Literature DB >> 24681866

CT of preoperative and postoperative acetabular fractures revisited.

Diana N Jaskolka1, Gina A Di Primio, Adnan M Sheikh, Mark E Schweitzer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compared preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) versus radiographic imaging in the evaluation of acetabular fractures (AFs).
METHODS: Fifty-four patients who underwent imaging for AFs were retrospectively evaluated. Postoperative reduction quality was assessed on radiographs and CT scan by 2 observers. Rate of reintervention was noted. Radiation exposure from CT was calculated.
RESULTS: After reduction, 24 patients had significant findings on postoperative CT. Five patients required reintervention, all of whom had significant postoperative CT findings and complex fractures. Notably, only 1 of the 5 patients had an indication for reintervention based on radiographs alone.The average dose for preoperative/postoperative CT study was 11.5/12.3 mSv, respectively, with a cumulative average dose of 23.8 mSv.
CONCLUSIONS: Although reoperation rate is low after fixation of AFs, CT is required to identify those requiring reintervention. However, postoperative CT should be used judicially, only in patients presenting with complex acetabular fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24681866     DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182ab384a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  4 in total

1.  Part 2: outcome of acetabular fractures and associated prognostic factors-a ten-year retrospective study of one hundred and fifty six operated cases with open reduction and internal fixation.

Authors:  Mehdi Boudissa; Sébastien Ruatti; Gael Kerschbaumer; Michel Milaire; Philippe Merloz; Jérôme Tonetti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Percutaneous fixation of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Horacio Caviglia; Adrian Mejail; Maria Eulalia Landro; Nosratolah Vatani
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-21

3.  What Are the Interobserver and Intraobserver Variability of Gap and Stepoff Measurements in Acetabular Fractures?

Authors:  Anne M L Meesters; Kaj Ten Duis; Hester Banierink; Vincent M A Stirler; Philip C R Wouters; Joep Kraeima; Jean-Paul P M de Vries; Max J H Witjes; Frank F A IJpma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  The accuracy of gap and step-off measurements in acetabular fracture treatment.

Authors:  A M L Meesters; K Ten Duis; J Kraeima; H Banierink; V M A Stirler; P C R Wouters; J P P M de Vries; M J H Witjes; F F A IJpma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.