BACKGROUND: The most important reason for childhood cancer treatment failure in low-income countries is treatment abandonment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore reasons for childhood cancer treatment abandonment and assess the clinical condition of these children. DESIGN: This was a descriptive study using semistructured questionnaires. Home visits were conducted to interview families of childhood cancer patients, diagnosed between January 2007 and January 2009, who had abandoned treatment at the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH). RESULTS: Between January 2007 and January 2009, 222 children were newly diagnosed with a malignancy at MTRH. Treatment outcome was documented in 180 patients. Of these 180 patients, 98 (54%) children abandoned treatment. From December 2011 until August 2012, 53 (54%) of the 98 families were contacted. Due to lack of contact information, 45 families were untraceable. From 53 contacted families, 46 (87%) families agreed to be interviewed. Reasons for abandonment were reported by 26 families, and they were diverse. Most common reasons were financial difficulties (46%), inadequate access to health insurance (27%) and transportation difficulties (23%). Most patients (72%) abandoned treatment after the first 3 months had been completed. Of the 46 children who abandoned treatment, 9 (20%) were still alive: 6 (67%) of these children looked healthy and 3 (33%) ill. The remaining 37 (80%) children had passed away. CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of childhood cancer treatment abandonment requires improved access to health insurance, financial or transportation support, proper parental education, psychosocial guidance and ameliorated communication skills of healthcare providers.
BACKGROUND: The most important reason for childhood cancer treatment failure in low-income countries is treatment abandonment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore reasons for childhood cancer treatment abandonment and assess the clinical condition of these children. DESIGN: This was a descriptive study using semistructured questionnaires. Home visits were conducted to interview families of childhood cancerpatients, diagnosed between January 2007 and January 2009, who had abandoned treatment at the Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (MTRH). RESULTS: Between January 2007 and January 2009, 222 children were newly diagnosed with a malignancy at MTRH. Treatment outcome was documented in 180 patients. Of these 180 patients, 98 (54%) children abandoned treatment. From December 2011 until August 2012, 53 (54%) of the 98 families were contacted. Due to lack of contact information, 45 families were untraceable. From 53 contacted families, 46 (87%) families agreed to be interviewed. Reasons for abandonment were reported by 26 families, and they were diverse. Most common reasons were financial difficulties (46%), inadequate access to health insurance (27%) and transportation difficulties (23%). Most patients (72%) abandoned treatment after the first 3 months had been completed. Of the 46 children who abandoned treatment, 9 (20%) were still alive: 6 (67%) of these children looked healthy and 3 (33%) ill. The remaining 37 (80%) children had passed away. CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of childhood cancer treatment abandonment requires improved access to health insurance, financial or transportation support, proper parental education, psychosocial guidance and ameliorated communication skills of healthcare providers.
Authors: Gilbert Olbara; H A Martijn; F Njuguna; S Langat; S Martin; J Skiles; T Vik; G J L Kaspers; S Mostert Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Wilfred Ngwa; Beatrice W Addai; Isaac Adewole; Victoria Ainsworth; James Alaro; Olusegun I Alatise; Zipporah Ali; Benjamin O Anderson; Rose Anorlu; Stephen Avery; Prebo Barango; Noella Bih; Christopher M Booth; Otis W Brawley; Jean-Marie Dangou; Lynette Denny; Jennifer Dent; Shekinah N C Elmore; Ahmed Elzawawy; Diane Gashumba; Jennifer Geel; Katy Graef; Sumit Gupta; Serigne-Magueye Gueye; Nazik Hammad; Laila Hessissen; Andre M Ilbawi; Joyce Kambugu; Zisis Kozlakidis; Simon Manga; Lize Maree; Sulma I Mohammed; Susan Msadabwe; Miriam Mutebi; Annet Nakaganda; Ntokozo Ndlovu; Kingsley Ndoh; Jerry Ndumbalo; Mamsau Ngoma; Twalib Ngoma; Christian Ntizimira; Timothy R Rebbeck; Lorna Renner; Anya Romanoff; Fidel Rubagumya; Shahin Sayed; Shivani Sud; Hannah Simonds; Richard Sullivan; William Swanson; Verna Vanderpuye; Boateng Wiafe; David Kerr Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 54.433
Authors: Geoffrey Buckle; Louise Maranda; Jodi Skiles; John Michael Ong'echa; Joslyn Foley; Mara Epstein; Terry A Vik; Andrew Schroeder; Jennifer Lemberger; Alan Rosmarin; Scot C Remick; Jeffrey A Bailey; John Vulule; Juliana A Otieno; Ann M Moormann Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Christopher C Stanley; Toon van der Gronde; Kate D Westmoreland; Ande Salima; Amy Amuquandoh; Salama Itimu; Agness Manda; Idah Mtete; Mercy Butia; Atupele Mpasa; Stella Wachepa; Paula Fox; Peter Wasswa; Peter Kazembe; Nader K El-Mallawany; Satish Gopal Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-10-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Grace K Ellis; Agness Manda; Hillary Topazian; Christopher C Stanley; Ryan Seguin; Caroline E Minnick; Blessings Tewete; Asekanadziwa Mtangwanika; Mena Chawinga; Sara Chiyoyola; Maria Chikasema; Ande Salima; Stephen Kimani; Edwards Kasonkanji; Victor Mithi; Bongani Kaimila; Matthew S Painschab; Satish Gopal; Katherine D Westmoreland Journal: Int Health Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 2.473