Literature DB >> 24683564

Dental implants in cleft lip, alveolus, and palate patients: a systematic review.

Kai Wermker, Susanne Jung, Ulrich Joos, Johannes Kleinheinz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Missing teeth are a major problem in cleft patients, who require specialized prosthetic management, including dental implants. The aim of this review was to investigate the optimal date for implant insertion in patients born with cleft lip and palate after bone grafting and to assess the long-term prognosis of the inserted dental implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the current literature electronically in several databases and additional hand searching were performed. Relevant publications were assessed with regard to their evidence according to the guidelines of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
RESULTS: Forty-nine publications (prospective and retrospective clinical studies, case series, and case reports) were included for analysis, but only 18 clinical papers reported survival rates for dental implants (in all, 670 implants in 460 cleft patients). Most studies were evidence level 3b (case-control studies) or 4 (case series, case reports). Reported 5-year survival rates for dental implants in cleft patients ranged from 80% to 96% (mean, 88.6%). Implant placement is favored after growth is complete and is generally recommended within 4 to 6 months after bone grafting.
CONCLUSIONS: Dental implants in patients with cleft lip and palate show high success rates and allow for sufficient oral rehabilitation. However, because of a lack of sufficient prospective clinical studies on dental implants in cleft patients, the available evidence is poor and insufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24683564     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  5 in total

1.  Oral health related quality of life in cleft lip and palate patients rehabilitated with conventional prostheses or dental implants.

Authors:  Piero Papi; Rita Giardino; Pierpaolo Sassano; Giulia Amodeo; Giorgio Pompa; Piero Cascone
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

2.  Oral Rehabilitation with Zygomatic Implants in a Patient with Cleft Palate.

Authors:  Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes de Oliveira; Mariana Schaffer Brackmann; Larissa Carvalho Trojan; Paulo Domingos Ribeiro Júnior; Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2019-05-06

3.  Long-term follow-up of mandibular dental arch changes in patients with complete non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip, alveolus, and palate.

Authors:  Sariesendy Sumardi; Benny S Latief; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Edwin M Ongkosuwito; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Mette A R Kuijpers
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Expression Analysis of FGF/FGFR and FOX Family Proteins in Mucosal Tissue Obtained from Orofacial Cleft-Affected Children.

Authors:  Māra Pilmane; Nityanand Jain; Zane Vitenberga-Verza
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-10

5.  Changes in maxillary dental arch morphology after implant treatment in the alveolar cleft region.

Authors:  Kilwoo Ahn; Hitoshi Sato; Yuji Kurihara; Hiroshi Ogura; Tatsuo Shirota
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2020-12-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.