Literature DB >> 24683213

Effects of flutamide on [methyl-(3)h]-choline uptake in human prostate cancer-3 cells: a pilot study.

Fatma Al-Saeedi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography using [methyl-(11)C]-choline is effective in imaging many types of cancer, especially prostate cancer (PC). The antiandrogen flutamide is often used as part of the initial treatment of PC. Data on the effect of flutamide on and methylcholine incorporation into PC-3 cells are lacking in the experimental and literature work.
OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to assess whether human PC-3 cells are susceptible to flutamide and whether the drug modulates the uptake of [methyl-(3)H]-choline into these cells.
METHODS: PC-3 cells were treated for 3 days with flutamide (≤100 nmol/L), inhibiting growth by 20% to 70% with control cells included. Two viability tests (cytotoxic analyses), the thiazole blue assay and the trypan blue exclusion method, were used to determine the median inhibitory concentration for flutamide (10 nmol/L). Control and flutamide-treated cells were incubated with [methyl-(3)H]-choline for 10 minutes and then in nonradioactive medium for 10 minutes to simulate the rapid blood clearance of [methyl-(11)C]-choline tracer that occurs within 5 to 20 minutes, and then extracted using organic and aqueous solvents to determine the intracellular distribution of the tracer. Protein assay and flow-cytometry analysis were used to determine protein content and DNA synthesis in both control and treated cells. The uptake of [methyl-(3)H]-choline was normalized to protein content and expressed as mean (SD) dpm/1Jg protein (n = 6).
RESULTS: PC-3 cell proliferation was inhibited with flutamide treatment. After treatment of PC-3 cells with flutamide 10 nmol/L for 3 days, cells accumulated DNA during the S phase. Mean (SD) [methyl-(3)H]-choline uptake was found to be significantly lower with flutamide 10-nmol/L-treated cells compared with control cells (65.95 [0.72] vs 114.21 [0.57] dpm/1Jg protein; P < 0.001); the difference between the 5-nmol/L-treated cells and controls was nonsignificant.
CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, flutamide inhibited tumor cell growth and proliferation and decreased (modulated) the uptake of [methyl-(3)H]-choline into androgen receptor-negative PC-3 cells. These results suggest that flutamide might inhibit proliferation by an androgen-independent mechanism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PC-3 cells; PET; [methyl-3H]-choline; flutamide; radiopharmaceuticals; tumor

Year:  2007        PMID: 24683213      PMCID: PMC3967349          DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2007.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp        ISSN: 0011-393X


  56 in total

Review 1.  Measuring response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Effects of androgen suppression by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and flutamide on lipid metabolism in men with prostate cancer: focus on lipoprotein(a).

Authors:  L Denti; G Pasolini; P Cortellini; S Ferretti; L Sanfelici; F Ablondi; G Valenti
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Preliminary quantitative microradiography study into the distribution of bone mineralization within the basal bone of the human edentulous mandible.

Authors:  R S Hobson; A D Beynon
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.633

4.  A role for estrogen receptor beta in the regulation of growth of the ventral prostate.

Authors:  Z Weihua; S Makela; L C Andersson; S Salmi; S Saji; J I Webster; E V Jensen; S Nilsson; M Warner; J A Gustafsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Synthesis and evaluation of 18F-labeled choline as an oncologic tracer for positron emission tomography: initial findings in prostate cancer.

Authors:  T R DeGrado; R E Coleman; S Wang; S W Baldwin; M D Orr; C N Robertson; T J Polascik; D T Price
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Androgen receptor gene expression in human prostate carcinoma cell lines.

Authors:  W D Tilley; C M Wilson; M Marcelli; M J McPhaul
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  The effects of sialoadenectomy & flutamide on skin development.

Authors:  H S Inalöz; M A Ketani; S S Inalöz; F Yilmaz; S Ketani
Journal:  Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 0.146

8.  In vitro assessment of 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, L-methionine and thymidine as agents to monitor the early response of a human adenocarcinoma cell line to radiotherapy.

Authors:  K Higashi; A C Clavo; R L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  11C-choline positron emission tomography for the evaluation after treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  I J de Jong; J Pruim; P H Elsinga; W Vaalburg; H J A Mensink
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Tracer feasibility for monitoring tumor radiotherapy: a quadruple tracer study with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose or fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyuridine, L-[methyl-14C]methionine, [6-3H]thymidine, and gallium-67.

Authors:  K Kubota; K Ishiwata; R Kubota; S Yamada; M Tada; T Sato; T Ido
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  2 in total

1.  Beyond the limits of oxygen: effects of hypoxia in a hormone-independent prostate cancer cell line.

Authors:  A C Mamede; A M Abrantes; L Pedrosa; J E Casalta-Lopes; A S Pires; R J Teixo; A C Gonçalves; A B Sarmento-Ribeiro; C J Maia; M F Botelho
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-09-12

Review 2.  Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Tumor Cell Metabolism and Application to Therapy Response Monitoring.

Authors:  Amarnath Challapalli; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.