Literature DB >> 24679584

Single-phase and two-phase anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable waste: comparison of start-up, reactor stability and process performance.

Rangaraj Ganesh1, Michel Torrijos2, Philippe Sousbie1, Aurelien Lugardon3, Jean Philippe Steyer1, Jean Philippe Delgenes1.   

Abstract

Single-phase and two-phase digestion of fruit and vegetable waste were studied to compare reactor start-up, reactor stability and performance (methane yield, volatile solids reduction and energy yield). The single-phase reactor (SPR) was a conventional reactor operated at a low loading rate (maximum of 3.5 kgVS/m3 d), while the two-phase system consisted of an acidification reactor (TPAR) and a methanogenic reactor (TPMR). The TPAR was inoculated with methanogenic sludge similar to the SPR, but was operated with step-wise increase in the loading rate and with total recirculation of reactor solids to convert it into acidification sludge. Before each feeding, part of the sludge from TPAR was centrifuged, the centrifuge liquid (solubilized products) was fed to the TPMR and centrifuged solids were recycled back to the reactor. Single-phase digestion produced a methane yield of 0.45 m3 CH4/kg VS fed and VS removal of 83%. The TPAR shifted to acidification mode at an OLR of 10.0 kgVS/m3 d and then achieved stable performance at 7.0 kgVS/m3 d and pH 5.5-6.2, with very high substrate solubilization rate and a methane yield of 0.30 m3 CH4/kg COD fed. The two-phase process was capable of high VS reduction, but material and energy balance showed that the single-phase process was superior in terms of volumetric methane production and energy yield by 33%. The lower energy yield of the two-phase system was due to the loss of energy during hydrolysis in the TPAR and the deficit in methane production in the TPMR attributed to COD loss due to biomass synthesis and adsorption of hard COD onto the flocs. These results including the complicated operational procedure of the two-phase process and the economic factors suggested that the single-phase process could be the preferred system for FVW.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energy yield; Fruit and vegetable waste; Process stability; Single-phase process; Solids recirculation; Two-phase process

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24679584     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  2 in total

1.  Assessment of the start-up process of anaerobic digestion utilizing swine manure: 13C fractionation of biogas and microbial dynamics.

Authors:  Zuopeng Lv; Jiazhuo Liang; Xin Chen; Zhongbing Chen; Jihong Jiang; Gary J Loake
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  A fast linear predictive adaptive model of packed bed coupled with UASB reactor treating onion waste to produce biofuel.

Authors:  Harvey Milquez-Sanabria; Luis Blanco-Cocom; Liliana Alzate-Gaviria
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 5.328

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.