Literature DB >> 24680133

Measurement and simulation of Joule heating during treatment of B-16 melanoma tumors in mice with nanosecond pulsed electric fields.

Uwe Pliquett1, Richard Nuccitelli2.   

Abstract

Experimental evidence shows that nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEF) trigger apoptosis in skin tumors. We have postulated that the energy delivered by nsPEF is insufficient to impart significant heating to the treated tissue. Here we use both direct measurements and theoretical modeling of the Joule heating in order to validate this assumption. For the temperature measurement, thermo-sensitive liquid crystals (TLC) were used to determine the surface temperature while a micro-thermocouple (made from 30 μm wires) was used for measuring the temperature inside the tissue. The calculation of the temperature distribution used an asymptotic approach with the repeated calculation of the electric field, Joule heating and heat transfer, and the subsequent readjustment of the electrical tissue conductivity. This yields a temperature distribution both in space and time. It can be shown that for the measured increase in temperature an unexpectedly high electrical conductivity of the tissue would be required, which was indeed found by using voltage and current monitoring during the experiment. Using impedance measurements within t(after)=50 μs after the pulse revealed a fast decline of the high conductivity state when the electric field ceases. The experimentally measured high conductance of a skin fold (mouse) between plate electrodes was about 5 times higher than those of the maximally expected conductance due to fully electroporated membrane structures (G(max)/G(electroporated))≈5. Fully electroporated membrane structure assumes that 100% of the membranes are conductive which is estimated from an impedance measurement at 10 MHz where membranes are capacitively shorted. Since the temperature rise in B-16 mouse melanoma tumors due to equally spaced (Δt=2 s) 300 ns-pulses with E=40 kV/cm usually does not exceed ΔΤ=3 K at all parts of the skin fold between the electrodes, a hyperthermic effect on the tissue can be excluded.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B-16 tumor; Electroporation; Joule heating; Temperature imaging; nsPEF

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24680133     DOI: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry        ISSN: 1567-5394            Impact factor:   5.373


  13 in total

Review 1.  Immune response triggered by the ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma with nanosecond pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Jianpeng Liu; Xinhua Chen; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Surgical Ablation of Cardiac Tissue with Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields in Swine.

Authors:  Frency Varghese; Jonathan M Philpott; Johanna U Neuber; Barbara Hargrave; Christian W Zemlin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.495

3.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in human osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Xudong Miao; Shengyong Yin; Zhou Shao; Yi Zhang; Xinhua Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Nano-pulse stimulation (NPS) ablate tumors and inhibit lung metastasis on both canine spontaneous osteosarcoma and murine transplanted hepatocellular carcinoma with high metastatic potential.

Authors:  Xinhua Chen; Yiling Chen; Jianwen Jiang; Liming Wu; Shengyong Yin; Xudong Miao; Robert J Swanson; Shusen Zheng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-04

5.  Multi-parametric study of temperature and thermal damage of tumor exposed to high-frequency nanosecond-pulsed electric fields based on finite element simulation.

Authors:  Yan Mi; Shaoqin Rui; Chengxiang Li; Chenguo Yao; Jin Xu; Changhao Bian; Xuefeng Tang
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Experimental Nanopulse Ablation of Multiple Membrane Parasite on Ex Vivo Hydatid Cyst.

Authors:  Xinhua Chen; Ruiqing Zhang; Hao Wen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Activation of Anti-tumor Immune Response by Ablation of HCC with Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field.

Authors:  Xiaobo Xu; Yiling Chen; Ruiqing Zhang; Xudong Miao; Xinhua Chen
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2017-10-27

8.  Multi-Omics Analysis Reveals Disturbance of Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Field in the Serum Metabolic Spectrum and Gut Microbiota.

Authors:  Yeping Dong; Jiahua Lu; Ting Wang; Zhiliang Huang; Xinhua Chen; Zhigang Ren; Liangjie Hong; Haiyu Wang; Dezhi Yang; Haiyang Xie; Wu Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Multiphoton imaging reveals that nanosecond pulsed electric fields collapse tumor and normal vascular perfusion in human glioblastoma xenografts.

Authors:  Sylvia M Bardet; Lynn Carr; Malak Soueid; Delia Arnaud-Cormos; Philippe Leveque; Rodney P O'Connor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Nanopulse Stimulation (NPS) Induces Tumor Ablation and Immunity in Orthotopic 4T1 Mouse Breast Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Stephen J Beebe; Brittany P Lassiter; Siqi Guo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.