Literature DB >> 24683133

π-shaped lymphaticovenular anastomosis: the venous flow sparing technique for the treatment of peripheral lymphedema.

Benoit Ayestaray1, Farid Bekara1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, lymphaticovenular anastomosis has been recognized as an efficient microsurgical treatment for peripheral lymphedema. The technique based on two end-to-side anastomosis is named π-shaped lymphaticovenular anastomosis. This is the venous flow-sparing technique, in which the distal endothelial cells are not sacrificed. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of π-shaped lymphaticovenular anastomosis in chronic lymphedema of the upper and lower limbs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 2010 to August 2011, 20 patients with a peripheral lymphedema were treated by π-shaped lymphaticovenular anastomosis. A total of 12 patients had a lymphedema of the upper limb and 8 patients had a lymphedema of the lower limb. The mean age of the patients was 57.2 years (range, 44-78 years). The mean duration of lymphedema was 6.2 years (range, 1-23 years). The Campisi clinical stage range 2 to 5 (average, 3.3). Every patient was operated under local anesthesia. Four π-shaped lymphaticovenular anastomoses were performed per limb.
RESULTS: The mean caliber of lymphatic vessels used for lymphaticovenular anastomosis was 0.55 mm (range, 0.3-0.8 mm). The mean caliber of subdermal venules was 1.2 mm (range, 0.5-2.1 mm).The average operative time to perform one π-shaped lymphaticovenular anastomosis was 55 minutes (range, 45-65 minutes). A venous backflow was found in 98 lymphaticovenular anastomosis (55.7%). Total 16 patients (80%) had a clinically significant circumferential reduction after surgery. The average volume differential reduction rate was 22.9% (range, 4.9-46.3) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: π-Shaped lymphaticovenular anastomosis is a supermicrosurgical method with a low morbidity to treat peripheral lymphedema. The procedure can easily be performed under local anesthesia, and the postoperative recovery is short. The results of this series demonstrate a clinical efficiency of the technique to reduce chronic lymphedema of the limbs.EBM level IV. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24683133     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1370356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  4 in total

Review 1.  Outcomes of Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Upper Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nikita Gupta; Erik M Verhey; Ricardo A Torres-Guzman; Francisco R Avila; Antonio Jorge Forte; Alanna M Rebecca; Chad M Teven
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-08-25

2.  Efficacy and safety assessment of lymphovenous anastomosis in patients with primary and secondary lymphoedema: A systematic review of prospective evidence.

Authors:  Katharina Rosian; Michal Stanak
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.425

Review 3.  Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis for Lower Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Antonio J Forte; Nawal Khan; Maria T Huayllani; Daniel Boczar; Humza Y Saleem; Xiaona Lu; Oscar J Manrique; Pedro Ciudad; Sarah A McLaughlin
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2020-04-17

4.  Outcomes of Lymphovenous Anastomosis for Lower Extremity Lymphedema: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Erik M Verhey; Lyndsay A Kandi; Yeonsoo S Lee; Bryn E Morris; William J Casey; Alanna M Rebecca; Lisa A Marks; Michael A Howard; Chad M Teven
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-10-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.