Literature DB >> 24682676

Additional value of F-18 FDG PET/CT for initial staging in breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes.

Young Jin Jeong1, Do-Young Kang, Hyun Jin Yoon, Hye Joo Son.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of the preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the initial workup of breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes. Whether the status of the clinical axillary nodal involvement can be considered a parameter for making a decision to omit the preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the situation reported herein was also determined. A total of 178 patients who had newly diagnosed breast cancer and for whom the conventional diagnostic modalities showed no sign of axillary node metastasis were retrospectively enrolled in this study. All the patients underwent preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. The images and histologic results that were obtained were analyzed. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT detected primary lesions in 156 of the 178 patients, with an overall sensitivity of 87.6 %, and false negative results were obtained for 22 patients (12.4 %). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of axillary nodes were 20.8, 86.9, 37.0, 74.8, and 69.1 %, respectively. Extra-axillary node metastasis was identified in two patients (1.1 %) who had internal mammary nodes. There was no distant metastasis, but coexisting primary tumor was detected in five patients (2.8 %). In total, the therapeutic plan was changed based on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in seven (3.9 %) of the 178 patients, but considering only the cases confined to breast cancer, the change occurred in only two patients (1.1 %). ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT almost did not affect the initial staging and treatment plan in breast cancer with clinically negative axillary node. If the axillary node is clinically negative in the preoperative workup of breast cancer, then ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can be omitted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24682676     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2924-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  10 in total

Review 1.  Sensitivity, Specificity and the Diagnostic Accuracy of PET/CT for Axillary Staging in Patients With Stage I-III Cancer: A Systematic Review of The Literature.

Authors:  Judi Kasem; Umar Wazir; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Is Routine Axillary Imaging Necessary in Clinically Node-Negative Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Authors:  Andrea V Barrio; Anita Mamtani; Anne Eaton; Sandra Brennan; Michelle Stempel; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Baseline staging imaging for distant metastasis in women with stages I, II, and III breast cancer.

Authors:  A Arnaout; N P Varela; M Allarakhia; L Grimard; A Hey; J Lau; L Thain; A Eisen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Synchronous Malignancies Identified by PET-CT Scan in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Maya Paran; Katerina Shulman; Boris Kessel; Jasmin Dagan
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2022-04-26

5.  Preoperative [18]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in early stage breast cancer: Rates of distant metastases.

Authors:  Vincent Vinh-Hung; Hendrik Everaert; Karim Farid; Navid Djassemi; Jacqueline Baudin-Veronique; Stefanos Bougas; Yuriy Michailovich; Clarisse Joachim-Contaret; Elsa Cécilia-Joseph; Claire Verschraegen; Nam P Nguyen
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-28

6.  The role of FDG PET/CT in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for localized bone sarcomas.

Authors:  Emanuela Palmerini; Marco Colangeli; Cristina Nanni; Stefano Fanti; Emanuela Marchesi; Anna Paioli; Piero Picci; Silvia Cambioli; Davide Donati; Luca Cevolani; Massimiliano De Paolis; Marco Gambarotti; Stefano Ferrari
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Accuracy of a nomogram to predict the survival benefit of surgical axillary staging in T1 breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yuxia Chen; Yuanqi Zhang; Weixiong Yang; Xiaoping Li; Liling Zhu; Kai Chen; Xiang Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Impact of 18F-FDG PET, PET/CT, and PET/MRI on Staging and Management as an Initial Staging Modality in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sangwon Han; Joon Young Choi
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 10.782

9.  Is there utility for fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scan before surgery in breast cancer? A 15-year overall survival analysis.

Authors:  Justine Perrin; Karim Farid; Hilde Van Parijs; Olena Gorobets; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Nam P Nguyen; Navid Djassemi; Mark De Ridder; Hendrik Everaert
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-04-24

10.  Ex vivo Measurement of the Radioactivity of PET/CT-Guided Biopsy Specimen: Is it Helpful to Confirm the Sampling from a Viable Region of the Tumor and the Nature of the Lesion?

Authors:  Navjot Kaur; Rajender Kumar; Nivedita Rana; Venkata Subramanian Krishnaraju; Bhagwant Rai Mittal
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2022-07-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.