Literature DB >> 24684458

H-RAS mutations are restricted to sporadic pheochromocytomas lacking specific clinical or pathological features: data from a multi-institutional series.

Lindsey Oudijk1, Ronald R de Krijger, Ida Rapa, Felix Beuschlein, Aguirre A de Cubas, Angelo P Dei Tos, Winand N M Dinjens, Esther Korpershoek, Veronika Mancikova, Massimo Mannelli, Mauro Papotti, Simona Vatrano, Mercedes Robledo, Marco Volante.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Somatic or germline mutations in up to 15 disease-causative genes are detectable in up to 50% of patients with pheochromocytoma (PCC) and paraganglioma (PGL). Very recently, somatic H-RAS mutations were identified by exome sequencing in approximately 7% in sporadic PCCs and PGLs, in association with male sex and benign behavior.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the prevalence of RAS mutations in a cohort of 271 PCC and PGL from a European registry and to compare the genotype with clinical and pathological characteristics of potential clinical interest. SETTING AND
DESIGN: Genetic screening for hotspot mutations in H-, N-, and K-RAS genes was performed by means of Sanger sequencing or pyrosequencing methods on tumor DNA in a series of patients with (n = 107) or without (n = 164) germline or somatic PCC/PGL-related gene mutations.
RESULTS: Overall, H-RAS mutations were detected in 5.2% of cases (14/271), which were confined to sporadic PCCs resulting in a prevalence of 10% (14/140) in this cohort. In contrast, no mutations were found in PCC with PCC/PGL-related gene mutations (0/76) or in PGL (0/55) harboring or not mutations in PCC/PGL susceptibility genes. In this large series, H-RAS mutations in PCCs lacked any significant correlation with pathological or basic clinical endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS: Somatic H-RAS mutations are restricted to a relevant proportion of sporadic PCC. These findings provide the basis to study potential H-RAS-dependent correlations with long-term outcome data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24684458     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-3879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  17 in total

Review 1.  Rodent models of pheochromocytoma, parallels in rodent and human tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Charlotte Lussey-Lepoutre; Alexandre Buffet; Aurélie Morin; Judith Goncalves; Judith Favier
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 2.  Precision medicine in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: current and future concepts.

Authors:  P Björklund; K Pacak; J Crona
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  What Have We Learned from Molecular Biology of Paragangliomas and Pheochromocytomas?

Authors:  Thomas G Papathomas; Diederik P D Suurd; Alfred K Lam; Ronald R de Krijger; Karel Pacak; Arthur S Tischler; Menno R Vriens
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 4.  Paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma: from genetics to personalized medicine.

Authors:  Judith Favier; Laurence Amar; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 5.  Rethinking pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas from a genomic perspective.

Authors:  L J Castro-Vega; C Lepoutre-Lussey; A-P Gimenez-Roqueplo; J Favier
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  PheoSeq: A Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Assay for Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Diagnostics.

Authors:  Maria Currás-Freixes; Elena Piñeiro-Yañez; Cristina Montero-Conde; María Apellániz-Ruiz; Bruna Calsina; Veronika Mancikova; Laura Remacha; Susan Richter; Tonino Ercolino; Natalie Rogowski-Lehmann; Timo Deutschbein; María Calatayud; Sonsoles Guadalix; Cristina Álvarez-Escolá; Cristina Lamas; Javier Aller; Julia Sastre-Marcos; Conxi Lázaro; Juan C Galofré; Ana Patiño-García; Amparo Meoro-Avilés; Judith Balmaña-Gelpi; Paz De Miguel-Novoa; Milagros Balbín; Xavier Matías-Guiu; Rocío Letón; Lucía Inglada-Pérez; Rafael Torres-Pérez; Juan M Roldán-Romero; Cristina Rodríguez-Antona; Stephanie M J Fliedner; Giuseppe Opocher; Karel Pacak; Esther Korpershoek; Ronald R de Krijger; Laurent Vroonen; Massimo Mannelli; Martin Fassnacht; Felix Beuschlein; Graeme Eisenhofer; Alberto Cascón; Fátima Al-Shahrour; Mercedes Robledo
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 5.568

7.  A systematic review on the genetic analysis of paragangliomas: primarily focused on head and neck paragangliomas.

Authors:  A Guha; Z Musil; A Vicha; T Zelinka; K Pacak; J Astl; M Chovanec
Journal:  Neoplasma       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.575

Review 8.  Management of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas: A Case-Based Review of Clinical Aspects and Perspectives.

Authors:  Bartosz Kamil Sobocki; Adrian Perdyan; Olga Szot; Jacek Rutkowski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 9.  Challenges in Paragangliomas and Pheochromocytomas: from Histology to Molecular Immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  C Christofer Juhlin
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.943

10.  Multi-omics analysis defines core genomic alterations in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

Authors:  Luis Jaime Castro-Vega; Eric Letouzé; Nelly Burnichon; Alexandre Buffet; Pierre-Hélie Disderot; Emmanuel Khalifa; Céline Loriot; Nabila Elarouci; Aurélie Morin; Mélanie Menara; Charlotte Lepoutre-Lussey; Cécile Badoual; Mathilde Sibony; Bertrand Dousset; Rossella Libé; Franck Zinzindohoue; Pierre François Plouin; Jérôme Bertherat; Laurence Amar; Aurélien de Reyniès; Judith Favier; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 17.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.