Literature DB >> 24682069

Effect of aleglitazar on cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the AleCardio randomized clinical trial.

A Michael Lincoff1, Jean-Claude Tardif2, Gregory G Schwartz3, Stephen J Nicholls4, Lars Rydén5, Bruce Neal6, Klas Malmberg7, Hans Wedel8, John B Buse9, Robert R Henry10, Arlette Weichert11, Ruth Cannata1, Anders Svensson11, Dietmar Volz11, Diederick E Grobbee12.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: No therapy directed against diabetes has been shown to unequivocally reduce the excess risk of cardiovascular complications. Aleglitazar is a dual agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors with insulin-sensitizing and glucose-lowering actions and favorable effects on lipid profiles.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of aleglitazar to standard medical therapy reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: AleCardio was a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 720 hospitals in 26 countries throughout North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific regions. The enrollment of 7226 patients hospitalized for ACS (myocardial infarction or unstable angina) with type 2 diabetes occurred between February 2010 and May 2012; treatment was planned to continue until patients were followed-up for at least 2.5 years and 950 primary end point events were positively adjudicated.
INTERVENTIONS: Randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive aleglitazar 150 µg or placebo daily. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary efficacy end point was time to cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Principal safety end points were hospitalization due to heart failure and changes in renal function.
RESULTS: The trial was terminated on July 2, 2013, after a median follow-up of 104 weeks, upon recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board due to futility for efficacy at an unplanned interim analysis and increased rates of safety end points. A total of 3.1% of patients were lost to follow-up and 3.2% of patients withdrew consent. The primary end point occurred in 344 patients (9.5%) in the aleglitazar group and 360 patients (10.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.83-1.11]; P = .57). Rates of serious adverse events, including heart failure (3.4% for aleglitazar vs 2.8% for placebo, P = .14), gastrointestinal hemorrhages (2.4% for aleglitazar vs 1.7% for placebo, P = .03), and renal dysfunction (7.4% for aleglitazar vs 2.7% for placebo, P < .001) were increased. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with type 2 diabetes and recent ACS, use of aleglitazar did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular outcomes. These findings do not support the use of aleglitazar in this setting with a goal of reducing cardiovascular risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01042769.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24682069     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.3321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  64 in total

Review 1.  Glucose-Lowering Therapies for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Salvatore Carbone; Dave L Dixon; Leo F Buckley; Antonio Abbate
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Exploration and Development of PPAR Modulators in Health and Disease: An Update of Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Hong Sheng Cheng; Wei Ren Tan; Zun Siong Low; Charlie Marvalim; Justin Yin Hao Lee; Nguan Soon Tan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Targeting high-density lipoproteins: increasing de novo production versus decreasing clearance.

Authors:  Arshag D Mooradian; Michael J Haas
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Predicting cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes: the heterogeneity challenges.

Authors:  M Odette Gore; Darren K McGuire; Ildiko Lingvay; Julio Rosenstock
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Triglycerides: Emerging Targets in Diabetes Care? Review of Moderate Hypertriglyceridemia in Diabetes.

Authors:  Anastasia-Stefania Alexopoulos; Ali Qamar; Kathryn Hutchins; Matthew J Crowley; Bryan C Batch; John R Guyton
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 6.  Lipid effects and cardiovascular disease risk associated with glucose-lowering medications.

Authors:  Barbara E Stähli; Catherine Gebhard; Jean-Claude Tardif
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Acute coronary syndromes: Aleglitazar trial findings reported.

Authors:  Bryony M Mearns
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  Novel therapies with precision mechanisms for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Leigh Perreault; Jay S Skyler; Julio Rosenstock
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 9.  Minireview: Challenges and opportunities in development of PPAR agonists.

Authors:  Matthew B Wright; Michele Bortolini; Moh Tadayyon; Martin Bopst
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-08-22

Review 10.  Heart Failure in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Helena C Kenny; E Dale Abel
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 17.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.