Literature DB >> 24681710

Oenological prefermentation practices strongly impact yeast population dynamics and alcoholic fermentation kinetics in Chardonnay grape must.

Warren Albertin1, Cécile Miot-Sertier2, Marina Bely3, Philippe Marullo4, Joana Coulon5, Virginie Moine5, Benoit Colonna-Ceccaldi6, Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede7.   

Abstract

Yeast species of Hanseniaspora and Candida genus are predominant during the early stages of winemaking, while species of Metschnikowia, Pichia, Zygoascus, Issatchenkia, Torulaspora and other genera are present at lower population levels. The impact of common oenological practices on yeast dynamics during the prefermentative stage and the early stage of alcoholic fermentation (AF) remains elusive. In this work, the effect of four prefermentative oenological practices (clarification degree, temperature, sulphite and starter yeast addition) on yeast dynamics was evaluated in a Chardonnay grape must. The growth curves of four genus or species, namely Saccharomyces spp., Hanseniaspora spp., Candida zemplinina and Torulaspora delbrueckii, were followed by quantitative PCR. The fermentation kinetics were also recorded, as well as the production of acetic acid. Variance analysis allowed determining the effect of each practice and their interaction factors, as well as their relative importance on yeast dynamics and fermentation kinetics. Our experimental design showed that the population dynamics of the four species were differently impacted by the oenological practices, with some species being more sensitive than others to the clarification degree (C. zemplinina), sulphite addition (Saccharomyces spp.), starter yeast inoculation (Hanseniaspora spp.) or prefermentation temperature (T. delbrueckii). Significant interaction effects between practices were revealed, highlighting the interest of experimental design allowing interaction analysis, as some factors may buffer the effect of other ones. Hanseniaspora genus showed atypical behaviour: growth dynamics showed a decrease during AF that we interpreted as early cellular lysis. In conclusion, this study provides new insights on the impact of common oenological practices on the dynamics of non-Saccharomyces yeast that will be useful for a better management of mixed fermentation between S. cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces yeasts.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Candida zemplinina; Hanseniaspora; Pre-fermentation; Torulaspora delbrueckii; Yeast dynamics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24681710     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  15 in total

1.  The impact of active dry yeasts in commercial wineries from the Denomination of Origen "Vinos de Madrid", Spain.

Authors:  M Gil-Díaz; E Valero; J M Cabellos; M García; T Arroyo
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Persistence of Two Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts (Hanseniaspora and Starmerella) in the Cellar.

Authors:  Cédric Grangeteau; Daniel Gerhards; Christian von Wallbrunn; Hervé Alexandre; Sandrine Rousseaux; Michèle Guilloux-Benatier
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Isolation and Identification of the Indigenous Yeast Population during Spontaneous Fermentation of Isabella (Vitis labrusca L.) Grape Must.

Authors:  María L Raymond Eder; Cristina Reynoso; Santiago C Lauret; Alberto L Rosa
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Yeast Monitoring of Wine Mixed or Sequential Fermentations Made by Native Strains from D.O. "Vinos de Madrid" Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Margarita García; Braulio Esteve-Zarzoso; Julia Crespo; Juan M Cabellos; Teresa Arroyo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Wine microbiology is driven by vineyard and winery anthropogenic factors.

Authors:  Cédric Grangeteau; Chloé Roullier-Gall; Sandrine Rousseaux; Régis D Gougeon; Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin; Hervé Alexandre; Michèle Guilloux-Benatier
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 5.813

Review 6.  Past and Future of Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts: From Spoilage Microorganisms to Biotechnological Tools for Improving Wine Aroma Complexity.

Authors:  Beatriz Padilla; José V Gil; Paloma Manzanares
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 7.  The Genetics of Non-conventional Wine Yeasts: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede; Marina Bely; Philippe Marullo; Warren Albertin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Hanseniaspora uvarum from Winemaking Environments Show Spatial and Temporal Genetic Clustering.

Authors:  Warren Albertin; Mathabatha E Setati; Cécile Miot-Sertier; Talitha T Mostert; Benoit Colonna-Ceccaldi; Joana Coulon; Patrick Girard; Virginie Moine; Myriam Pillet; Franck Salin; Marina Bely; Benoit Divol; Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Sequential Inoculation of Native Non-Saccharomyces and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains for Wine Making.

Authors:  Beatriz Padilla; Laura Zulian; Àngela Ferreres; Rosa Pastor; Braulio Esteve-Zarzoso; Gemma Beltran; Albert Mas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Ecological interactions are a primary driver of population dynamics in wine yeast microbiota during fermentation.

Authors:  Bahareh Bagheri; Florian Franz Bauer; Gianluigi Cardinali; Mathabatha Evodia Setati
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.