BACKGROUND: Biobadaderm is the Spanish registry of psoriasis patients receiving systemic treatment in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety of biologics and classic systemic treatment. METHODS: Prospective cohort of patients receiving biologics and classic systemic therapies between 2008 and 2013 in 12 hospitals are included. We registered demographic data, diagnoses, comorbidities, treatments and adverse events (AE). We obtained raw relative risks (RR) for specific AE. Multivariate analysis consisted of Cox models adjusting for age, gender, chronic hepatic disease and previous cancer. RESULTS: A total of 1030 patients received biologics (2061 AE in 3681 person-years), 926 patients classic systemic drugs (1015 AE in 1517 person-years). Ninety-three per cent of AE in both groups were non-serious, 6% serious and 0.003% fatal. The age- and gender-adjusted hazard ratio of AE was lower in the biologics group [hazard ratio 0.6 (95% CI: 0.5-0.7)].We found no differences in rates of serious and mortal AE. Some system organ class AE rates differed between both groups. As limitations: Prescription bias might affect the incidence of AE in both groups. Association of drug and AE was based on timing: associations might not be causal. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving biologics had lower risk of AE. We did not find differences in the risk of serious or fatal AE.
BACKGROUND: Biobadaderm is the Spanish registry of psoriasispatients receiving systemic treatment in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety of biologics and classic systemic treatment. METHODS: Prospective cohort of patients receiving biologics and classic systemic therapies between 2008 and 2013 in 12 hospitals are included. We registered demographic data, diagnoses, comorbidities, treatments and adverse events (AE). We obtained raw relative risks (RR) for specific AE. Multivariate analysis consisted of Cox models adjusting for age, gender, chronic hepatic disease and previous cancer. RESULTS: A total of 1030 patients received biologics (2061 AE in 3681 person-years), 926 patients classic systemic drugs (1015 AE in 1517 person-years). Ninety-three per cent of AE in both groups were non-serious, 6% serious and 0.003% fatal. The age- and gender-adjusted hazard ratio of AE was lower in the biologics group [hazard ratio 0.6 (95% CI: 0.5-0.7)].We found no differences in rates of serious and mortal AE. Some system organ class AE rates differed between both groups. As limitations: Prescription bias might affect the incidence of AE in both groups. Association of drug and AE was based on timing: associations might not be causal. CONCLUSION:Patients receiving biologics had lower risk of AE. We did not find differences in the risk of serious or fatal AE.
Authors: Edward Shelton; David Laharie; Frank I Scott; Ronac Mamtani; James D Lewis; Jean-Frederic Colombel; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: K Reich; U Mrowietz; M A Radtke; D Thaci; S J Rustenbach; C Spehr; M Augustin Journal: Arch Dermatol Res Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: J Beecker; K A Papp; J Dutz; R B Vender; R Gniadecki; C Cooper; P Gisondi; M Gooderham; C H Hong; M G Kirchhof; C W Lynde; C Maari; Y Poulin; L Puig Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Marzieh Zargaran; Fatemeh Soleymani; Saman Ahmad Nasrollahi; Meysam Seyedifar; Mohammad Mehdi Ashrafian Rahaghi Journal: Res Pharm Sci Date: 2021-06-30
Authors: Luigi Francesco Iannone; Luigi Bennardo; Caterina Palleria; Roberta Roberti; Caterina De Sarro; Maria Diana Naturale; Stefano Dastoli; Luca Donato; Antonia Manti; Giancarlo Valenti; Domenico D'Amico; Santo D'Attola; Adele Emanuela De Francesco; Vincenzo Bosco; Eugenio Donato Di Paola; Steven Paul Nisticò; Rita Citraro; Emilio Russo; Giovambattista De Sarro Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-03 Impact factor: 3.240