Literature DB >> 24685105

Moral discourses and pharmaceuticalised governance in households.

Kevin Dew1, Pauline Norris2, Jonathan Gabe3, Kerry Chamberlain4, Darrin Hodgetts5.   

Abstract

This article extends our understanding of the everyday practices of pharmaceuticalisation through an examination of moral concerns over medication practices in the household. Moral concerns of responsibility and discipline in relation to pharmaceutical consumption have been identified, such as passive or active medication practices, and adherence to orthodox or unorthodox accounts. This paper further delineates dimensions of the moral evaluations of pharmaceuticals. In 2010 and 2011 data were collected from 55 households across New Zealand and data collection techniques, such as photo- and diary-elicitation interviews, allowed the participants to develop and articulate reflective stories of the moral meaning of pharmaceuticals. Four repertoires were identified: a disordering society repertoire where pharmaceuticals evoke a society in an unnatural state; a disordering self repertoire where pharmaceuticals signify a moral failing of the individual; a disordering substances repertoire where pharmaceuticals signify a threat to one's physical or mental equilibrium; a re-ordering substances repertoire where pharmaceuticals signify the restoration of function. The research demonstrated that the dichotomies of orthodox/unorthodox and compliance/resistance do not adequately capture how medications are used and understood in everyday practice. Attitudes change according to why pharmaceuticals are taken and who is taking them, their impacts on social relationships, and different views on the social or natural production of disease, the power of the pharmaceutical industry, and the role of health experts. Pharmaceuticals are tied to our identity, what we want to show of ourselves, and what sort of world we see ourselves living in. The ordering and disordering understandings of pharmaceuticals intersect with forms of pharmaceuticalised governance, where conduct is governed through pharmaceutical routines, and where self-responsibility entails following the prescription of other agents. Pharmaceuticals symbolise forms of governance with different sets of roles and responsibilities.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Governmentality; Moral discourses; New Zealand; Pharmaceuticalisation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24685105     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  4 in total

1.  'The problem here is that they want to solve everything with pills': medication use and identity among Mainland Puerto Ricans.

Authors:  Wallis E Adams; Irina L G Todorova; Mariana T Guzzardo; Luis M Falcón
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2015-02-27

2.  The Disparate Approaches of General Practitioners to the Pharmaceuticalisation of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.

Authors:  Tom Douglass; Michael Calnan
Journal:  Front Sociol       Date:  2021-05-21

3.  Prescriptions and proscriptions: moralising sleep medicines.

Authors:  Jonathan Gabe; Catherine M Coveney; Simon J Williams
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2015-11-20

4.  Adherence and the Moral Construction of the Self: A Narrative Analysis of Anticoagulant Medication.

Authors:  Meredith K D Hawking; John Robson; Stephanie J C Taylor; Deborah Swinglehurst
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2020-08-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.