Cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) is involved in the metabolism of xenobiotic compounds and endogenous metabolites. Disruption of Cyp1b1 in mice results in suppression of high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity and an extensive change in hepatic energy regulation despite minimal constitutive expression of CYP1B1 in hepatocytes. Lack of CYP1B1 is correlated with altered lipid metabolism, especially lysophosphatidylcholines, contributing to protection against obesity. Ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-QTOFMS)-based metabolomics revealed lysophosphatidylcholine 18:0 (LPC 18:0) as a biomarker positively related to HFD-induced obesity. The increased serum LPC 18:0 in wild-type mice is reduced in Cyp1b1-null mice on a HFD, which is reversed in CYP1B1-humanized mice. CYP1B1-humanized mice show higher diet-induced obesity compared with Cyp1b1-null mice, suggesting that human CYP1B1 shows a similar response to HFD as mouse Cyp1b1. In addition, hepatic stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) expression was decreased in Cyp1b1-null mice, and the attenuated diet-induced obesity and lower serum LPC 18:0 in the Cyp1b1-null mice is elevated after SCD1 overexpression, suggesting that SCD1 is correlated with CYP1B1-induced obesity. These studies establish a biochemical link between cytochromes P450, lipids, and metabolic disorders and suggest that inhibition of CYP1B1 could be target for antiobesity drugs.
Cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) is involved in the metabolism of xenobiotic compounds and endogenous metabolites. Disruption of Cyp1b1 in mice results in suppression of high-fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity and an extensive change in hepatic energy regulation despite minimal constitutive expression of CYP1B1 in hepatocytes. Lack of CYP1B1 is correlated with altered lipid metabolism, especially lysophosphatidylcholines, contributing to protection against obesity. Ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-QTOFMS)-based metabolomics revealed lysophosphatidylcholine 18:0 (LPC 18:0) as a biomarker positively related to HFD-induced obesity. The increased serum LPC 18:0 in wild-type mice is reduced in Cyp1b1-null mice on a HFD, which is reversed in CYP1B1-humanized mice. CYP1B1-humanized mice show higher diet-induced obesity compared with Cyp1b1-null mice, suggesting that humanCYP1B1 shows a similar response to HFD as mouseCyp1b1. In addition, hepatic stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) expression was decreased in Cyp1b1-null mice, and the attenuated diet-induced obesity and lower serum LPC 18:0 in the Cyp1b1-null mice is elevated after SCD1 overexpression, suggesting that SCD1 is correlated with CYP1B1-induced obesity. These studies establish a biochemical link between cytochromes P450, lipids, and metabolic disorders and suggest that inhibition of CYP1B1 could be target for antiobesity drugs.
A biomarker is a molecular indicator of
pathogenic processes or
physiological responses to xenobiotic exposure. Nuclear magnetic resonance-
and mass-spectrometry-based metabolomics enables the global profiling
of metabolites in biofluids and tissues. Using this approach, biomarker
discovery was carried out on various metabolic diseases.[1,2] Biomarkers can be used to diagnose diseases and to elucidate the
mechanism and biochemical pathways leading to disease and drug toxicity,
and to monitor therapy.[3−5] By combination with other high-throughput technologies,
such as proteomics, biomarkers can be used to screen for candidate
drugs to monitor efficacy in clinical trials.[6−8] In addition,
biomarkers hold promise to achieve personalization of disease treatment
and prevention.Obesity is a metabolic disease in which excess
fat has accumulated
in the body through storage in adipose tissue, leading to increased
health problems and reduced life expectancy. Notably, obesity has
become a global problem in the past decade and increases the likelihood
of other metabolic diseases, particularly cardiovascular diseases,
type-2 diabetes mellitus, and cancer.[9,10] Humanobesity
has been subjected to metabolomics analysis, and biomarkers were identified
that may provide information on the pathological conditions of obesity.
Examples include serum branched-chain and aromatic amino acids and
acylcarnitines in older women and men with obesity,[11] plasma lysophosphatidylcholines in adult obesemen,[12] plasma fatty acids in obese adolescents,[13] and serum phosphatidylcholines and lysophaphatidylcholines
in children with obesity.[14]Studies
of Cyp1b1-null mice on low- and high-fat
diets have shown that disruption of this gene provides extensive protection
against obesity and steatotic hepatitis. This is associated with multiple
major changes in gene expression in hepatocytes, including many suggestive
of increased leptin activity and suppressed peroxisome proliferator-activated
receptor α (PPARα) activity (Unpublished data). In the
present study, mass-spectrometry-based metabolomics was adopted for
the discovery of biomarkers related to HFD-induced obesity. LPC 18:0
was identified as a positively related biomarker for obesity along
with a decrease in stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) expression, particularly
in livers of mice on a HFD. These responses are paralleled by a decrease
in serum LPC 18:0 in Cyp1b1-null mice, which is reversed
in CYP1B1-humaniced mice. Further studies indicated
that SCD1 is involved in the effect of CYP1B1 on lipid metabolism.
Experimental
Procedures
Chemicals and Reagents
Lysophosphatidylcholines (LPC
16:0, LPC 18:0, LPC 18:1, LPC 18:2, LPC 20:0, and LPC 22:0) were obtained
from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). All solvents and organic
reagents were of the highest grade commercially available.
Generation
of CYP1B1-Humanized Transgenic Mice
A bacterial
artificial chromosome (BAC) clone containing the complete humanCYP1B1 gene sequence was purified by using a Maxi Prep kit
(QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). The BAC clone was verified by PCR using primers
amplifying specific regions, exons 1, 2, 3, as described previously.[15] The BAC clone DNA containing the humanCYP1B1 gene was microinjected into fertilized FVB/N mouse
eggs after linearization with the restriction enzyme NotI and purification.
Mice positive for the humanCYP1B1 transgene as identified
by PCR analysis were bred with Cyp1b1-null mice.[16] From this breeding, mice positive for the humanCYP1B1 transgene in the Cyp1b1-null background
were designated CYP1B1-humanized mice. The presence
of the humanCYP1B1 transgene was determined using the humanCYP1B1-specific primers to amplify a PCR product of 201
bp that is diagnostic for the humanCYP1B1 transgene.
The mouseCyp1b1 gene and the Tn5 gene encoding aminoglycoside 3′-phosphotransferase primers
were genotyped by PCR to identify the mouseCyp1b1 gene and Cyp1b1-null alleles through the diagnostic
PCR products of 365 bp for Cyp1b1 allele and 460
bp for Cyp1b1-null allele. The CYP1B1-humanized mice were further bred with Cyp1b1-null
mice on C57BL/6N genetic background for at least four generations.
Animal Studies and Treatment
Male, 6-week-old CYP1B1-humanized, Cyp1b1-null, and wild-type
mice, were maintained under a standard 12 h light/12 h dark cycle
with water and chow provided ad libitum. Animal studies were performed
under a protocol approved by the NCI Animal Care and Use Committee
and were in compliance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animal Resources (1996), National Research Council. For high-fat diet
(HFD)-induced obesity, CYP1B1-humanized mice, Cyp1b1-null mice, and wild-type mice were fed for 12 weeks
with a diet consisting of 60% kcal fat (D12492) obtained from Research
Diets (New Brunswick, NJ). Mice treated with a diet consisting of
10% kcal fat (D12450B) were used as the control group. Serum samples
were collected by retro-orbital bleeding at the end of treatment.
Liver and adipose samples were harvested immediately following killing
by CO2 asphyxiation and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen.
All samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis.
Metabolomics
Analysis and Metabolites Quantification
Serum samples were
prepared by adding 10 μL of serum to 190
μL of 67% aqueous acetonitrile (1:2, water/acetonitrile). Samples
were mixed for 5 min and centrifuged at 14 000 rpm for 20 min
at 4 °C to remove protein. A 5 μL aliquot of supernatant
was separated using a 2.1 × 50 mm BEH C18 1.7 μm column
(Waters, Milford, MA) and introduced via electrospray into a Waters
ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization
quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-QTOFMS). The samples were eluted
using a gradient mobile phase with water and acetonitrile containing
0.1% formic acid solution. The parameters of ionization were consistent
with previous reports.[17,18] Data were collected in the positive
mode and negative mode, which with the MS was operated in full-scan
mode from m/z 100 to 1000.The mass signal of ions was processed using MarkerLynx software (Waters,
Milford, MA) to generate a data matrix, including peak area, mass-to-charge
ratio (m/z), and retention time.
The multivariate data matrix was exported into SIMCA-P+12.0 (Umetrics,
Kinnelon, NJ) for principal component analysis (PCA). The ions contributing
significantly to the separation of groups were further investigated
by searching the metabolomics database (METLIN) and comparison with
authentic compounds.Quantitation of serum lysophosphatidylcholine
was performed using
an ACQUITY UPLC system coupled to a Xevo triple quadrupole tandem
mass spectrometer (Waters). Calibration curves (0.2 to 25 μM)
were generated for each metabolite. The following multiple reaction
monitoring (MRM) transitions were monitored: LPC 16:0 (496 →
104; ESI+), LPC 18:0 (524 → 104; ESI+), LPC 18:1 (522 → 104; ESI+), LPC 18:2 (520 →
104; ESI+), LPC 20:0 (552 → 104; ESI+), LPC 22:0 (580 → 104; ESI+), and LPC 17:0 (510
→ 104; ESI+). LPC 17:0 (1.0 uM) was used as the
internal standard.
Gene Expression Analysis
RNA was
extracted using TRIzol
reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) from frozen liver. Complementary
DNA was synthesized from 1 mg total RNA using Superscript II reverse
transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Primers were designed with
qPrimerDepot. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) primer sequences are
shown in Supplementary Table 1 in the Supporting
Information. QPCR was carried out using SYBR green PCR master
mix in an ABI Prism 7900HT sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems,
Foster City, CA). Values were quantified with the comparative CT method,
and mRNA levels were normalized to those of β-actin mRNA. mRNA
levels were expressed as fold change relative to wild-type mice.
Metabolic Assays
For glucose tolerance testing (GTT),
mice were fasted for 16 h and injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with
1.0 g/kg glucose. Blood samples were taken from the tail at 0, 15,
30, 60, and 90 min after injection, and glucose was measured using
a Glucometer (Bayer, Pittsburgh, PA).
Western Blot Analysis
Fifty mg of liver was homogenized
in RIPA buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitors and centrifuged
at 4 °C for 15 min at 15 000 rpm. Liver protein extract
(10 μg) was separated on a 4–15% Tris-HCl gel and transferred
to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Membranes were incubated
with antibodies against humanCYP1B1 (provided by Craig Marcus, Oregon
State University) and SCD1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz,
CA).
In Vivo Overexpression of SCD1 by Adenovirus
Adenovirus-expressing
ratSCD1 (Ad-SCD1)[19] was kindly provided
by Vassilis I. Zannis (Boston University), and control adenovirus
was provided by Shioko Kimura (National Cancer Institute). Ad-Scd1
was amplified in QBI293 cells and purified using two cesium chloride
ultracentrifugation steps. For in vivo transfections, male wild-type
mice and Cyp1b1-null mice were treated with HFD for
6 weeks, and 2 × 109 plaque-forming units of control
adenovirus or Ad-SCD1 (dissolving in 0.9% sterile saline) were injected
into the tail vein in a total volume of 200 μL. The mice were
injected once every 5 days for three cycles, and were killed on the
fifth day after the last adenovirus injection.
Data Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using
GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Two-tailed
Student’s t test and one-way ANOVA was used
to compare the levels of metabolites and changes in gene expression
between wild-type Cyp1b1-null and CYP1B1-humanized mice. Experimental values are presented as mean ±
SEM. P-values of less than 0.05 are considered significant.
Results
Generation of CYP1B1-Humanized Mice
A transgenicmouse
line was constructed using a BAC clone containing the complete humanCYP1B1 gene sequence (exons 1–3) and 5′- and 3′-flanking
sequences (Supplementary Figure 1A in the Supporting
Information). Transgenic mice containing the humanCYP1B1 gene in the mouseCyp1b1-null background
were bred to generate mice homozygous for the CYP1B1 allele. Genomic DNA from wild-type, Cyp1b1-null,
and CYP1B1-humanized mice was amplified with three
different sets of specific primers: humanCYP1B1 (hCYP1B1),
mouseCyp1b1 (mCYP1B1), and the Neomycin resistance
gene (NEO). Amplification of mCYP1B1 PCR product (365 bp) in wild-type
mice and Cyp1b1-null generated a PCR product of 460
bp in both Cyp1b1-null and CYP1B1-humanized mice (Supplementary Figure 1B in the Supporting Information). The humanCYP1B1-derived product of 201 bp is present only in CYP1B1-humanized mice (Supplementary Figure 1C in the Supporting Information). Liver microsomal protein from wild-type, Cyp1b1-null, and CYP1B1-humanized mice
treated with 1.0 μg/kg of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) for 3 days was subjected to Western blotting
for detection of CYP1B1 protein expression. HumanCYP1B1 protein (50
kDa) was only expressed in CYP1B1-humanized mice,
and the mobility was consistent with human recombinant CYP1B1 protein
(Supplementary Figure 1D in the Supporting Information).
Identification of LPC 18:0 as a Biomarker for HFD-Induced Obesity
Energy intake exceeds energy expenditure, which contributes to
the incidence of obesity, which, in turn, is associated with other
metabolic disorders such as diabetes and atherosclerosis.[20] An HFD-induced obesity model was used to identify
biomarkers for obesity. Measurement of body weight revealed that body
mass was significantly elevated by ∼15 and ∼40% at 6
and 11 weeks in HFD-treated mice compared with those on a low-fat
diet (Figure 1A). Serum samples were collected
at 6 and 11 weeks on HFD and analyzed using UPLC-ESI-QTOFMS operating
in positive ionization mode. PCA models distinguished HFD-induced
obesemice from control mice at both 6 and 11 weeks on the diet (Figure 1B). Ions contributing to the separation of HFD-induced
obese and control mice were those deviated from the ion cloud in the
loading scatter plot (Figure 1C). The four
top ions in serum of m/z 524.3697+ at 5.34 min, m/z 520.3376+ at 4.53 min, m/z 522.3536+ at 4.88 min, and m/z 494.3223+ at 4.35 min were found to contribute to separation of the
HFD and control groups. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) fragmentation
showed that all four compounds were similar, as revealed by the presence
of 184+ (C5H15NO4P+) and 104+ (C5H14NO+) daughter ions (Supplementary Figure 2A–E in the Supporting Information). By comparison of retention
times and mass fragmentation patterns to authentic standards, these
four ions were identified as LPC 18:0, LPC 18:2, LPC 18:1, and LPC
16:1 (Supplementary Table 2 in the Supporting
Information). All metabolites belonging to the lysophosphatidylcholine
group are related to obesity.[12,14] The levels of these
metabolites, including other major lysophosphatidylcholines, were
analyzed at the 11-week treatment time point. LPC 18:0, LPC 18:2,
and LPC 20:0 were increased 50.2, 54, and 60% in HFD-obesitymice,
while LPC 16:1 and LPC 18:1 were decreased 54 and 34%, respectively
(Figure 1D). However, other lysophosphatidylcholines
(LPC 16:0 and LPC 22:0) remained unchanged in HFD-fed obesemice with
a weak correlation (Supplementary Figure 3A,B in the Supporting Information). To determine which metabolite was
directly related to obesity, the correlation of the level of metabolites
with adipose mass was calculated. LPC 18:0, LPC 18:2, and LPC 20:0
were positively correlated with the adipose mass, while LPC 16:1 and
LPC 18:1 were negatively correlated with the adipose mass (Figure 2A–E). Among these lysophosphatidylcholines,
LPC 18:0 levels showed the best correlation with the adipose mass
(r = 0.80). Compared with the single LPC 18:1 (r = −0.22) and LPC 18:2 (r = 0.41),
the ratios of LPC 18:0/LPC 18:1 (r = 0.72) and LPC
18:0/LPC 18:2 (r = 0.61) showed better correlations
(Supplementary Figure 3C,D in the Supporting Information). These results indicate that serum lysophosphatidylcholines are
associated with obesity, especially LPC 18:0.
Figure 1
Metabolomics identification
of obesity-related biomarkers. (A)
Body weight of the mice after 6 and 11 weeks of HFD treatment. (B)
PCA model of serum metabolites between the HFD group (n = 10, green) and control group (n = 10, blue).
Each point represents an individual mouse serum sample from the HFD
and control groups. The t[1] and t[2] correspond to principal components 1 and 2, respectively. (C)
Loadings scatter plot from the PCA model of the HFD group and control
group. Each point represents a serum ion obtained in positive mode
(ESI+). The p[1] values represent the
relative abundance of the ions and p[2] values represent
the interclass difference. The top altered lipids are labeled in the
loadings scatter plot. (D) Change of serum LPC in 11-week HFD-treated
mice. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student’s t-test (n = 5 in each group). *, P < 0.05 and **, P < 0.01 compared
with control mice (lower-fat diet).
Figure 2
Correlation of serum lysophosphatidylcholines with adipose mass.
(A–E) Correlation of serum LPC 18:0, LPC 18:2, LPC 16:1, LPC
18:1, and LPC 20:0 levels with adipose mass in HFD-induced obesity.
Metabolomics identification
of obesity-related biomarkers. (A)
Body weight of the mice after 6 and 11 weeks of HFD treatment. (B)
PCA model of serum metabolites between the HFD group (n = 10, green) and control group (n = 10, blue).
Each point represents an individual mouse serum sample from the HFD
and control groups. The t[1] and t[2] correspond to principal components 1 and 2, respectively. (C)
Loadings scatter plot from the PCA model of the HFD group and control
group. Each point represents a serum ion obtained in positive mode
(ESI+). The p[1] values represent the
relative abundance of the ions and p[2] values represent
the interclass difference. The top altered lipids are labeled in the
loadings scatter plot. (D) Change of serum LPC in 11-week HFD-treated
mice. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed Student’s t-test (n = 5 in each group). *, P < 0.05 and **, P < 0.01 compared
with control mice (lower-fat diet).Correlation of serum lysophosphatidylcholines with adipose mass.
(A–E) Correlation of serum LPC 18:0, LPC 18:2, LPC 16:1, LPC
18:1, and LPC 20:0 levels with adipose mass in HFD-induced obesity.
Suppression of Obesity
in Cyp1b1-Null Mice Is Correlated with
Changes in Serum LPC Metabolites
The body weight of Cyp1b1-null mice on a HFD decreases in proportion to suppression
of adiposity. Body weight was significantly decreased from 6 weeks
compared with wild-type mice following treatment with HFD (Figure 3A). To explore the role of loss of CYP1B1 on obesity-related
glucose homeostasis, glucose tolerance tests (GTT) were performed.
GTT revealed that after 11 weeks of HFD challenge, Cyp1b1-null mice displayed significantly reduced blood glucose levels after
glucose loading compared with control mice (Figure 3B). The area under the curve (AUC) for glucose was lower in Cyp1b1-null mice than wild-type mice (Figure 3C). Serum metabolomics analysis demonstrated that the serum
LPC metabolites in Cyp1b1-null mice showed significant
difference from the wild-type mice in the PCA model (Figure 3D). Similarly, the four top ions, m/z 496.3404+ at 4.66 min, m/z 524.3717+ at 5.26 min, m/z 522.3560+ at 4.81 min, and m/z 520.3405+ at 4.46 min in
serum, were identified as LPC 16:0, LPC 18:0, LPC 18:1, and LPC 18:2,
respectively (Figure 3E). Two saturated lysophosphatidylcholines,
LPC 16:0 and LPC 18:0, were decreased 24 and 15% in Cyp1b1-null mice (Figure 4A,D). Two unsaturated
lysophosphatidylcholines, LPC 18:1 and LPC 18:2, were decreased 30
and 13% in Cyp1b1-null mice (Figure 4B,C). The expression of mRNA encoding phosphate cytidylyltransferase
1β (Pcyt1β), involved in the synthesis
of lysophosphatidylcholines, was significantly decreased in Cyp1b1-null mice (Figure 4E), while
other genes related to the metabolism and synthesis of lysophosphatidylcholines
did not exhibit significantly differ between the groups, including
lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase (Lpcat) and
choline phosphotransferase 1 (Chpt1) (Supplementary
Figure 4 in the Supporting Information).
These results extend previous studies showing that resistance to HFD-induced
obesity is associated with changes in fatty acid-selective LPC synthesis
that is readily detected in serum.
Figure 3
Human CYP1B1 induced obesity on HFD. (A)
Typical growth curves
on a HFD. (B) GTT after 11 weeks of HFD. (C) Glucose area under the
curve after 11 weeks of HFD. (D) PCA model of serum metabolites for
wild-type (WT), Cyp1b1-null, and CYP1B1-humanized (hCYP1B1) mice after HFD treatment for 12 weeks. (E) Loadings
scatter plot of PCA. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed
Student’s t test (n = 5 in
each group). *, P < 0.05 and **, P < 0.01 compared with wild-type mice (WT); #, P < 0.05 compared with Cyp1b1-null mice.
Figure 4
Changes of metabolites and genes associated
with the mouse Cyp1b1
knockout and human CYP1B1 overexpression. (A–D) Serum levels
of LPC 18:0, LPC 18:1, LPC 18:2, and LPC 16:0 in Cyp1b1-null, CYP1B1-humanized (hCYP1B1), and wild-type
(WT) mice after treated with HFD for 12 weeks. The concentrations
of serum lysophosphatidylcholines were measured by triple quadrupole
tandem mass spectrometry. (E,F) Hepatic Pcyt1β and Scd1 mRNA levels. The mRNA levels were normalized
to those of β-actin mRNA. Statistical analysis was performed
using two-tailed Student’s t test (n = 5 in each group). *, P < 0.05 and
**, P < 0.01 compared with wild-type mice (WT); #, P < 0.05 compared with Cyp1b1-null mice.
HumanCYP1B1 induced obesity on HFD. (A)
Typical growth curves
on a HFD. (B) GTT after 11 weeks of HFD. (C) Glucose area under the
curve after 11 weeks of HFD. (D) PCA model of serum metabolites for
wild-type (WT), Cyp1b1-null, and CYP1B1-humanized (hCYP1B1) mice after HFD treatment for 12 weeks. (E) Loadings
scatter plot of PCA. Statistical analysis was performed using two-tailed
Student’s t test (n = 5 in
each group). *, P < 0.05 and **, P < 0.01 compared with wild-type mice (WT); #, P < 0.05 compared with Cyp1b1-null mice.Changes of metabolites and genes associated
with the mouseCyp1b1
knockout and humanCYP1B1 overexpression. (A–D) Serum levels
of LPC 18:0, LPC 18:1, LPC 18:2, and LPC 16:0 in Cyp1b1-null, CYP1B1-humanized (hCYP1B1), and wild-type
(WT) mice after treated with HFD for 12 weeks. The concentrations
of serum lysophosphatidylcholines were measured by triple quadrupole
tandem mass spectrometry. (E,F) Hepatic Pcyt1β and Scd1 mRNA levels. The mRNA levels were normalized
to those of β-actin mRNA. Statistical analysis was performed
using two-tailed Student’s t test (n = 5 in each group). *, P < 0.05 and
**, P < 0.01 compared with wild-type mice (WT); #, P < 0.05 compared with Cyp1b1-null mice.
Human CYP1B1 as a Potential
Therapeutic Target for Treatment
of Obesity
To further explore the effect of humanCYP1B1
on HFD-induced obesity, male CYP1B1-humanized mice
were fed a HFD. The body weights of CYP1B1-humanized
mice were higher than those of the Cyp1b1-null mice
after 8 weeks of HFD treatment (Figure 3A).
GTT revealed that after 11 weeks of HFD challenge, CYP1B1-humanized mice displayed significantly increased blood glucose levels
after glucose loading compared with Cyp1b1-null (Figure 3B), and the glucose AUC was higher in CYP1B1-humanized mice than in Cyp1b1-null mice (Figure 3C). Serum metabolomics analysis demonstrated that
the PCA model discriminated the CYP1B1-humanized
mice from Cyp1b1-null mice (Figure 3D). Three serum-decreased lysophosphatidylcholines, LPC 18:0,
LPC 18:1, and LPC 18:2, in Cyp1b1-null mice were
significantly increased in CYP1B1-humanized mice
(Figure 4A–C). Compared with Cyp1b1-null mice, the levels of LPC 18:0, LPC 18:1, and
LPC 18:2 were increased 8.6, 19, and 17% in CYP1B1-humanized mice. The levels of LPC 16:0, LPC 20:0, and LPC 22:0 did
not show significant differences between Cyp1b1-null
and CYP1B1-humanized mice (Supplementary Figure 5A,B
in the Supporting Information). In addition,
expression of Pcyt1β was higher in CYP1B1-humanized mice than in Cyp1b1-null
mice (Figure 4E). These observations confirm
that the protection of CYP1B1 inhibition against HFD-induced obesity
is reversed after the introduction of the humanCYP1B1 gene to the Cyp1b1-null mice, suggesting that the inhibition of humanCYP1B1 might function as a potential therapeutic target for obesity.
CYP1B1 Influence on Metabolic Profile Partially via Induction
of SCD1
Previous studies indicated that hepatic SCD1 is one
of the main regulators of the altered balance between long-chain fatty-acid-derived
lysophosphatidylcholines in vivo under pathological conditions.[21,22] Expression of hepatic Scd1 mRNA is significantly
decreased in Cyp1b1-null mice compared with wild-type
mice, particularly on a HFD (Unpublished data). This was also shown
for Cyp1b1-null mice following treatment with HFD
(Figure 4F). In contrast with Cyp1b1-null mice, the expression level of Scd1 was elevated
in CYP1B1-humanized mice. To investigate whether
SCD1 regulates the synthesis of lysophosphatidylcholines in vivo,
a recombinant adenovirus expressing SCD1 (Ad-Scd1) was generated.
Ad-Scd1 enhanced hepatic SCD1 protein expression, and this forced
expression was correlated with increased body weight of both wild-type
and Cyp1b1-null mice compared with the control group
(Ad-ctr) without SCD1 overexpression (Figure 5A,B). The decreased LPC 18:0 levels in Cyp1b1-null
mice were also reversed in the Cyp1b1-null mice treated
with Ad-Scd1 (Figure 5C). However, LPC 18:0
levels were unchanged in wild-type mice with forced expression of
SCD1. The levels of LPC18:1 and LPC18:2 were also not significantly
increased in the Cyp1b1-null mice with forced expression
of SCD1 by Ad-Scd1 (Supplementary Figure 6A,B in the Supporting Information). These results suggest that while
hepatic SCD1 mediates the condition of obesity in both wild-type and Cyp1b1-null mice, the effect may not be due exclusively
to altered LPC levels.
Figure 5
SCD1 mediates CYP1B1-induced obesity. (A) Western blot
analysis
of SCD1 in the liver of wild-type (+/+) and Cyp1b1-null (−/−) mice with SCD1 overexpression. (B) Body
weight of wild-type (WT) and Cyp1b1-null mice after
three Ad-Scd1 injections. (C) Serum levels of LPC 18:0 in Cyp1b1-null and wild-type mice with SCD1 overexpression.
The concentrations of serum lysophosphatidylcholines were measured
by triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. Statistical analysis
was performed using two-tailed Student’s t test (n = 5 in each group). *, P < 0.05 compared with Cyp1b1-null mice treated
with Ad-ctr (Ad-ctr Cyp1b1-null).
SCD1 mediates CYP1B1-induced obesity. (A) Western blot
analysis
of SCD1 in the liver of wild-type (+/+) and Cyp1b1-null (−/−) mice with SCD1 overexpression. (B) Body
weight of wild-type (WT) and Cyp1b1-null mice after
three Ad-Scd1 injections. (C) Serum levels of LPC 18:0 in Cyp1b1-null and wild-type mice with SCD1 overexpression.
The concentrations of serum lysophosphatidylcholines were measured
by triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. Statistical analysis
was performed using two-tailed Student’s t test (n = 5 in each group). *, P < 0.05 compared with Cyp1b1-null mice treated
with Ad-ctr (Ad-ctr Cyp1b1-null).
Discussion
The current study demonstrates
a direct correlation between CYP1B1
and SCD1 expression in the regulation of lipid metabolism that contributes
to obesity. Mice lacking CYP1B1 fed a high-fat diet are leaner than
their corresponding wild-type and CYP1B1-humanized
counterparts. Adenoviral-mediated forced expression of SCD1 in the
livers of Cyp1b1-null mice elevated adiposity found
in the HFD-fed wild-type mice. One potential mechanism for this correlation
is that the metabolism of saturated C18 and C16 fatty acids by SCD1
enhances their mitochondrial oxidation instead of conversion to triglycerides.
However, forced SCD1 expression also increased the obesity of HFD-fed
wild-type mice without the corresponding increase in LPC 18:0 levels
noted in the Cyp1b1-null mice. In addition, there
was no change in LPC 18:1 and 18:2 in the Cyp1b1-null
mice administered the Ad-Scd1. Thus, other changes in hepatic gene
expression in Cyp1b1-null mice might also contribute
to this same metabolic switch. The present work suggests that while
a systemic decrease in CYP1B1 activity lowers obesity through a combination
of gene expression changes, SCD1 likely has a dominant effect. Recent
work also shows that while systemic SCD1 suppression similarly lowers
obesity, the primary effect is on the skin epidermis.[23]Scd1 disruption in the epidermis prevents
diet-induced obesity, whereas disruption of the gene in hepatocytes
lowers liver triglycerides but not obesity. This SCD1 loss is conveniently
tracked by changes in phospholipid metabolism. UPLC-ESI-QTOFMS was
adopted to examine the change of serum metabolites in wild-type mice, Cyp1b1-null mice, and CYP1B1-humanized
mice following HFD treatment. The levels of several phospholipids
were affected in HFD-induced obesemice, with LPC 18:0 showing a positive
correlation with the fat mass. LPC 18:0 increased in HFD-fed wild-type
mice and decreased in Cyp1b1-null mice with a lean
phenotype. After Cyp1b1-null mice were reconstituted
with the humanCYP1B1 gene, the level of LPC 18:0
recovered. Additionally, stimulation of preadipocyte C3H10T1/2 cells
by an adipogenic hormonal mixture consisting of insulin, dexamethasone,
and methylisobutylxanthine can substantially induce CYP1B1 expression.[24,25] These results provide evidence that CYP1B1 can affect lipid metabolism.The effect of CYP1B1 on obesity via phospholipid metabolism is
in agreement with previous studies, demonstrating that phosphatidylcholines
are closely related to obesity in humans.[26] Metabolomics analysis also indicated that the composition of lysophosphatidylcholines
in serum was different between obese and lean animals and humans,[12,27] in agreement with the present study where lower levels of LPC 18:0
were found in lean mice compared with their obese counterparts. It
was also reported that lysophosphatidylcholines plays a role in the
development of insulin resistance as well as proinflammatory and proatherogenic
conditions.[12] Consistent with change of
metabolites, the hepatic expression of Pcyt1β, which is involved in lysophosphatidylcholine synthesis, shows a
similar trend to serum LPC 18:0 levels between lean and obesemice.
Hepatic SCD1 expression was decreased in HFD-fed Cyp1b1-null mice but increased in HFD-fed CYP1B1-humanized
mice, probably contributing to the change of lysophosphatidylcholines.
SCD1 catalyzes the generation of monounsaturated fatty acids from
saturated fatty acids that are either synthesized de novo or derived
from the diet. This is a critical control point in the development
of metabolic diseases through the mediation of lipid metabolism and
insulin response, especially for obesity and insulin resistance.[28] It is known that Scd1 disruption
can protect mice from HFD and leptin-deficiency-induced obesity.[29]Scd1-null mice show reduced
fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis when treated with a high-carbohydrate
diet, partially due to the decrease in sterol regulatory element-binding
protein 1 (Srebp-1) and expression of its target
genes such as fatty acid synthase (Fasn) and the
fatty acid elongase (Elovl6).[30] Insulin resistance under the condition of obesity is closely
linked with lipid metabolism. Therefore, the decreased lipid synthesis
contributes to the enhanced insulin sensitivity when the expression
of SCD1 was inhibited. Indeed, Scd1-null mice enhance
insulin sensitivity and insulin signaling pathways in various tissues,
including muscle and white adipose tissue.[31] In the current study, GTT indicated that insulin sensitivity in
HFD-induced obesemice is correlated with the expression of SCD1.
Several studies have demonstrated that serum lysophosphatidylcholines
are one indicator for the change of body weight in HFD-induced obese
animal models.[27] These observations provide
evidence that SCD1 and lipid metabolism have a major influence on
CYP1B1-improved obesity.CYP1B1, a member of the cytochrome
P450 superfamily, is found in
humans and mice and is involved in the metabolism of both endogenous
and exogenous substrates. The CYP1B1 gene is expressed in several
tissues, including the eye, uterus, and skin.[32] It is responsible for the activation of carcinogens, including polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons, N-heterocyclic amines, and
arylamines.[33] Endogenous compounds metabolized
by CYP1B1 include steroid hormones and lipids that regulate the metabolism,
accumulation, and distribution of adipose tissues.[34] Among the lipids, the metabolism of arachidonic acid is
carried out by CYP1B1.[35] Arachidonic acid
is the primary source of fatty acids that are esterified to form cell
membrane glycerophospholipids, which are associated with obesity and
insulin resistance.[36] A previous study
reported that treatment with arachidonic acid resulted in a decrease
in SCD1 enzyme activity and Scd1 mRNA in 3T3-L1 adipocytes.[37] The loss of CYP1B1 in mice could affect the
metabolism of arachidonic acid in vivo, suggesting that the inhibited
SCD1 expression might result from the decrease in arachidonic acid
metabolism, leading to an antiobesity effect.Because Cyp1b1-null mice are protected against
HFD-induced obesity, the issue arises whether humanCYP1B1 shows a
similar pro-obesity effect. Species differences have been observed
in the response to xenobiotics exposure, especially between humans
and mice,[38] and are attributed to genetic
differences between CYPs and various xenobiotic receptors between
humans and mice.[39] For example, there are
at least five Cyp2d genes in mice, whereas a single
active member CYP2D6 with high polymorphism is found
in humans. None of these genes encodes a protein that has the same
enzymatic activity as CYP2D6.[40] After introducing
the humanCYP1B1 gene into Cyp1b1-null mice, the change of body weight and glucose metabolism in CYP1B1-humanized mice responded to HFD in a manner similar
to wild-type mice, suggesting no significant differences in the HFD-induced
obesity effect between mouse and humanCYP1B1. A recent study reported
that cotreatment with rifampicin and isoniazid can cause accumulation
of hepatotoxin protoporphyrin IX in the liver through pregnane X receptor
(PXR)-mediated alteration of the heme biosynthesis in PXR-humanized mouse.[41] These studies demonstrate
that humanized-animal models are a valuable tool to evaluate the effect
of human CYPs or xenobiotic receptors on xenobiotic exposure and disease
susceptibility.In conclusion, metabolomics revealed that serum
LPC 18:0 is a positive
biomarker for HFD-induced obesity. Suppression of obesity in Cyp1b1-null mice is paralleled by changes in serum LPC metabolites.
The CYP1B1-humanized mouse model revealed that humanCYP1B1 shows a similar response to HFD to the mouseCYP1B1. Further
studies demonstrate SCD1 has a major influence on CYP1B1-improved
obesity. The finding that humanCYP1B1 influences lipid homeostasis
via SCD1 and the lysophosphatidylcholine pathway suggests that the
inhibition of CYP1B1 could be a clinical target for the treatment
of obesity. However, the precise mechanism by which CYP1B1 influences
lipid metabolism remains to be determined.
Authors: Y Masubuchi; T Iwasa; S Hosokawa; T Suzuki; T Horie; S Imaoka; Y Funae; S Narimatsu Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1997-09 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Abishek Iyer; David P Fairlie; Johannes B Prins; Bruce D Hammock; Lindsay Brown Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: J T Buters; S Sakai; T Richter; T Pineau; D L Alexander; U Savas; J Doehmer; J M Ward; C R Jefcoate; F J Gonzalez Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-03-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christopher B Newgard; Jie An; James R Bain; Michael J Muehlbauer; Robert D Stevens; Lillian F Lien; Andrea M Haqq; Svati H Shah; Michelle Arlotto; Cris A Slentz; James Rochon; Dianne Gallup; Olga Ilkayeva; Brett R Wenner; William S Yancy; Howard Eisenson; Gerald Musante; Richard S Surwit; David S Millington; Mark D Butler; Laura P Svetkey Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Benjamin J Moyer; Itzel Y Rojas; Joanna S Kerley-Hamilton; Krishnamurthy V Nemani; Heidi W Trask; Carol S Ringelberg; Barjor Gimi; Eugene Demidenko; Craig R Tomlinson Journal: Nutr Res Date: 2017-06-28 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Erin P Madeen; Christiane V Löhr; Hannah You; Lisbeth K Siddens; Sharon K Krueger; Roderick H Dashwood; Frank J Gonzalez; William M Baird; Emily Ho; Lisa Bramer; Katrina M Waters; David E Williams Journal: Mol Carcinog Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 4.784