Literature DB >> 24684875

Diagnosis and management of benign, atypical, and indeterminate breast lesions detected on core needle biopsy.

Lonzetta Neal1, Nicole P Sandhu2, Tina J Hieken3, Katrina N Glazebrook4, Maire Brid Mac Bride2, Christina A Dilaveri2, Dietlind L Wahner-Roedler2, Karthik Ghosh2, Daniel W Visscher5.   

Abstract

Imaging abnormalities detected by mammographic screening often lead to diagnostic evaluations, with suspicious abnormalities subjected to image-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) to exclude malignancy. Most CNBs reveal benign pathological alterations, termed benign breast disease (BBD). Adoption of CNB presents challenges with pathologic classification of breast abnormalities and management of patients with benign or atypical histological findings. Patient management and counseling after CNB diagnosis of BBD depends on postbiopsy determination of radiologic-pathologic concordancy. Communication between radiologists and pathologists is crucial in patient management. Management is dependent on the histological type of BBD. Patients with concordant pathologic imaging results can be reassured of benign biopsy findings and advised about the future risk of developing breast cancer. Surgical consultation is advised for patients with discordant findings, symptomatic patients, and high-risk lesions. This review highlights benign breast lesions that are encountered on CNB and summarizes management strategies. For this review, we conducted a search of PubMed, with no date limitations, and used the following search terms (or a combination of terms): atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, benign breast disease, cellular fibroepithelial lesions, columnar cell lesions, complex sclerosing lesion, core needle biopsy, fibroadenomas, flat epithelial atypia, lobular carcinoma in situ, lobular neoplasia, mucocele-like lesions, phyllodes tumor, pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia, radial scar, and vascular lesions. The selection of references included in this review was based on study relevance and quality. We used additional articles culled from the bibliographies of retrieved articles to examine the published evidence for risk factors of BBD.
Copyright © 2014 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24684875     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  16 in total

1.  Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Breast Cancer Biomarkers: CALGB 70806 (Alliance) Study Design and Baseline Data.

Authors:  Ogheneruona Apoe; Sin-Ho Jung; Heshan Liu; Drew K Seisler; Jayne Charlamb; Patricia Zekan; Lili X Wang; Gary W Unzeitig; Judy Garber; James Marshall; Marie Wood
Journal:  Am J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-07

2.  Surgical implications and variability in the use of the flat epithelial atypia diagnosis on breast biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Laura S Samples; Mara H Rendi; Paul D Frederick; Kimberly H Allison; Heidi D Nelson; Thomas R Morgan; Donald L Weaver; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Flat epithelial atypia and risk of breast cancer: A Mayo cohort study.

Authors:  Samar M Said; Daniel W Visscher; Aziza Nassar; Ryan D Frank; Robert A Vierkant; Marlene H Frost; Karthik Ghosh; Derek C Radisky; Lynn C Hartmann; Amy C Degnim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Capsule commentary on Schonberg et al., Older women's experience with a benign breast biopsy—a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Sara L Jackson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Management of high-risk breast lesions diagnosed on core biopsies and experiences from prospective high-risk breast lesion conferences at an academic institution.

Authors:  Xiaoxian Li; Zhongliang Ma; Toncred M Styblo; Cletus A Arciero; Haibo Wang; Michael A Cohen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  How Do We Approach Benign Proliferative Lesions?

Authors:  Faina Nakhlis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.075

7.  Performance of a clinical and imaging-based multivariate model as decision support tool to help save unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions.

Authors:  Dogan S Polat; Jennifer G Schopp; Firouzeh Arjmandi; Jessica Porembka; Venetia Sarode; Deborah Farr; Yin Xi; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  The emerging role of photoacoustic imaging in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Li Lin; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 9.  Breast Cancer: Conventional Diagnosis and Treatment Modalities and Recent Patents and Technologies.

Authors:  Mohamed I Nounou; Fatema ElAmrawy; Nada Ahmed; Kamilia Abdelraouf; Satyanarayana Goda; Hussaini Syed-Sha-Qhattal
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2015-09-27

10.  Suspicious amorphous microcalcifications detected on full-field digital mammography: correlation with histopathology.

Authors:  Vera Christina Camargo de Siqueira Ferreira; Elba Cristina Sá de Camargo Etchebehere; José Luiz Barbosa Bevilacqua; Nestor de Barros
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.