Literature DB >> 24685006

Effects of amlodipine and other classes of antihypertensive drugs on long-term blood pressure variability: evidence from randomized controlled trials.

Ji-Guang Wang1, Ping Yan2, Barrett W Jeffers3.   

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) is monitored and managed to prevent cardiovascular complications of hypertension, but BP variability (BPV) has not been sufficiently studied. This analysis assessed whether patients receiving amlodipine vs other antihypertensive agents had lower BPV after ≥12 weeks of treatment. Studies were included if individual subject data were available, had ≥1 active comparator, and treatment duration was ≥12 weeks. BPV was assessed using standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of systolic BP across visits from 12 weeks. Individual trial and meta-analyses were performed for SD- and CV-based methodology. Five studies (47,558 BPV-evaluable patients) were included. Patient characteristics were largely consistent across the studies, but BP measurements varied from ∼4 months to ∼6 years. BPV with amlodipine was significantly (P < .0001) lower vs atenolol and lisinopril; significantly (P < .0001) lower than enalapril in one study and numerically, but not significantly lower in another; and similar to chlorthalidone and losartan. Meta-analysis revealed a treatment difference (standard error) for amlodipine vs all active comparators of -1.23 (0.46; P = .008) mm Hg using SD and -0.86 (0.31; P = .005) using CV. These findings suggest that amlodipine is effective for minimizing BPV. Future studies need to confirm a causal link between BPV and cerebrovascular/cardiovascular outcomes.
Copyright © 2014 American Society of Hypertension. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure variability; calcium channel blockers; hypertension; meta-analysis; trial

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24685006     DOI: 10.1016/j.jash.2014.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens        ISSN: 1878-7436


  10 in total

Review 1.  Blood pressure variability: assessment, predictive value, and potential as a therapeutic target.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Carolina Lombardi; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Visit-to-Visit Variability of Systolic Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Wael F Hussein; Tara I Chang
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Cell-Based High-Throughput Screening for Aromatase Inhibitors in the Tox21 10K Library.

Authors:  Shiuan Chen; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Ruili Huang; Srilatha Sakamuru; Li-Yu Hsin; Menghang Xia; Keith R Shockley; Scott Auerbach; Noriko Kanaya; Hannah Lu; Daniel Svoboda; Kristine L Witt; B Alex Merrick; Christina T Teng; Raymond R Tice
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Long-Term Blood Pressure Variability and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events Among Community-Dwelling Elderly.

Authors:  Michael E Ernst; Enayet K Chowdhury; Lawrence J Beilin; Karen L Margolis; Mark R Nelson; Rory Wolfe; Andrew M Tonkin; Joanne Ryan; Robyn L Woods; John J McNeil; Christopher M Reid
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Variability May Be the "Law of Life," but Blood Pressure Variability May Forebode a Shorter Life.

Authors:  Magdalene M Assimon; Jennifer E Flythe
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Association of Blood Pressure Variability and Diuretics With Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 1-5.

Authors:  L Parker Gregg; S Susan Hedayati; Hui Yang; Peter N Van Buren; Subhash Banerjee; Sankar D Navaneethan; Salim S Virani; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Carlos A Alvarez
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  Medication adherence and visit-to-visit variability of systolic blood pressure in African Americans with chronic kidney disease in the AASK trial.

Authors:  K Hong; P Muntner; I Kronish; D Shilane; T I Chang
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.012

8.  Is amlodipine more cardioprotective than other antihypertensive drug classes?

Authors:  Chang Gyu Park
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  Effects of valsartan and amlodipine on oxidative stress in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension: a randomized, multicenter study.

Authors:  Hae Jin Kim; Seung Jin Han; Dae Jung Kim; Hak Chul Jang; Soo Lim; Sung Hee Choi; Yong Hyun Kim; Dong Hyun Shin; Se Hwa Kim; Tae Ho Kim; Yu Bae Ahn; Seung Hyun Ko; Nan Hee Kim; Ji A Seo; Ha Young Kim; Kwan Woo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 10.  Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques.

Authors:  Aletta E Schutte; Anastasios Kollias; George S Stergiou
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 49.421

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.