Literature DB >> 24682600

In vitro susceptibility of Candida isolates from organ transplant recipients to newer antifungals.

Alexandra Geusau1, Lukasz Antoniewicz, Christine Poitschek, Elisabeth Presterl, Birgit Willinger.   

Abstract

Organ transplant recipients (OTR) are at higher risk of developing life-threatening infections. In this study, we tested 527 Candida isolates obtained from the oral and genital mucosa from OTR and healthy controls in order to monitor antifungal susceptibility patterns in this particular risk group. Testing was carried out in parallel for already marketed azoles and anidulafungin. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using the E-test(®) for azoles and CLSI broth microdilution for anidulafungin. Overall, there was no difference in the distribution of Candida spp. for both groups, C. albicans being the most frequently isolated Candida sp. followed by C. glabrata. Also, there were only minor differences in the susceptibility patterns to all antifungal agents. All C. albicans isolates were fully susceptible to fluconazole and voriconazole. In C. glabrata, 2.2% (n = 1) were resistant to fluconazole, and 82.6% (n = 38) to itraconazole, and in C. krusei, 66.7% (n = 2) were resistant in itraconazole. All strains were susceptible to voriconazole. Only fluconazole showed a higher rate of resistant C. glabrata isolates for OTR (3.7%), whereas the control group showed only intermediate susceptible and no resistant isolates. As there are no breakpoints established for posaconazole by CLSI, breakpoints determined by EUCAST were used. A total of 87.9% of C. albicans, 81.3% of C. parapsilosis and 66.7% of C. tropicalis were considered susceptible. C. glabrata and C. krusei showed higher MIC values and thus lesser susceptibility than the other Candida species. There were no differences observed between OTR and control groups. For anidulafungin, 99.8% of C. albicans isolates were susceptible, 0.2% were intermediate, whereas for C. glabrata, only 95.3% were susceptible, 0.2% were resistant and 4.5% were interpreted as intermediate. Interestingly, the two resistant isolates were found in the control group. Also, the controls showed a marginally higher percentage of intermediate strains compared to the transplant patients. All in all, resistant isolates were only observed for C. glabrata of the control group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24682600     DOI: 10.1007/s11046-014-9738-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mycopathologia        ISSN: 0301-486X            Impact factor:   2.574


  19 in total

1.  Mucosal Candida infection and colonisation as well as associated risk factors in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  L Antoniewicz; D Relijc; C Poitschek; E Presterl; A Geusau
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Infection in organ-transplant recipients.

Authors:  J A Fishman; R H Rubin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-06-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Delaying the empiric treatment of candida bloodstream infection until positive blood culture results are obtained: a potential risk factor for hospital mortality.

Authors:  Matthew Morrell; Victoria J Fraser; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Emerging fungal diseases.

Authors:  Marcio Nucci; Kieren A Marr
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Further standardization of broth microdilution methodology for in vitro susceptibility testing of caspofungin against Candida species by use of an international collection of more than 3,000 clinical isolates.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; S A Messer; L Boyken; C Rice; S Tendolkar; R J Hollis; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Prevention of invasive fungal infections in liver transplant recipients: the role of prophylaxis with lipid formulations of amphotericin B in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Jesus Fortún; Pilar Martín-Davila; Santiago Moreno; Rafael Barcena; Emilio de Vicente; Alberto Honrubia; Miguel García; Javier Nuño; Angel Candela; Maria Uriarte; Vicente Pintado
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Changing pattern of candidaemia 2001-2006 and use of antifungal therapy at the University Hospital of Vienna, Austria.

Authors:  E Presterl; F Daxböck; W Graninger; B Willinger
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  Anidulafungin versus fluconazole for invasive candidiasis.

Authors:  Annette C Reboli; Coleman Rotstein; Peter G Pappas; Stanley W Chapman; Daniel H Kett; Deepali Kumar; Robert Betts; Michele Wible; Beth P Goldstein; Jennifer Schranz; David S Krause; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Echinocandin and triazole antifungal susceptibility profiles for clinical opportunistic yeast and mold isolates collected from 2010 to 2011: application of new CLSI clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cutoff values for characterization of geographic and temporal trends of antifungal resistance.

Authors:  Michael A Pfaller; Shawn A Messer; Leah N Woosley; Ronald N Jones; Mariana Castanheira
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  A review of the new antifungals: posaconazole, micafungin, and anidulafungin.

Authors:  Noah Scheinfeld
Journal:  J Drugs Dermatol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.114

View more
  1 in total

1.  Influence of Eugenia uniflora Extract on Adhesion to Human Buccal Epithelial Cells, Biofilm Formation, and Cell Surface Hydrophobicity of Candida spp. from the Oral Cavity of Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Luanda B F C Souza; Walicyranison P Silva-Rocha; Magda R A Ferreira; Luiz Alberto L Soares; Terezinha I E Svidzinski; Eveline P Milan; Regina H Pires; Ana Marisa Fusco Almeida; Maria José S Mendes-Giannini; Guilherme Maranhão Chaves
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.