Literature DB >> 24682163

Wound complications associated with bone morphogenetic protein-2 in orthopaedic trauma surgery.

Daniel S Chan1, Joshua Garland, Anthony Infante, Roy W Sanders, H Claude Sagi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document the incidence of postoperative wound complications associated with the use of rhBMP-2 in a large series of patients for both acute traumatic and reconstructive extremity cases.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart and radiographic review.
SETTING: Level I trauma center.
METHODS: A retrospective chart and x-ray review was performed on cases between 2002 and 2009, in which rhBMP-2 (Infuse) was used in acute trauma or posttraumatic reconstruction. The following data points were collected: age, surgical site, purpose (acute vs. reconstructive), associated wound factors (open fractures, soft tissue injury requiring coverage, or history of infection), signs of infection (seroma, erythema, prolonged drainage, abscess), reoperation rate secondary to wound complication, culture results, and union. These cases were then compared with a matched cohort without the use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (matched for age, type of case, anatomic site, and open injury) for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Group 1 was comprised a total of 193 patients whose treatment included rhBMP-2 (155 reconstructive and 38 acute open fractures). Group 2 was comprised 181 patients treated without the use of rhBMP-2 (145 reconstructive and 36 acute open fractures). The incidences of documented wound complications were 31% (60/193) in group 1 and 18% (33/181) in group 2 (P = 0.004). Reoperation rates for wound complications were in 3.1% of group 1 and 8.3% of group 2 (P = 0.04). Age, sex, anatomic site, acute trauma, open fracture, and the need for soft tissue reconstruction did not correlate with the need to return to the operating room for presumed or actual wound infection. The rates of union between rhBMP-2 and control groups were 90% versus 74% (P < 0.001); for acute trauma cases, 94% versus 79% (P = 0.220); and for reconstructive cases, 89% versus 73% (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of rhBMP-2 in both acute traumatic and posttraumatic reconstructive extremity surgery may increase the incidence of prolonged postoperative serous wound drainage. However, this does not seem to correlate with an increased incidence of postoperative wound infection or the need for reoperation. The use of rhBMP-2 seems to have a beneficial effect in improving union rates for both acute trauma and posttraumatic reconstruction of the extremities (P = 0.002); however, this and the mechanism for prolonged serous drainage require further study before definitive recommendations can be made. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24682163     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  11 in total

1.  Combination therapy with BMP-2 and a systemic RANKL inhibitor enhances bone healing in a mouse critical-sized femoral defect.

Authors:  Sofia Bougioukli; Ashish Jain; Osamu Sugiyama; Brian A Tinsley; Amy H Tang; Matthew H Tan; Douglas J Adams; Paul J Kostenuik; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Ex vivo regional gene therapy with human adipose-derived stem cells for bone repair.

Authors:  Venus Vakhshori; Sofia Bougioukli; Osamu Sugiyama; Hyunwoo P Kang; Amy H Tang; Sang-Hyun Park; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  A Review of the Clinical Side Effects of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2.

Authors:  Aaron W James; Gregory LaChaud; Jia Shen; Greg Asatrian; Vi Nguyen; Xinli Zhang; Kang Ting; Chia Soo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Evaluation of complications associated with off-label use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in pediatric orthopaedics.

Authors:  Norbert Stiel; Tim N Hissnauer; Martin Rupprecht; Kornelia Babin; Carsten W Schlickewei; Johannes M Rueger; Ralf Stuecker; Alexander S Spiro
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  A Pre-clinical Standard Operating Procedure for Evaluating Orthobiologics in an In Vivo Rat Spinal Fusion Model.

Authors:  Andrew L Alejo; Scott McDermott; Yusuf Khalil; Hope C Ball; Gabrielle T Robinson; Ernesto Solorzano; Amanda M Alejo; Jacob Douglas; Trinity K Samson; Jesse W Young; Fayez F Safadi
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-05

6.  3D printed hyperelastic "bone" scaffolds and regional gene therapy: A novel approach to bone healing.

Authors:  Ram Alluri; Adam Jakus; Sofia Bougioukli; William Pannell; Osamu Sugiyama; Amy Tang; Ramille Shah; Jay R Lieberman
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.396

7.  The 'Ziran' wrap: reconstruction of critical-sized long bone defects using a fascial autograft and reamer-irrigator-aspirator autograft.

Authors:  Navid M Ziran; Wade R Smith
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-10-04

8.  Evaluating Osteogenic Potential of Ligamentum Flavum Cells Cultivated in Photoresponsive Hydrogel that Incorporates Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Chih-Wei Chiang; Wei-Chuan Chen; Hsia-Wei Liu; I-Chun Wang; Chih-Hwa Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Is NO the Answer? The Nitric Oxide Pathway Can Support Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Mediated Signaling.

Authors:  Christopher Differ; Franka Klatte-Schulz; Nicole Bormann; Susann Minkwitz; Petra Knaus; Britt Wildemann
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Three-Dimensional Changes of Maxilla after Secondary Alveolar Cleft Repair: Differences Between rhBMP-2 and Autologous Iliac Crest Bone Grafting.

Authors:  Cassio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral; Rafael Denadai; Nivaldo Alonso
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.