Literature DB >> 24679592

Direction of single obstacle circumvention in middle-aged children.

Amy L Hackney1, Nicole Van Ruymbeke2, Pamela J Bryden2, Michael E Cinelli3.   

Abstract

When required to walk around a stationary object, adults use the location of the goal to set up their locomotor axis and obstacles presented along the locomotor axis will repel the individual towards the side that affords more space [1]. Research has yet to examine whether children can identify the locomotor axis and choose their paths accordingly. Therefore, the current study examined the factors that influence the direction in which children choose to deviate around a single obstacle and whether the presence or absence of a goal influences path selection and trajectory. Ten children (age: 7.1 years±0.8) walked along a 9 m path and avoided a single obstacle that was located in one of three locations (midline, 15 cm to the right or 15 cm to the left). On half the trials, an end-goal was visible from the start of the path while the other half of the trials had no visible goal. The results demonstrate that: (1) children are able to perceive and move towards more open space but are more variable when the end-goal is not visible; (2) children are capable of maintaining an elliptical-shaped protective envelope when avoiding a single obstacle regardless of whether or not the locomotor axis is established; and (3) although children are capable of choosing paths that afford the most space, the manner in which they arrive at their goal is not driven by factors similar to adults.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Human locomotion; Kinematics; Obstacle circumvention; Perception of space

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24679592     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  7 in total

1.  Strategies for obstacle avoidance during walking in the cat.

Authors:  Kevin M I Chu; Sandy H Seto; Irina N Beloozerova; Vladimir Marlinski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  An assessment of auditory-guided locomotion in an obstacle circumvention task.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Amy C Scarfe; Brian C J Moore; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Echoic Sensory Substitution Information in a Single Obstacle Circumvention Task.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Amy C Scarfe; Brian C J Moore; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Blindness enhances auditory obstacle circumvention: Assessing echolocation, sensory substitution, and visual-based navigation.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Amy C Scarfe; Brian C J Moore; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mind the Gap: Gap Affordance Judgments of Children, Teens, and Adults in an Immersive Virtual Environment.

Authors:  Sarah H Creem-Regehr; Devin M Gill; Grant D Pointon; Bobby Bodenheimer; Jeanine K Stefanucci
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2019-10-15

6.  Partial visual loss disrupts the relationship between judged room size and sound source distance.

Authors:  Andrew J Kolarik; Brian C J Moore; Silvia Cirstea; Rajiv Raman; Sarika Gopalakrishnan; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The relationship between foot arch measurements and walking parameters in children.

Authors:  Simone V Gill; Sara Keimig; Damian Kelty-Stephen; Ya-Ching Hung; Jeremy M DeSilva
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 2.125

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.