Literature DB >> 24683289

On the estimation of a binary response model in a selected population.

Francesco Claudio Stingo1, Elena Stanghellini2, Rosa Capobianco3.   

Abstract

A generalization of the Probit model is presented, with the extended skew-normal cumulative distribution as a link function, which can be used for modelling a binary response variable in the presence of selectivity bias. The estimate of the parameters via ML is addressed, and inference on the parameters expressing the degree of selection is discussed. The assumption underlying the model is that the selection mechanism influences the unmeasured factors and does not affect the explanatory variables. When this assumption is violated, but other conditional independencies hold, then the model proposed here is derived. In particular, the instrumental variable formula still applies and the model results at the second stage of the estimating procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  directed acyclic graph; extended skew-normal distribution; hidden truncation; instrumental variables; self-selection; unobserved confounder

Year:  2012        PMID: 24683289      PMCID: PMC3968872          DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2011.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference        ISSN: 0378-3758            Impact factor:   1.111


  7 in total

1.  Sensitivity analysis for the assessment of causal vaccine effects on viral load in HIV vaccine trials.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Ronald J Bosch; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Modelling bounded health scores with censored skew-normal distributions.

Authors:  J L Hutton; E Stanghellini
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Comparison of maximum statistics for hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative.

Authors:  Gang Zheng; Zehua Chen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Estimating probit models with self-selected treatments.

Authors:  Jay Bhattacharya; Dana Goldman; Daniel McCaffrey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The Theory of Path Coefficients a Reply to Niles's Criticism.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1923-05       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Response and non-response to postal questionnaire follow-up in a clinical trial--a qualitative study of the patient's perspective.

Authors:  Rachel A Nakash; Jane L Hutton; Sarah E Lamb; Simon Gates; Joanne Fisher
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Mechanical supports for acute, severe ankle sprain: a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S E Lamb; J L Marsh; J L Hutton; R Nakash; M W Cooke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.