Literature DB >> 24681524

The distribution and extent of reflux and obstruction in patients with active venous ulceration.

Aditi M Kanth1, Sami U Khan2, Antonis Gasparis2, Nicos Labropoulos2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to precisely define the underlying pathophysiology in patients with active venous ulcers.
METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted from 1991 to 2013 to select papers reporting the anatomic and physiologic etiology of ulceration in CEAP Class 6 patients. Studies which did not decipher between active and healed ulcers, did not use clear definitions, or did not give detailed accounts on the distribution/extent of venous pathology were excluded. Using the PRISMA guidelines, 12 studies were selected for further analysis.
RESULTS: Primary insufficiency was reportedly the most common etiology of ulcers. Reflux most frequently occurred in the superficial system, either isolated or in conjunction with perforating and/or deep systems. Combined superficial and deep disease was observed in a median of 11.6% of limbs (range of 0-48%). Triple system disease was seen in a median of 31.6% of limbs (range of 22-52%). Isolated deep reflux was infrequently reported (2.1-28.4% of limbs). Previous deep venous thrombosis, reported in a median of 33% of patients, is likely underreported as it may resolve without detectable damage.
CONCLUSION: There is a lack of data in the literature regarding the etiology of chronic active venous ulcers. Insufficiency of the superficial venous system from the micro- to the macro-vasculature has been frequently implicated in the development of venous ulceration. A prospective randomized controlled study is required for more conclusive results.
© The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Venous ulceration; venous obstruction; venous reflux

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24681524     DOI: 10.1177/0268355514530277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phlebology        ISSN: 0268-3555            Impact factor:   1.740


  5 in total

1.  Do All Abdominal Neuroendocrine Tumors Require Extended Postoperative VTE Prophylaxis? A NSQIP Analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas J Skertich; Justin Gerard; Jennifer Poirier; Martin Hertl; Sam G Pappas; Erik Schadde; Xavier M Keutgen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Effect of concomitant deep venous reflux on truncal endovenous ablation outcomes in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Craig S Brown; Nicholas H Osborne; Gloria Y Kim; Danielle C Sutzko; Thomas W Wakefield; Andrea T Obi; Peter K Henke
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord       Date:  2020-06-24

3.  Thromboembolic Disease after Cervical Spine Surgery: A Review of 5,405 Surgical Procedures and Matched Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Arjun S Sebastian; Bradford L Currier; Michelle J Clarke; Dirk Larson; Paul M Huddleston; Ahmad Nassr
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-11-26

4.  Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism following Thoracolumbar Surgery: Analysis of 43,777 Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2005 to 2012.

Authors:  Arjun S Sebastian; Bradford L Currier; Sanjeev Kakar; Emily C Nguyen; Amy E Wagie; Elizabeth S Habermann; Ahmad Nassr
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2016-02-17

5.  Venous ulcerations occur more frequently in women on the left lower leg. Can pelvic congestion syndrome be an often undetected cause?

Authors:  Jan-Malte Placke; Finja Jockenhöfer; Sven Benson; Joachim Dissemond
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.