Mary P Cadogan1, Linda R Phillips2, Carolyn E Ziminski3. 1. School of Nursing, Center for the Advancement of Gerontological Nursing Science, University of California, Los Angeles and mcadogan@sonnet.ucla.edu. 2. School of Nursing, Center for the Advancement of Gerontological Nursing Science, University of California, Los Angeles and. 3. College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of the study was to describe, from the perspectives of emergency department (ED) providers, factors that influence quality and safety of transitions home from the ED for vulnerable older adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: A grounded theory approach was used to analyze data from 9 focus groups conducted with ED staff that included representatives from nursing, medicine, pharmacy, social work, and respiratory therapy. RESULTS: From the perspectives of these care providers, 5 antecedent concepts contribute to the perceived quality and safety of transitions from the ED to home. These 5 concepts include the nature of geriatric presentations, provider knowledge, consumer knowledge, the ED resource base, and health care system fractures. Co-occurrence and interaction among the 5 identified antecedents set up conditions for what one focus group participant described as a perfect storm. IMPLICATIONS: Older adults discharged home from the ED without a hospital admission are an increasingly important but understudied group within the transitional care literature. Although they share some similarities with those undergoing different health transitions, their unique needs and the specific characteristics of ED care require a novel approach. The model that emerged in this study provides direction for understanding the complex and interrelated aspects of their transitional care needs.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of the study was to describe, from the perspectives of emergency department (ED) providers, factors that influence quality and safety of transitions home from the ED for vulnerable older adults. DESIGN AND METHODS: A grounded theory approach was used to analyze data from 9 focus groups conducted with ED staff that included representatives from nursing, medicine, pharmacy, social work, and respiratory therapy. RESULTS: From the perspectives of these care providers, 5 antecedent concepts contribute to the perceived quality and safety of transitions from the ED to home. These 5 concepts include the nature of geriatric presentations, provider knowledge, consumer knowledge, the ED resource base, and health care system fractures. Co-occurrence and interaction among the 5 identified antecedents set up conditions for what one focus group participant described as a perfect storm. IMPLICATIONS: Older adults discharged home from the ED without a hospital admission are an increasingly important but understudied group within the transitional care literature. Although they share some similarities with those undergoing different health transitions, their unique needs and the specific characteristics of ED care require a novel approach. The model that emerged in this study provides direction for understanding the complex and interrelated aspects of their transitional care needs.
Authors: Christopher R Carpenter; Don Melady; Craig Krausz; Jason Wagner; Brian Froelke; Jennifer Cordia; Derrick Lowery; Brent E Ruoff; Laurie E Byrne; Douglas K Miller; Lawrence Lewis Journal: Mo Med Date: 2017 Nov-Dec
Authors: Cameron J Gettel; Jason R Falvey; Angela Gifford; Ly Hoang; Leslie A Christensen; Ula Hwang; Manish N Shah Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 7.802
Authors: Ivy Benjenk; Eva H DuGoff; Gwen C Jacobsohn; Nia Cayenne; Courtney M C Jones; Thomas V Caprio; Jeremy T Cushman; Rebecca K Green; Amy J H Kind; Michael Lohmeier; Ranran Mi; Manish N Shah Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2020-09-07 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Gwen C Jacobsohn; Courtney M C Jones; Rebecca K Green; Amy L Cochran; Thomas V Caprio; Jeremy T Cushman; Amy J H Kind; Michael Lohmeier; Ranran Mi; Manish N Shah Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 3.451