Catriona R Mayland1, Carolyn Lees2, Alison Germain1, Barbara A Jack3, Trevor F Cox4, Stephen R Mason1, Angela West5, John E Ellershaw1. 1. Marie Curie Palliative Care Institute Liverpool (MCPCIL), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 2. Liverpool Community Health NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK. 3. Evidence-Based Practice Research Centre, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK. 4. Cancer Research UK Liverpool Cancer Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 5. Liverpool John Moore's University, Liverpool, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As well as facilitating patients' wish to die at home, evaluating quality of care in this setting is essential. Postbereavement surveys with family members represent one assessment method. 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODE) is a 40-item self-completion postbereavement questionnaire, based on the key components of best practice for care of the dying. AIM: To assess the validity and reliability of CODE by conducting: cognitive 'think aloud' interviews; test-retest analysis; and assessing internal consistency and construct validity of three key composite scales. DESIGN: Postbereavement survey to next-of-kin (NOK). SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: 291 NOK to patients who died at home in Northwest England from an advanced incurable illness were invited to complete the CODE questionnaire. Additionally, potential participants were asked to undertake a cognitive interview and/or complete CODE for a second time a month later. RESULTS: 72 bereaved relatives (24.7% response rate) returned the completed CODE questionnaire, and 25 completed CODE for a second time. 15 cognitive interviews were undertaken. All interviewees found CODE sensitively worded and easy to understand. Minor revisions were suggested to provide additional clarity. Test-retest analysis showed all except one question had moderate or good stability. Although the ENVIRONMENT scale was not as relevant within the home setting, all three key composite scales showed good internal consistency and construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: 'CODE' represents a user-friendly, comprehensive outcome measure for care of the dying and has been found to be valid and reliable. CODE could potentially be used to benchmark individual organisations and identify areas for improvement. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: As well as facilitating patients' wish to die at home, evaluating quality of care in this setting is essential. Postbereavement surveys with family members represent one assessment method. 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODE) is a 40-item self-completion postbereavement questionnaire, based on the key components of best practice for care of the dying. AIM: To assess the validity and reliability of CODE by conducting: cognitive 'think aloud' interviews; test-retest analysis; and assessing internal consistency and construct validity of three key composite scales. DESIGN: Postbereavement survey to next-of-kin (NOK). SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: 291 NOK to patients who died at home in Northwest England from an advanced incurable illness were invited to complete the CODE questionnaire. Additionally, potential participants were asked to undertake a cognitive interview and/or complete CODE for a second time a month later. RESULTS: 72 bereaved relatives (24.7% response rate) returned the completed CODE questionnaire, and 25 completed CODE for a second time. 15 cognitive interviews were undertaken. All interviewees found CODE sensitively worded and easy to understand. Minor revisions were suggested to provide additional clarity. Test-retest analysis showed all except one question had moderate or good stability. Although the ENVIRONMENT scale was not as relevant within the home setting, all three key composite scales showed good internal consistency and construct validity. CONCLUSIONS: 'CODE' represents a user-friendly, comprehensive outcome measure for care of the dying and has been found to be valid and reliable. CODE could potentially be used to benchmark individual organisations and identify areas for improvement. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bereavement; Quality of life; Terminal care
Authors: Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; H Roeline W Pasman; Ida J Korfage; Erica Witkamp; Masha Zee; Liza Gg van Lent; Anne Goossensen; Agnes van der Heide Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Catriona Rachel Mayland; Helen Mulholland; Maureen Gambles; John Ellershaw; Kevin Stewart Journal: BMJ Support Palliat Care Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: Maria Heckel; Annika R Vogt; Stephanie Stiel; Johannes Radon; Sandra Kurkowski; Swantje Goebel; Christoph Ostgathe; Martin Weber Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-05-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Catriona Rachel Mayland; Christina Gerlach; Katrin Sigurdardottir; Marit Irene Tuen Hansen; Wojciech Leppert; Andrzej Stachowiak; Maria Krajewska; Eduardo Garcia-Yanneo; Vilma Adriana Tripodoro; Gabriel Goldraij; Martin Weber; Lair Zambon; Juliana Nalin Passarini; Ivete Bredda Saad; John Ellershaw; Dagny Faksvåg Haugen Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2019-01-10 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Dagny Faksvåg Haugen; Karl Ove Hufthammer; Christina Gerlach; Katrin Sigurdardottir; Marit Irene Tuen Hansen; Grace Ting; Vilma Adriana Tripodoro; Gabriel Goldraij; Eduardo Garcia Yanneo; Wojciech Leppert; Katarzyna Wolszczak; Lair Zambon; Juliana Nalin Passarini; Ivete Alonso Bredda Saad; Martin Weber; John Ellershaw; Catriona Rachel Mayland Journal: Oncologist Date: 2021-06-17