstrated a significantly worse disease-specific survival than those of the MYC-low-expression group (LEG) (χ2 = 11.102, p = 0.001). However, patients of the MXI1-HEG had a significantly better disease-specific survival than those of the MXI1-LEG (χ2 = 7.858, p = 0.005). Both univariate analysis and Cox's proportional hazards model indicated that MYC and MXI1 could be independent prognostic molecular markers. CONCLUSION:MYC-HEG and MXI1-LEG levels are associated with poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer, suggesting that they may be useful molecular markers in breast cancer prognosis prediction.