| Literature DB >> 24683268 |
L Sitoki1, R Kurmayer2, E Rott3.
Abstract
The Nyanza Gulf is a large shallow bay of Lake Victoria suffering from eutrophication by human activities. In order to characterize the harmful algal bloom formation as a consequence of eutrophication, both spatially and seasonally, environmental conditions, phytoplankton community composition, and microcystin (MC) concentrations were investigated monthly from Kisumu Bay, and bimonthly from the center of the gulf, as well as quarterly from the Rusinga Channel and the main basin of Lake Victoria between July 2008 to September 2009. The sites located in Kisumu Bay and the central gulf were most strongly affected by eutrophication, including increased nutrient concentrations and phytoplankton growth. More than 90% of the samples obtained from the gulf were dominated by cyanobacteria, whereas diatoms only dominated in the samples obtained from Rusinga Channel and the main lake. In general Microcystis accounted for the largest part (> 50-90%) of cyanobacterial biovolume. MCs were found in 35 (54%) out of 65 samples and were detected throughout the study period in the gulf, but only in two out of eight samples from the Rusinga Channel and the main lake. A significant linear relationship between Microcystis biovolume and MC concentration was observed (n = 65, R2 = 0.88, p <0.001). Highest MC concentrations were recorded in Kisumu Bay between November and March (max. 81 μg l-1) when Microcystis showed max. biovolume (18 mm3 l-1 in November 2008). The results suggest that seasonal variability did not outweigh the spatial differences in phytoplankton composition and MC production that is seasonally persistent in Kisumu Bay.Entities:
Keywords: Microcystis; harmful algal blooms; health risk; horizontal distribution; seasonality; toxicity
Year: 2012 PMID: 24683268 PMCID: PMC3968937 DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1062-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hydrobiologia ISSN: 0018-8158 Impact factor: 2.694
Fig. 1Map of Lake Victoria, Kenya sector, showing Nyanza Gulf and the locations of the five sampling stations (NG1, NG2, NG3, NG4, KO5)
Temporal variation of environmental parameters at nearshore (site NG1)
| Date | Temp (μg °C) | Cond (μS cm−1) | Secchi (m) | SRP (μg l−1) | TP (μg l−1) | SiO2 (mg l−1) | NO3–N (μg l−1) | NH4–N (μg l−1) | TN (μg l−1) | TN:TP (ratio) | MC (μg l−1) | Rain (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul-08 | 24.9 | 181 | 0.30 | 108 | 398 | 33 | 40 | 192 | 1,713 | 4 | na | 107 |
| Aug-08 | 27.2 | 131 | 0.20 | 96 | 378 | 48 | 41 | 209 | 1,813 | 5 | na (274)a | 127 |
| Sep-08 | 27.7 | 167 | 0.25 | 95 | 316 | 32 | 35 | 207 | 1,551 | 5 | na | 94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Jan-09 | 26.8 | 167 | 0.20 | 64 | 213 | 29 | 32 | 58 | 591 | 3 | 4.5 | 114 |
| Feb-09 | 27.0 | 158 | 0.20 | 55 | 193 | 34 | 31 | 52 | 561 | 3 | <0.01 | 50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Jun-09 | 25.8 | 166 | 0.22 | 119 | 199 | 25 | 22 | 125 | 1,197 | 6 | 4.0 | 28 |
| Jul-09 | 26.2 | 176 | 0.20 | 102 | 233 | 32 | 76 | 145 | 1,706 | 7 | 6.9 | 31 |
| Aug-09 | 26.3 | 167 | 0.20 | 9 | 291 | 29 | 25 | 182 | na | na | 3.5 | 77 |
| Sep-09 | 26.7 | 171 | 0.20 | 74 | 84 | 30 | 8 | 114 | 411 | 5 | 8.1 | 46 |
na not analyzed
Italic values indicate the wet season. Values for temperature and conductivity were averages from the upper 10 m of the water column, whereas SRP, TP, SiO2, NO3–N, NH4–N, TN, and MC were analyzed from depth-integrated samples
aValues in parentheses refer to surface water samples
Median and percentiles (25, 75%) of physico-chemical and biological parameters recorded at the five stations in Nyanza Gulf
| Temp (°C) | Cond* (μS cm−1) | Secchi* (m) | SRP (μg l−1) | TP (μg l−1) | SiO2* (mg l−1) | NO3–N (μg l−1) | NH4–N* (μg l−1) | TN (mg l−1) | TN:TP (atomic ratio) | Biovolume (mm3 l−1) | MC* (μg l−1) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||||
| 27.1 | 171 | 0.2 | 86 | 159 | 31 | 58 | 126 | 1.39 | 6.1 | 10.9 | 17.3 | 1.1 | 20 |
| (26.5,27.5) | (163,174)a | (0.2,0.25)a | (46,100) | (82,307) | (27,32)a | (24,136) | (106,142)a | (0.75,1.82) | (3.9,15.8) | (6.2,15.1) | (5.6,59.2)a | (0.45,1.75)a | (15,23.5) |
|
| |||||||||||||
| 25.4 | 160 | 0.35 | 68 | 220 | 28 | 42 | 105 | 1.41 | 8.1 | 10.8 | 14.2 | 1.2 | 16.5 |
| (24.6,26.2) | (146,164)a | (0.3,0.45)a,b | (47,87) | (150,253) | (26,31)a | (24,59) | (70,111)a,b | (1.07,1.9) | (6.5,8.6) | (4.5,15) | (3.6,26.4)a | (0.85,1.6)a | (13,24.5) |
|
| |||||||||||||
| 25.7 | 151 | 0.55 | 75 | 203 | 21 | 34 | 89 | 1.38 | 7.5 | 5.1 | 13.4 | 1.25 | 16 |
| (25.2,26.6) | (148,152)a,b | (0.4,0.6)a,b | (39,88) | (138,266) | (21,21)a,b | (16,97) | (64,107)a,b | (1.11,1.73) | (6.5,8.1) | (3.9,8) | (5.6,20.3)a | (1.15,1.35)a | (14,19.5) |
|
| |||||||||||||
| 25.9 | 117 | 0.95 | 31 | 199 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 1.33 | 10.3 | 6.4 | 0.01 | 2.1 | 18.5 |
| (25.4,26.9) | (114,122)b | (0.8,1.35)b | (31,46) | (103,298) | (6,12)b | (7,96) | (12,21)b | (0.94,1.88) | (5.3,13) | (5.2,8.5) | (0.01,3.1)a | (1.8,2.25)a | (14,28.5) |
|
| |||||||||||||
| 25.8 | 106 | 1.55 | 34 | 115 | 6 | 14 | 63 | 1.23 | 14.2 | 5.0 | 0.01 | 2.2 | 23.5 |
| (25.4,26.8) | (101,112)b | (1.15,2.5)b | (26,38) | (84,188) | (5,11)b | (4,148) | (51,80)a,b | (0.73,1.63) | (8,15) | (4.2,6.4) | (0.01,0.5)a | (1.8,2.4)a | (19,26) |
H Shannon–Wiener diversity index; R species richness
Asterisks mark parameters significantly different between sites (P < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis one way ANOVA). Identical superscripts (a, b) indicate subgroups not significantly different at 0.05 (Tukey post hoc pairwise comparison, n = 4)
Fig. 2Absolute phytoplankton biovolume composition (mm3 l−1) assigned to phytoplankton classes or families (A) and phytoplankton genera (B) as recorded monthly from 2008 to 2009 at sampling station NG1. For the sake of clarity, only genera contributing >5% to total phytoplankton biovolume are shown. For species composition, see Supplement Table 1. Top bar indicates the periods of dry and wet seasons
Fig. 3Absolute phytoplankton biovolume composition (mm3 l−1) assigned to phytoplankton classes or families (A) and phytoplankton genera (B) as recorded at four dates in 2008 (Nov) and in 2009 (Mar, Jul, and Sept.) for each sampling station (NG1, NG2, NG3, NG4, and KO5). For the sake of clarity, only genera contributing >5% to total phytoplankton biovolume are shown. For species composition, see Supplement Table 1
Frequency of occurrence (%) of MC variants and proportion in total MC (mean ± SE) as recorded from field samples (n = 35) and Microcystis strains (n = 12)
| MC variant | M + H+ | Structural variant | Retention (min) | Frequency | Proportion | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Field | Strains | Field | Strains | ||||
| MC1 | 1,024 | [Asp3] MC-RR | 14.1–14.2 | 11 | 0 | 5.4 ± 4 | 0 |
| MC2 | 1,038 | MC-RR | 15.4 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0.8 ± 0.8 |
| MC3 | 1,063 | [NMeSer7] MC-YRa | 16.6–17.0 | 8 | 58 | 6.3 ± 3.8 | 5.2 ± 1.6 |
| MC4 | 1,031 | [Asp3] MC-YR | 17.9–18.0 | 0 | 58 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 32 ± 8.2 |
| MC5 | 1,045 | MC-YR | 18.5–18.8 | 62 | 58 | 31 ± 52 | 17 ± 4.6 |
| MC6 | 995 | MC-LR | 19.9–20.1 | 89 | 92 | 50 ± 6 | 32 ± 7 |
| Unknown | 22.1–25.8 | 46 | 50 | 6.8 ± 3 | 14 ± 9 | ||
aDescribed by Okello et al. (2010b)